Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX580
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b3f2/9b3f2d6a50d2689c7f63c3c89a882f0e770aa80f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX580 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 167g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FX550
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX580 Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FX580, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and FX580 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and FX580 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-M1 II was revealed 7 years later than the FX580 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX580 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-M1 II matches up against the FX580 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX580 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Panasonic FX580 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic FX580
E-M1 II | FX580 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 94 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX580 over the Olympus E-M1 II
FX580 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FX580
E-M1 II | FX580 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX580 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II provides exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX580 has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic FX580 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the FX580.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffe33/ffe337b3e54e76898f63497c93b1d2d3133bea46" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX580 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX580 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and FX580 is 68 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67a8/b67a8d7cba6d9b67c745b1b475e9539fd10b9540" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX580 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX580 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX580 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reading specs. The photograph below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and FX580.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will deliver more detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/788ce/788ce92472da60659de01556217cdae4b46005d3" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX580 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX580 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX580 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1def7/1def7ae71ce89a348d14051af04fab6130aa315d" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX580 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX580 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic FX580 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX550 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2009-01-27 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 2 | 1 |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $499 |