Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ
71 Imaging
53 Features
85 Overall
65
69 Imaging
35 Features
27 Overall
31
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Introduced October 2013
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-420mm (F3.5-5.4) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Replaced the Olympus SP-590 UZ
- Renewed by Olympus SP-610UZ
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are sold by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 (16MP) and SP-600 UZ (12MP) and the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and SP-600 UZ (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M1 was launched 3 years after the SP-600 UZ which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-600 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-M1 grades vs the SP-600 UZ in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 and Olympus SP-600 UZ. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 Gallery and Olympus SP-600 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Olympus SP-600 UZ
E-M1 | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2013 | February 2010 | More modern by 46 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-600 UZ over the Olympus E-M1
SP-600 UZ | E-M1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Olympus SP-600 UZ
E-M1 | SP-600 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 provides exterior measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") and a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Olympus SP-600 UZ has sizing of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 and the SP-600 UZ.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 and SP-600 UZ is 71 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to see the difference between sensor sizes merely by reviewing technical specs. The picture here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 and SP-600 UZ.
As you have seen, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 will offer more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-M1 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus SP-600 UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Olympus SP-600 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Olympus SP-600 UZ |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-10-28 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePIC VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-420mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 1/2s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/320s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497 grams (1.10 pounds) | 455 grams (1.00 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $799 | $189 |