Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-3
Portability
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus TG-3
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Released March 2014
- Successor is Olympus TG-4
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-3, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both are manufactured by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the TG-3 (16MP) is very comparable but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and TG-3 (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M10 II was launched 18 months later than the TG-3 making them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M10 II scores vs the TG-3 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Olympus Tough TG-3. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus TG-3
| E-M10 II | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2015 |  | March 2014 | Fresher by 18 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus E-M10 II
| TG-3 | E-M10 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-3
| E-M10 II | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II provides physical dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-3 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the E-M10 II and the TG-3.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and TG-3 is 82 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing only by checking out specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and TG-3.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have the same MP but different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II has the larger sensor which will make obtaining shallower depth of field less difficult. The younger E-M10 II provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography info
Olympus TG-3 Portrait photography info
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has face detection focusing
exports RAW files
resolution is good (16MP)
includes face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-3 as a Street photography camera
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
comes with touch to focus
great ISO range (25,600)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
more heavy than competition in class (247 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II Sports photography advice
Olympus TG-3 Sports photography advice
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
lacks phase detect AF
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
environment proof
good battery power (330 shots)
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II Travel photography info
Olympus TG-3 Travel photography info
comes with touch to focus
good megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
display isn't selfie friendly
good battery power (330 shots)
environment proof
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competition in class (247g)
display isn't selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II Landscape photography highlights
Olympus TG-3 Landscape photography highlights
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
decently wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
environment proof
good battery power (330 CIPA)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 II
Vlogging with Olympus TG-3
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
missing external microphone support
decently wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of external microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (247 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2015-08-25 | 2014-03-31 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 81 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 390g (0.86 lbs) | 247g (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 pictures | 330 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $499 | $350 |
