Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic TS25
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48562/48562f9848cd202fb074278220c813bfb6a7777a" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS25 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS25 front"
95 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic TS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Announced August 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M10
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 144g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2013
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FT25
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic TS25 Overview
The following is a thorough comparison of the Olympus E-M10 II versus Panasonic TS25, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the TS25 (16MP) is pretty well matched but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and TS25 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M10 II was brought out 2 years after the TS25 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic TS25 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-M10 II grades versus the TS25 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic TS25 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS25. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Panasonic TS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic TS25
E-M10 II | TS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2015 | ![]() | January 2013 | Newer by 32 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic TS25 over the Olympus E-M10 II
TS25 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic TS25
E-M10 II | TS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic TS25 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys external dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Panasonic TS25 has dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 II versus Panasonic TS25 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 II against the TS25.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18880/188808e9551bc48861f6e7e81353b6b5a8c733b3" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic TS25 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic TS25 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and TS25 is 82 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c884c/c884c9cf8eb7efb7a9dae8671faded65ef4826a8" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic TS25 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic TS25 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic TS25 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to see the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by checking a spec sheet. The image below might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and TS25.
Clearly, each of the cameras offer the same exact megapixel count albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II features the bigger sensor which should make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult. The more recent E-M10 II is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/904a2/904a27631be2d6f110b1c0fd74300eb3281dd631" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic TS25 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic TS25 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic TS25 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15e42/15e4200da831bdfb9abfb766c7910a7e9c82cbfe" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic TS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic TS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic TS25 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS25 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FT25 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2015-08-25 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1300 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 4.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 lb) | 144 grams (0.32 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 250 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $499 | $180 |