Clicky

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony W620

Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
96
Overall
75
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony W620 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Revealed February 2020
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1 II
Sony W620
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.2-6.5) lens
  • 116g - 98 x 56 x 20mm
  • Launched January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony W620 Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony W620, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and W620 (14MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and W620 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-M1 III was introduced 8 years later than the W620 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W620 being a Compact camera.

Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the E-M1 III scores vs the W620 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Sony W620

 E-M1 III W620 
LaunchedFebruary 2020January 2012More recent by 99 months
Manually focus More exact focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1037k230kSharper screen (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony W620 over the Olympus E-M1 III

 W620 E-M1 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony W620

 E-M1 III W620 

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony W620 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 III has outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Sony W620 has proportions of 98mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony W620 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 III and the W620.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony W620 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and W620 is 67 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony W620 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony W620 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements simply by checking a spec sheet. The photograph here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 III and W620.

As you can see, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 III having a bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-M1 III will resolve extra detail using its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The younger E-M1 III should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony W620 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony W620 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony W620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III as a Portrait photography camera
Sony W620 as a Portrait photography camera
77
manual focus
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
33
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
provides face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Street photography advice
Sony W620 Street photography advice
78
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
supports touch focus
weather sealing
very good high ISO (25,600)
56
lighter than others in class (116g)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Sports photography features
Sony W620 Sports photography features
81
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 frames/s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
weather sealing
supports phase detect autofocus
32
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
provides tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III as a Travel photography camera
Sony W620 as a Travel photography camera
79
weather sealing
has bluetooth
supports touch focus
resolution is good (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
68
lighter than others in class (116 grams)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse function
does not feature selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Landscape photography info
Sony W620 Landscape photography info
81
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
no anti aliasing filter
very good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
weather sealing
has double storage slots
33
reasonably wide (28mm)
MP count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
missing Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1 III
Vlogging with Sony W620
79
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detect autofocus
video res high (4096 x 2160 pixels)
comes with mic port
30
reasonably wide (28mm)
provides face detect focus
lighter than others in class (116g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony W620 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 III and Sony W620
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-W620
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W620
Type Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2020-02-11 2012-01-10
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic IX BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW photos
Min enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 121 -
Cross type focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.2-6.5
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 1,037k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology - Clear Photo TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 2 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shutter speed 60.0 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.00 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 580g (1.28 lbs) 116g (0.26 lbs)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") 98 x 56 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 420 photos 220 photos
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Two 1
Cost at release $1,800 $102