Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-5
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36c34/36c348531fded57bb8232a7d8dbfc92d463e3677" alt="Pentax K-5 front Pentax K-5 front"
60 Imaging
56 Features
82 Overall
66
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 740g - 131 x 97 x 73mm
- Introduced December 2010
- Replaced the Pentax K-7
- New Model is Pentax K-5 IIs
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-5 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Olympus E-M1 II versus Pentax K-5, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and K-5 (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and K-5 (APS-C) possess different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M1 II was brought out 5 years later than the K-5 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-5 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-M1 II grades against the K-5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-5 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Pentax K-5. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Pentax K-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Pentax K-5
E-M1 II | K-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | ![]() | December 2010 | Fresher by 71 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 921k | Sharper display (+116k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-5 over the Olympus E-M1 II
K-5 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Pentax K-5
E-M1 II | K-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera often, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II features outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Pentax K-5 has measurements of 131mm x 97mm x 73mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 740 grams (1.63 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 II versus Pentax K-5 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 II vs the K-5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ce9c/8ce9ca6e461efdcdc0eec2ae513efeb54fc305b5" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-5 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-5 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and K-5 is 68 and 60 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a05bf/a05bfc52cc303ffc5c2035d19a86a23b0019909a" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-5 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-5 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing merely by checking a spec sheet. The visual underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and K-5.
Clearly, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Olympus E-M1 II will resolve more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e0c4/0e0c4791888b437e98c494d34a4be94c4da1c673" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-5 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3fefb/3fefb8bfd7ffcf40db97cabb4ce87cf3f61a041b" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Pentax K-5 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Pentax K-5 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2010-12-18 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | Prime II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Number of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/8000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync, High speed, Rear curtain and Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (25 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 30 fps), 640 x 424 (25, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lbs) | 740g (1.63 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 131 x 97 x 73mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 80 | 82 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 14.1 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 1162 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 980 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Two | 1 |
Launch pricing | $1,700 | $800 |