Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6020
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6020
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Below is a in depth review of the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus 6020, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both are offered by Olympus. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and 6020 (13MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and 6020 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M10 II was released 5 years later than the 6020 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the E-M10 II scores vs the 6020 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus 6020
E-M10 II | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2015 | February 2010 | More recent by 68 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Olympus E-M10 II
6020 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus 6020
E-M10 II | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 II features physical measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has proportions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus 6020 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 II against the 6020.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and 6020 is 82 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing a spec sheet. The visual here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and 6020.
Clearly, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 3MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The newer E-M10 II will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
Otherwise known as | - | mju Tough 6020 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2015-08-25 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 13MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 lb) | 122 gr (0.27 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $499 | $279 |