Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony A65
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
64 Imaging
63 Features
85 Overall
71
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony A65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Launched February 2020
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
- Launched November 2011
- New Model is Sony A68
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony A65 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony A65, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 III (20MP) and the A65 (24MP) is pretty similar but the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and A65 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M1 III was introduced 8 years after the A65 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A65 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-M1 III grades against the A65 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony A65 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Sony SLT-A65. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery and Sony A65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Sony A65
E-M1 III | A65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2020 | November 2011 | More modern by 101 months | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 921k | Crisper screen (+116k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Olympus E-M1 III
A65 | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony A65
E-M1 III | A65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 III offers outer dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Sony A65 has dimensions of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") having a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony A65 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the E-M1 III and the A65.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and A65 is 67 and 64 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes just by reading specifications. The pic here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 III and A65.
To sum up, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 III using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony A65 will deliver more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The younger E-M1 III will have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony A65 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Sony SLT-A65 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Sony SLT-A65 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2020-02-11 | 2011-11-15 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic IX | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 15 |
Cross focus points | 121 | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Number of lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 580 gr (1.28 lbs) | 622 gr (1.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 717 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photographs | 560 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 2 | One |
Retail cost | $1,800 | $700 |