Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 II
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/376a8/376a854d97b2e287bdc42f8b91c8e24498c40056" alt="Pentax K-1 Mark II front Pentax K-1 Mark II front"
55 Imaging
77 Features
82 Overall
79
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 36MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 819200
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF4 Mount
- 1010g - 137 x 110 x 86mm
- Launched February 2018
- Superseded the Pentax K-1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 II Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 II, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Pentax. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and K-1 II (36MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and K-1 II (Full frame) provide different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M10 II was brought out 3 years before the K-1 II which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-1 II being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-M10 II matches up versus the K-1 II for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 II Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Pentax K-1 Mark II. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Pentax K-1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Pentax K-1 II
E-M10 II | K-1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1037k | Crisper display (+3k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-1 II over the Olympus E-M10 II
K-1 II | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2018 | ![]() | August 2015 | Newer by 30 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Display dimensions | 3.2" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Pentax K-1 II
E-M10 II | K-1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 II Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II comes with outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Pentax K-1 II has dimensions of 137mm x 110mm x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") and a weight of 1010 grams (2.23 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 II in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 II against the K-1 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd1b0/dd1b08037a5c22b59dfafe72552dbd41d4412a80" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 II size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 II size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and K-1 II is 82 and 55 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46538/46538957837a9c31d7bd243794388cad91f1dd61" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 II top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 II top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 II Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by checking out specs. The picture below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and K-1 II.
All in all, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Pentax K-1 II will show more detail having its extra 20MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-M10 II will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/022f1/022f10f4d471ac7e0190f6dcb829d920676752ec" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 II sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 II sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf881/cf88161b9ad399eb5dffa85641f9e3a3b46572ee" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-1 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Pentax K-1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Pentax K-1 Mark II |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2015-08-25 | 2018-02-22 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | PRIME IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 36 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 7360 x 4912 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 819200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 33 |
Cross type focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF4 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.2 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 4.4fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/200s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Auto Flash Discharge, Auto Flash + Red-eye Reduction, Flash On, Flash On + Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync + Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, Contrast-control-sync, High-speed sync, Wireless sync |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 pounds) | 1010 grams (2.23 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 137 x 110 x 86mm (5.4" x 4.3" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | 670 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) |
Card slots | Single | Two |
Launch cost | $499 | $1,737 |