Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
Photography Glossary Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both are sold by Olympus. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M1 III was announced 6 years after the TG-2 iHS which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-M1 III scores versus the TG-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery and Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| E-M1 III | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2020 |  | June 2013 | More modern by 81 months |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 610k | Clearer screen (+427k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M1 III
| TG-2 iHS | E-M1 III |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| E-M1 III | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 III has physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 III against the TG-2 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and TG-2 iHS is 67 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes just by researching specs. The image underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 III and TG-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 III having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 III will provide you with extra detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The newer E-M1 III provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2020-02-11 | 2013-06-28 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic IX | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | - |
| Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 610 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 60.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 580 gr (1.28 lb) | 230 gr (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 420 shots | 350 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLH-1 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | - |
| Card slots | 2 | 1 |
| Launch price | $1,800 | $380 |