Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G

Portability
68
Imaging
58
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G front
Portability
90
Imaging
39
Features
44
Overall
41

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Launched September 2016
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 4.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-481mm (F) lens
  • 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
  • Introduced August 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 Mark II vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G: A Hands-On, In-Depth Camera Showdown

Choosing your next camera can feel like navigating a bazaar of shiny gadgets - each promising the moon yet carrying its own share of quirks and trade-offs. Today, we’re pitting two very differently designed cameras against one another: the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II, a professional-grade Micro Four Thirds mirrorless marvel, versus the Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G, a quirky compact superzoom camera with integrated mobile connectivity. If you’re scratching your head wondering how these two stack up in the real world, you’re in the right place.

Having tested thousands of cameras over 15 years, including extensive fieldwork across disciplines from landscapes to wildlife, I’ll draw upon that know-how to give you a no-nonsense, experience-driven breakdown. Whether you want serious image quality, portability, or connectivity for casual shoots, let’s dive deep into these cameras’ specs and real-world performance.

Physical Feel & Handling: Size Really Matters (But How Much?)

Right out of the gate, the Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G cater to very different hands - and ambitions. The Olympus is a larger, chunkier camera built for serious shooting with a solid grip and a weight that reassures you it means business. By contrast, the Galaxy Camera 4G is slim, pocketable, and feels more like a snuggly tech toy than a professional tool.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II measures roughly 134x91x67 mm and weighs 574g - not exactly pocket friendly, but it strikes an excellent balance between durability and ergonomics. Its SLR-style body design fits well in the hand, especially important during extended sessions. The rugged build with weather sealing lets you confidently brave some light rain or dusty trails without panic.

Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G comes in at a slim 129x71x19 mm and just 305g. It’s designed for grab-and-go convenience. Imagine carrying it in a jacket pocket or small bag - perfect for spontaneous street photography or travel. However, the trade-off is (unsurprisingly) a lightweight plastic build with no weather sealing - it’s a camera care must.

Ergonomics and tactile feedback: The E-M1 II rocks physical dials, customizable buttons, and a deep grip that even my spider-like hands (large, nimble, and occasionally clumsy) appreciated. The Galaxy Camera is a basic slab with no dedicated exposure controls - everything is menu-driven on its touchscreen. This means slower manual control and less instant tactile feedback.

In sum: If you want a camera you'll carry when you’re serious about shooting (anywhere from wildlife to professional work), the Olympus E-M1 II’s heft and robust design feel reassuring. The Galaxy Camera 4G is more of a casual snap-and-share device, ideal for social media-savvy travelers or those without the urge to fuss over controls.

A Puffy View: Top Controls & Interface

Nothing affects your shooting flow quite like how well a camera’s controls fit your style.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G top view buttons comparison

The Olympus impresses with dedicated dials for shutter speed, aperture, ISO, and exposure compensation - things professionals and enthusiasts absolutely demand. These controls are spaced intuitively, and most buttons are backlit (though not illuminated) and textured for quick feel. The mode dial clicks decisively without fuss. The second card slot sits within easy reach for backup or overflow - a boon for shoots needing reliability.

Samsung’s Galaxy Camera 4G bears a completely different personality: it has no physical dials or even shutter speed / aperture priority modes. Instead, it leans heavily on touchscreen menus controlled by swipes and taps. While the Android-based interface is intuitive for mobile users, it hinders rapid adjustments, especially in changing light or action scenes.

Verdict: Olympus wins hands down in control and configurability, reflecting its pro mirrorless ethos. The Galaxy Camera 4G is more beginner-friendly, aiming at users who want quick auto modes over granular manual tweaks.

Sensor Size & Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

This is the elephant in the room - and the one most of us obsess over. Sensor technology shapes everything from dynamic range and low-light prowess to color depth and the coveted “look” of your photos.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II features a 20-megapixel Four Thirds (17.4 x 13 mm) CMOS sensor sans anti-aliasing filter. This absence sharpens image detail at the cost of minor moiré risk. The TruePic VIII processor effectively extracts detail, handles noise, and supports a maximum native ISO of 25,600. DxOMark scores are respectable: 80 overall, with a similar competitive dynamic range (12.8 EV) and color depth (23.7 bits).

Why does this matter? It means your Olympus images will have pleasing tonal gradation, solid low-light usability (ISO 1600-3200 still very usable with noise well controlled), and superb sharpness when paired with the right glass - especially beneficial for landscape and portrait work where subtle details count.

Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G is built around a smaller 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS sensor (6.17 x 4.55 mm) at 16 megapixels, equipped with an optical anti-aliasing filter. Despite the BSI architecture designed to optimize light-gathering, the tiny sensor area limits dynamic range, color fidelity, and noise handling. Maximum ISO tops out at 3200, with practical use often capped much lower.

In low light or high contrast, expect flatter images with less latitude for post-processing. The sensor is optimized for convenience and zoom range rather than standout image quality.

Bottom line: The Olympus sensor delivers far superior image quality - richer color depth, higher dynamic range, and better noise control. The Galaxy is more of a point-and-shoot compact sensor optimized for versatility over image excellence.

Reflections on the Backscreen & Viewfinder Experience

The way you review, compose, and interact with your image can change your entire experience, from in-the-moment shooting to post-capture critique.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The Olympus E-M1 II offers a 3-inch fully articulated touchscreen LCD with 1,037k-dot resolution, making it crisp and color-accurate. This flexibility allows shooting from awkward angles, including waist-level or over-the-head captures - a boon for macro and street shooters alike. Beyond the LCD, an electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 2,360k-dot resolution delivers a bright, lag-free view with 100% coverage and 0.74x magnification - one of the better EVFs out there. This makes it comfortable to track fast action or compose steady landscapes even in bright sun.

Samsung’s Galaxy Camera 4G struggles by comparison: it has a 4.8-inch fixed LCD touchscreen with an HD Super Clear display (308 ppi), noticeably bigger but less crisp in daylight due to its glossy finish and glass covering. There’s no viewfinder at all; composing must be done on the screen - a deal breaker for some daylight outdoor users or rapid sequence shooters. The lack of tilting or articulation also limits flexibility for creative framing.

In practice: I found the Olympus LCD and EVF to be game-changers for professional and enthusiast use, enriching composition and focusing precision. The Galaxy’s large touchscreen made casual framing easy but suffered usability issues in bright sun or fast action needing eye-level precision.

Shooting Scenarios Across Genres: Which Camera Plays Where?

Let’s cut to the chase: how do these two differ when tossed into the wild, sports fields, or a cozy portrait session?

Portrait Photography

Portraits demand beautiful skin tones, precise eye detection autofocus, and attractive background separation with bokeh.

Olympus E-M1 II excels here. The 20MP sensor rendition, combined with excellent Micro Four Thirds lenses offering wide apertures and smooth bokeh, yields pleasing portraits with subtle color gradation and sharp focus on the eyes. Olympus’s 121-point AF system includes contrast and phase detection, along with eye-detection AF (though animal eye detection is absent), making it easy to nail focus on human eyes. Coupled with in-body 5-axis stabilization, you can handhold longer with less blur.

Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G offers a fixed zoom lens but lacks manual focus and eye AF capabilities. Skin tones are passable under good lighting but tend to be less nuanced. Bokeh is minimal due to the small sensor and lens design. So, portraits will look “snapshotty” - fine for casual sharing, less so for serious portraiture.

Landscape Photography

Landscape imagery often benefits from wide dynamic range, resolution, and weather sealing.

Again, Olympus shines. The more expansive dynamic range allows better recovery of shadows and highlights. The 5184x3888 max resolution is ample for large prints and cropping. Weather sealing enables shooting in inclement conditions without worry, and articulating LCD assists tricky angles.

Samsung’s tiny sensor and limited ISO flexibility hinder dynamic range and detail. Without weather resistance, shooting outdoors in less ideal conditions is riskier.

Wildlife Photography

Wildlife demands rapid AF, telephoto reach, and fast burst shooting.

Olympus has clear advantages in autofocus. Its 121 AF points with hybrid contrast and phase detection deliver snappy locking - even when subjects are erratically moving. The high burst shooting rate up to 60 fps (electronic shutter) and 15 fps mechanical shutter help capture decisive moments. Plus, the Micro Four Thirds lens ecosystem offers a wealth of supertelephoto lenses (400mm, 300mm primes) that are also relatively compact.

The Galaxy’s fixed 23-481mm (equivalent) zoom lens sounds tempting but suffers due to limited AF sophistication and lack of burst modes. It shoots relatively slowly and only relies on contrast detection AF, which can be sluggish or hunt outdoors.

Sports Photography

High-speed tracking and continuous burst capture define sports shooters’ toolkits.

Olympus again flexes its muscle with 15 fps mechanical or 60 fps electronic shutter modes. The comprehensive autofocus system tracks subjects closely, supported by face detection and AF tracking modes. Coupled with reliable weather sealing, it’s a solid choice for serious sports shooters on a budget who want mirrorless convenience.

Samsung’s camera, aimed at casual use, lacks shutter priority or manual exposure, making it unsuitable to nail sharp action shots.

Street Photography

Here, discretion, portability, and quick responsiveness prevail.

The Galaxy Camera 4G’s slim profile and lightweight design make it a natural street shooter. It’s unobtrusive, quick to power on, and great for casual social shooting - including direct upload over mobile networks. However, the lack of EVF and slower AF might slow down decisive moments.

Olympus, while larger, is still reasonably compact in the pro mirrorless class. Its silent electronic shutter and fast AF can make it effective for street, especially if you want better image quality and manual control.

Macro Photography

Macro work benefits from precision focus and stabilization.

Olympus’s in-body 5-axis stabilization gives major aid in handheld macro shooting. Plus, compatibility with various Micro Four Thirds macro lenses and focus bracketing/stacking modes boosts creative flexibility.

The Galaxy Camera lacks manual focus and advanced stabilization modes, limiting macro work to basic fixed-focus close-ups.

Night & Astrophotography

Low light performance tests a camera’s sensor, ISO noise controls, and exposure modes.

Olympus’s sensor and processor deliver cleaner images up to ISO 3200. While not full-frame level, it’s excellent for starfields and night scenes with the right lenses and exposure techniques.

The Galaxy’s small sensor compounds noise at anything above ISO 400-800, hampering serious night work.

Video Abilities: Beyond Still Frames

Both cameras offer video recording, but with very different target users.

Olympus E-M1 II shoots 4K UHD (up to 30p) and cinema 4K (24p) at respectable bitrates (about 102-237 Mbps). The 5-axis image stabilization smooths handheld video footage impressively. It has microphone and headphone ports for monitoring and external mics - meeting semi-pro videographers’ needs. Plus, manual exposure control and focus peaking assist creative video shooting.

Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G records only Full HD 1080p, lacks external mic input, and has no headphone monitoring. Video stabilization is optical but less sophisticated than Olympus’s sensor-shift IBIS. Video controls are largely automated, aiming for simple social media clips rather than polished productions.

Battery & Storage: How Long Can You Shoot?

In my experience, battery life can make or break a camera’s usability in the field.

The Olympus E-M1 II uses a BLH-1 battery capable of about 350 shots per charge, which is decent but not class-leading. Having dual UHS-II SD card slots helps for buffering and backup during rapid shooting.

The Galaxy Camera’s battery life is unspecified but generally limited by its large LCD and mobile radios. Storage is via a single microSD slot - adequate but less flexible.

Connectivity & Extras: Keeping You Connected

The Galaxy Camera 4G’s standout feature is, naturally, 4G cellular connectivity plus built-in GPS - something almost unheard of in standalone cameras. This makes it ideal for instant social sharing or geotagging without a phone.

Olympus offers Wi-Fi connectivity but no cellular radio or GPS. It supports USB 3.0 and HDMI output for faster transfers and tethered shooting workflows.

Price & Value: How Should Your Wallet Decide?

Upon release, the Olympus E-M1 II hit the shelves at $1700 USD body only - a serious investment targeting enthusiasts and pros seeking a lightweight high-performance system.

Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G launched in a more affordable $550 range - a fun gadget for snapshooters and travelers wanting mobile upload and zoom flexibility without worrying about lenses.

It’s important to position these cameras in their rightful categories - the Olympus is a pro mirrorless tool; the Samsung a niche compact superzoom.

Wrap-Up: Which Camera Wins for You?

After putting these cameras through their paces across multiple disciplines, here’s how I see them stacking up for different users:

For Enthusiasts and Professionals

The Olympus E-M1 Mark II is a no-brainer. Whether for portraits, landscapes, wildlife, sports, or video, it delivers excellent image quality, fast and reliable autofocus, professional controls, and a solid feature set - including 4K video and weather resistance. The Micro Four Thirds lens system is mature and versatile. The only caveats: somewhat limited battery life and a pricier entry point.

For Casual Photographers and Travelers

The Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G occupies a unique space. It’s a fun tool for shoot-and-share users who value a massive zoom range and built-in cellular connectivity over image quality or manual control. If you want a social-media-centric camera that’s pocketable and easy, this will hit the spot. But don’t expect professional results or rapid control access.

How They Measure Up Across Genres: A Closer Look

  • Portraits: Olympus leads with sharper skin tones, bokeh, and eye detection.
  • Landscapes: Olympus offers superior dynamic range and higher resolution.
  • Wildlife: Olympus’s autofocus speed and tele lenses win comfortably.
  • Sports: Olympus’s burst rate and tracking capabilities make it a strong choice.
  • Street: Samsung’s compact size helps candid shots; Olympus’s speed aids decisive moments.
  • Macro: Olympus’s stabilization and focus bracketing dominate.
  • Night/Astro: Olympus’s sensor sensitivity and noise control perform better.
  • Video: Olympus offers 4K, better audio input, and stabilization.
  • Travel: Samsung’s portability and mobile connectivity favor casual use; Olympus’s versatility suits serious travel photographers.
  • Professional Work: Olympus’s RAW support, durability, and workflow integration make it a standout.

Final Thoughts

The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II exemplifies the evolution of mirrorless cameras aimed at demanding photographers who expect pro-grade features in a highly portable package. It delivers on image quality, autofocus, and usability across numerous photographic disciplines.

The Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G, meanwhile, is an intriguing relic from an era exploring camera-mobile convergence. Its fixed zoom, touchscreen interface, and 4G connectivity are charming in their novelty but inevitably limited by sensor size and lack of manual controls.

If you want a tool you can rely on to craft stunning images across demanding settings and plan to grow in your photographic journey, the Olympus E-M1 II is worth every penny. If your main goal is casual, everyday shooting with the convenience of instant sharing, the Galaxy Camera 4G can still serve well - provided you temper expectations on image quality and creative control.

Sample Images: Seeing Is Believing

Before you sign off, here’s a gallery comparing sample shots from both cameras - look closely at sharpness, dynamic range, and color rendition.

In this matchup between a professional powerhouse and a novelty compact, experience matters - and hopefully, this hands-on breakdown makes your camera choice clearer and suited to your style, ambitions, and budget. Happy shooting!

Olympus E-M1 II vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISamsung Galaxy Camera 4G
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Samsung Galaxy Camera 4G
Category Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2016-09-19 2012-08-29
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII 1.4GHz Quad-Core
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 -
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW support
Lowest enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 23-481mm (20.9x)
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 4.8 inches
Display resolution 1,037 thousand dot 0 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech - 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds -
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds -
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shutter speed 60.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) none
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574g (1.27 pounds) 305g (0.67 pounds)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photographs -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) -
Time lapse feature
Storage media Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC
Storage slots Two One
Pricing at release $1,700 $550