Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FX580
71 Imaging
53 Features
85 Overall
65
95 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FX580 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Introduced October 2013
- Renewed by Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 167g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FX550
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FX580 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic FX580, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 (16MP) and FX580 (12MP) and the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and FX580 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M1 was launched 4 years after the FX580 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX580 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-M1 grades against the FX580 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FX580 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 Gallery & Panasonic FX580 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Panasonic FX580
E-M1 | FX580 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2013 | January 2009 | Newer by 58 months | |
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX580 over the Olympus E-M1
FX580 | E-M1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic FX580
E-M1 | FX580 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FX580 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 has got external measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") and a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Panasonic FX580 has sizing of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic FX580 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 compared to the FX580.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 and FX580 is 71 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FX580 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specs. The pic underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 and FX580.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-M1 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FX580 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic FX580 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX580 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FX550 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-10-28 | 2009-01-27 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePIC VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/320s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 497 gr (1.10 lb) | 167 gr (0.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $799 | $499 |