Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP5
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88bb5/88bb5d6cdc2c05845f07f48bf0fd556e603fdf8e" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5 front"
95 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 141g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
- Revealed January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP5 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP5, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the FP5 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and FP5 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M10 II was introduced 4 years after the FP5 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FP5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-M10 II matches up against the FP5 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Panasonic FP5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic FP5
E-M10 II | FP5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2015 | ![]() | January 2011 | More modern by 57 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP5 over the Olympus E-M10 II
FP5 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FP5
E-M10 II | FP5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP5 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 II offers exterior dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Panasonic FP5 has proportions of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP5 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 II against the FP5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2419e/2419ed0df32715b5386c1392b14803d8c02c2694" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP5 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP5 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and FP5 is 82 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da1e7/da1e7b43b98046a06f89d54a68c8c70613d7fee0" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP5 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP5 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by checking specs. The image below may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and FP5.
All in all, each of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 II with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will give more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 II will have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/005ac/005acf33b5187642b2e89b342f678f4d55b783d5" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP5 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0436b/0436b55cce228b1152a24410fb8adf9d145ffbb4" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP5 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2015-08-25 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Touch Screen LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 4.90 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lb) | 141g (0.31 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | 260 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $499 | $199 |