Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF8
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27fce/27fced1b30df29f9c1d9c26f1646ff64695d521a" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 front"
90 Imaging
54 Features
62 Overall
57
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 266g - 107 x 65 x 33mm
- Released February 2016
- Superseded the Panasonic GF7
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF8 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic GF8, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and GF8 (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor size (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M1 II was brought out 8 months later than the GF8 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic GF8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-M1 II scores versus the GF8 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF8 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Panasonic GF8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Panasonic GF8
E-M1 II | GF8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | ![]() | February 2016 | Fresher by 8 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF8 over the Olympus E-M1 II
GF8 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1037k | Crisper screen (+3k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic GF8
E-M1 II | GF8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF8 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II has exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Panasonic GF8 has dimensions of 107mm x 65mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 266 grams (0.59 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II and Panasonic GF8 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 II against the GF8.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02b13/02b13d4fec4c80d1dcdbe7d179f1ba92f18dd264" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF8 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF8 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and GF8 is 68 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdd5e/cdd5ec8dcf25ece200ba303cb7447132d961d7fa" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF8 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF8 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF8 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing merely by going over specs. The visual underneath may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and GF8.
All in all, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Olympus E-M1 II to offer extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b90e2/b90e21ff6be75190e54f6303c1bca296df1fdc19" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF8 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF8 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF8 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37d1e/37d1e3921fe370c318956b47551d4d0bfc89cfe7" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF8 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Panasonic GF8 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2016-02-15 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4592 x 3448 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 107 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/500 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames/s | 5.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 5.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, flash off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 50p, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lbs) | 266g (0.59 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 107 x 65 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 230 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3-shot/10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $549 |