Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A33
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72


67 Imaging
54 Features
80 Overall
64
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A33 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Launched September 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
- Revealed August 2010
- Successor is Sony A35

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A33 Overview
Here is a extensive comparison of the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A33, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and A33 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A33 (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.

The E-M1 II was released 6 years later than the A33 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A33 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-M1 II matches up against the A33 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A33 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony SLT-A33. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony A33 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A33
E-M1 II | A33 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | ![]() | August 2010 | Fresher by 74 months |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 921k | Crisper screen (+116k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A33 over the Olympus E-M1 II
A33 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A33
E-M1 II | A33 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both good for selfies |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A33 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony A33 has measurements of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A33 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the A33.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and A33 is 68 and 67 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A33 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing just by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and A33.
Clearly, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh trickier and the Olympus E-M1 II will produce greater detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The newer E-M1 II should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A33 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A33 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony SLT-A33 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony SLT-A33 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2016-09-19 | 2010-08-24 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 15 |
Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Number of lenses | 107 | 143 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 1,150k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m (@ ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lb) | 500g (1.10 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | 591 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 340 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Price at launch | $1,700 | $230 |