Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6010
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3be10/3be1075d35d6ec5ee027d640297ca7ce28c3fabb" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Introduced August 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Also Known as mju Tough 6010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6010 Overview
Below is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus 6010, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and 6010 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and 6010 (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-M10 II was introduced 6 years later than the 6010 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 6010 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-M10 II grades vs the 6010 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6010 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus Stylus Tough 6010. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus 6010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus 6010
E-M10 II | 6010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2015 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 75 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6010 over the Olympus E-M10 II
6010 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus 6010
E-M10 II | 6010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6010 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera often, you should think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II features outer measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Olympus 6010 has specifications of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus 6010 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 II compared to the 6010.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30f96/30f9630b4a3b69710c2216b396e7fa8504d018d0" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6010 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6010 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and 6010 is 82 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac638/ac63867dcbd7fefd4a5b902aaba9a04204b927dc" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6010 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6010 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6010 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements merely by going over specifications. The photograph below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and 6010.
To sum up, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II with its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will deliver more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe13b/fe13bf33030603497c26b3b999f6829da8ab49dd" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6010 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6010 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6010 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55945/559454b3eb05c794511283cc1ee9b7916faac6ae" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6010 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus Tough 6010 |
Alternate name | - | mju Tough 6010 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2015-08-25 | 2009-07-17 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | - | 2cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 1/4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 lbs) | 179 grams (0.39 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | LI-50C |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $499 | $0 |