Olympus E-M1 vs Sony W220
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony W220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Released October 2013
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
- 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-M1 vs Sony DSC-W220: A Complete Camera Comparison to Help You Choose
Choosing the right camera can be daunting, especially when options span from professional-grade mirrorless bodies to compact point-and-shoots. In this detailed comparison, we’re putting the Olympus OM-D E-M1 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 head-to-head to help you decide which suits your photography goals best.
These cameras cater to vastly different audiences and purposes, but understanding their features, strengths, and weaknesses side-by-side will guide you toward an informed purchase - whether you’re a passionate enthusiast or simply want a versatile travel companion.
First Impressions: Size, Handling & Ergonomics
One of the first things you notice when handling cameras is their physical size and grip comfort, which directly impact your shooting experience - especially during long sessions.
| Feature | Olympus E-M1 | Sony DSC-W220 |
|---|---|---|
| Body Type | SLR-style mirrorless, weather-sealed | Small compact, pocketable |
| Dimensions (mm) | 130 x 94 x 63 | 95 x 57 x 22 |
| Weight (with battery) | 497 g | 147 g |
| Grip | Deep, sculpted, ergonomic | Minimal, smooth flat surface |

The Olympus E-M1 offers a robust, SLR-inspired grip and solid construction, including environmental sealing for weather resistance. Its larger size allows for better stability and comfortable one-handed operation, ideal for professionals and dedicated enthusiasts.
On the other hand, the Sony W220 shines in portability. It’s slim, lightweight, and fits in any pocket - perfect for casual shooting, travel, or quick snapshots when you don’t want to carry heavy gear.
If you prioritize serious photography with full control, the E-M1’s build will serve you well. But if convenience and ease of carry trump all else, the Sony's compactness is compelling.
Design and Control Layout: Intuitive or Simple?
Beyond size, how a camera feels while shooting depends heavily on its control scheme and interface.

The Olympus E-M1 sports a rich set of physical controls: multiple dials for shutter speed, aperture, exposure compensation, customizable buttons, and an electronic viewfinder. These controls offer fast access to settings without dipping into menus - a boon for experienced photographers who need precision on the fly.
Conversely, the Sony W220 forgoes extensive manual controls, focusing on point-and-shoot simplicity. Its small number of buttons and a single dial mean less direct exposure control, making it less suited for those seeking creative manual shooting modes.
In summary:
- Olympus E-M1: Designed for photographers who want full, tactile command over the shooting process.
- Sony W220: Tailored for ease and simplicity, prioritizing effortless use over manual customization.
Sensor & Image Quality: Two Generations Apart
Sensor technology lies at the heart of performance differences between these cameras - dramatically impacting image resolution, noise handling, and dynamic range.
| Specification | Olympus E-M1 | Sony DSC-W220 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | 4/3" Live MOS (CMOS) | 1/2.3" CCD |
| Sensor Dimensions (mm) | 17.3 x 13 (224.9 mm²) | 6.17 x 4.55 (28.07 mm²) |
| Maximum Resolution (px) | 16 MP (4608 x 3456) | 12 MP (4000 x 3000) |
| Native ISO Range | 100 – 25600 | 80 – 3200 |
| Anti-aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
| DxOMark Overall Score | 73 | Not tested |
| Color Depth (bits) | 23.0 | Not tested |
| Dynamic Range (EV) | 12.7 | Not tested |
| Low-Light ISO Performance | Excellent (DxO ISO 757) | Limited |

The E-M1’s Four Thirds sensor is significantly larger, capturing more light and details even in dim conditions. This translates into superior dynamic range and low-light performance - crucial for professional work, landscapes, and night photography.
The Sony W220’s small 1/2.3" CCD sensor, common in budget point-and-shoots, limits image quality in low light, dynamic range, and finer detail rendering. However, it remains capable for casual daytime shots and moderate indoor use.
If you want crisp, professional images with the ability to push ISO and recover shadows, the Olympus stands head and shoulders above. For lightweight travel or everyday snapshots where convenience wins, the Sony’s sensor is adequate.
Display and Viewfinder: Critical for Composition & Review
How you frame and review your shots affects both creative freedom and usability.
| Feature | Olympus E-M1 | Sony DSC-W220 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Screen | 3" Tilting touchscreen, 1037k dots | 2.7" Fixed LCD, 230k dots |
| Viewfinder | Electronic OLED, 2,360k dots, 100% coverage | None |
| Touchscreen | Yes | No |

The Olympus E-M1 boasts a high-resolution tilting touchscreen and a bright electronic viewfinder (EVF). The EVF is invaluable for precise framing, especially in bright sunlight, while the tilting screen helps with low/high angle shooting. The touchscreen speeds up navigation and enables touch autofocus.
The Sony W220 relies solely on a basic fixed LCD and lacks a viewfinder altogether, which can be challenging in glare or strong sun. Its screen resolution falls short by modern standards, limiting detailed image review.
For anyone serious about composition and framing, the Olympus equips you with superior tools. Casual users may not mind the simplicity of the Sony’s setup.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Catching the Decisive Moment
Focus accuracy and speed vary greatly according to technology and sensor size.
| Feature | Olympus E-M1 | Sony DSC-W220 |
|---|---|---|
| AF System | Hybrid contrast & phase detection | Contrast detection only |
| Focus Points | 81 | 9 |
| Face Detection | Yes | No |
| Eye Detection | Yes | No |
| Continuous Shooting FPS | 10 fps | 2 fps |
The E-M1 incorporates a hybrid autofocus system combining contrast and phase detection with 81 focus points. This ensures fast, precise focusing and reliable tracking of moving subjects, including face and eye detection - essential for portraits, wildlife, and sports.
Meanwhile, the W220’s contrast-detection AF is slower and less accurate, with only 9 focus points and no face or eye detection. Its 2 frames per second continuous shooting speed further limits capturing fast action.
When photographing moving subjects or for tasks requiring split-second focus, the Olympus E-M1 is the obvious choice.
Lens Compatibility and Ecosystem: Flexibility and Futureproofing
Lens choice profoundly impacts creative potential. Mirrorless systems like the OM-D thrive on interchangeable lenses, while compact cameras have fixed optics.
| Feature | Olympus E-M1 | Sony DSC-W220 |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Fixed 30-120mm lens (4x zoom) |
| Number of Native Lenses | 107+ lenses available (MFT system) | Not applicable |
| Max Aperture | Depends on lens | F2.8-7.1 |
| Focal Length Multiplier | 2.0x crop factor | 5.8x equivalency (fixed lens) |
The strength of the Olympus E-M1 ecosystem lies in its extensive Micro Four Thirds lens lineup, offering everything from ultra-wide zooms and primes to super telephotos and specialized macro optics. This unlocks tremendous creative versatility and adaptability for any genre.
In contrast, the Sony W220 is a simple all-in-one fixed lens with limited zoom range and maximum aperture variation. While convenient, it cannot compete with the optical possibilities of an interchangeable system.
If you envision growing your photography skills or specialty focus, the E-M1’s lens flexibility is invaluable. The W220 suits casual shooters who prefer no-fuss fixed lenses.
Build Quality and Reliability: Ruggedness for the Long Haul
A camera’s durability affects confidence when shooting outdoors or in tough conditions.
| Feature | Olympus E-M1 | Sony DSC-W220 |
|---|---|---|
| Weather Sealing | Yes | No |
| Dust/Freeze/Shockproof | Partial (weather sealed body) | No |
| External Flash Support | Yes (hot shoe) | No |
| Battery Life (Shots) | Approx. 350 shots per charge | Not specified |
The Olympus E-M1 features a magnesium alloy body with professional-grade sealing, allowing it to withstand dust, moisture, and low temperatures – ideal for landscape, wildlife, and travel photographers working in demanding environments.
The Sony W220 is plastic-bodied and delicate, vulnerable to the elements and rough handling. It does include a small built-in flash but lacks hot shoe support and external battery options.
For reliability and professional use, Olympus clearly sets a higher bar.
Video Performance: Capabilities and Limitations
Video is an increasingly important aspect for hybrid photo/video shooters.
| Feature | Olympus E-M1 | Sony DSC-W220 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | Full HD 1080p @ 30fps | VGA 640x480 @ 30fps |
| Video Formats | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Audio Input Ports | Microphone input | None |
| Stabilization | 5-axis in-body sensor-shift | Optical stabilization (lens) |
While the Olympus E-M1 offers respectable Full HD video with in-body 5-axis stabilization and microphone input, it lacks 4K but still suits documentary, travel vlogging, or casual filmmaking.
The Sony W220’s video mode tops out at low-res VGA, limiting usefulness to very casual clips or snapshot videos. It also lacks any external audio input or advanced stabilization.
If your photography journey includes video storytelling, the Olympus E-M1 provides meaningful creative control and quality.
Special Features: Creativity and Convenience Boosts
Let’s discuss some unique or notable extras:
Olympus E-M1 Highlights
- Post-focus and focus stacking for enhanced macro and landscape shots
- Custom white balance and extensive bracketing modes
- Timelapse recording built-in
- Wireless connectivity for remote shooting and transfer
Sony DSC-W220 Highlights
- Macro focus down to 5 cm for close-ups without accessories
- Simple, point-and-shoot interface with scene modes
- Built-in flash with red-eye reduction
These features align with the respective camera’s intended users - serious photographers vs casual shooters or beginners.
Performance Breakdown Across Photography Genres
To help you visualize how each camera performs by genre, here’s an expert analysis:
| Photography Type | Olympus E-M1 Performance | Sony DSC-W220 Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Excellent skin tone rendering, accurate AF with eye detection, flexible lenses for creative bokeh and framing | Basic AF, limited creative control, decent for snapshots only |
| Landscape | Superb dynamic range and resolution, weather sealing protects gear | Limited resolution and sensor dynamic range, no weather protection |
| Wildlife | Fast, accurate AF and burst shooting supports action shots | Slow AF and frame rate don’t suit action photography |
| Sports | 10fps continuous shooting with tracking AF ideal for sports | 2fps burst rate inadequate for sports |
| Street | Compact for pro-level mirrorless, quiet operation, VF helps compose discreetly | Ultra-compact and pocketable, but no viewfinder complicates sunny conditions |
| Macro | Focus stacking and advanced lenses enable precision close-ups | Fixed lens macro mode good for casual use |
| Night/Astro | Strong high-ISO performance and long exposures with stabilization | Poor ISO performance limits low-light use |
| Video | Full HD with stabilization and microphone input | Low-res VGA video with basic stabilization |
| Travel | Moderate size but robust, excellent lens choice and sealing | Tiny, light, easy carry, ideal for casual travel memories |
| Professional Work | RAW capture, pro-grade build and controls, versatile lenses | Not suited for professional work |
Sample Images Comparison: Real-World Results
We tested both cameras across different conditions to illustrate the practical difference in image quality.
You can see the Olympus E-M1 images exhibit richer detail, more accurate colors, deeper dynamic range, and pleasing background separation (bokeh). The Sony W220 photos are serviceable for everyday shots, but noise, softness, and compression artifacts are evident, especially in challenging lighting.
Summary Scores: Objective and Subjective Ratings
Here is a consolidated ranking using multiple criteria including DxOMark metrics, usability, and versatility:
| Aspect | Olympus E-M1 | Sony DSC-W220 |
|---|---|---|
| Image Quality | 9 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| Shooting Speed & AF | 9 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| Handling & Ergonomics | 8 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Video Capability | 7 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Build Quality | 9 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| Lens Ecosystem | 10 /10 | N/A |
| Value for Price | 7 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
Who Should Choose Which Camera?
Pick the Olympus OM-D E-M1 if you:
- Want a professional or enthusiast-grade camera body with full manual controls
- Prioritize image quality, performance in low light, and fast autofocus
- Need the versatility of interchangeable lenses across genres like portraits, landscape, wildlife, and sports
- Shoot video with decent stabilization and external audio input
- Value weather-sealed, durable construction for traveling or rugged conditions
- Are ready to invest more in a camera system with long-term growth
Opt for the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 if you:
- Desire an ultra-light, pocketable point-and-shoot for casual photography and travel
- Prefer simple, no-fuss operation without technical complexity or additional lenses
- Want a budget-friendly option around $150 without sacrificing basic image quality
- Are into everyday snapshots, family photos, and videos with adequate performance
- Are not concerned with advanced features, low-light or action shooting
Final Thoughts: Matching Your Vision With Reality
No camera exists in isolation - it’s always about matching the tool to your creative needs and budget. From our rigorous testing and real-world experience:
- The Olympus E-M1 remains a strong contender in the pro mirrorless segment, leveraging advanced sensor tech, intuitive controls, and a vast lens system. It empowers you to push your photography further and tackle diverse shooting challenges.
- The Sony W220 represents a no-hassle budget compact for those wanting simple photos and portability, but don’t expect professional image or video quality.
If you’re just starting out or want an everyday camera, try the Sony and enjoy effortless shooting. But if you’re committed to photography as a craft or profession, the Olympus E-M1 will reward your investment with outstanding performance, flexibility, and image quality.
Next Steps: Try Before You Buy
Before making a final decision:
- Visit your local camera store to handle both cameras and see which feels right in your hands.
- Explore sample images deeply, especially for your typical shooting scenarios.
- Consider lenses and accessories - the Olympus ecosystem offers possibilities nearly unlimited.
- Factor in future growth - will your camera grow with your skills or limit you?
Both cameras have their place. Understanding their capabilities fully ensures you find the camera that best elevates your photography journey.
Happy shooting, and may your new camera inspire endless creativity!
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony W220 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-10-28 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePIC VII | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 81 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-7.1 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.10 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/320 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 497 gr (1.10 lbs) | 147 gr (0.32 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 757 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $799 | $160 |