Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12

Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 front
Portability
84
Imaging
53
Features
39
Overall
47

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Revealed August 2015
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 III
Ricoh GXR Mount A12
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1/9000s Max Shutter
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
  • Released August 2011
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview

The following is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) have different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M10 II was introduced 4 years after the GXR Mount A12 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-M10 II matches up against the GXR Mount A12 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12

 E-M10 II GXR Mount A12 
ReleasedAugust 2015August 2011Newer by 50 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k920kSharper screen (+120k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 GXR Mount A12 E-M10 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Ricoh GXR Mount A12

 E-M10 II GXR Mount A12 
Manually focus Dial exact focus
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurements
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II offers outer measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has measurements of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") having a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 II against the GXR Mount A12.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and GXR Mount A12 is 82 and 84 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing technical specs. The picture below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and GXR Mount A12.

As you can tell, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will offer more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer E-M10 II provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography factors
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Portrait photography factors
72
focusing manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
55
focusing manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
does not have liveview
MP count low (12 megapixels)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Street photography with Ricoh GXR Mount A12
83
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
has touch to focus
above average ISO range (25,600)
65
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Sports photography information
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sports photography information
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
39
great max shutter speed (1/9,000 seconds)
good sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
does not have liveview
max fps low (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
has no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Travel photography highlights
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Travel photography highlights
73
has touch to focus
good megapixels (16MP)
flash built-in
display is not selfie friendly
60
built-in flash
fast maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Timelapse function
MP count low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Landscape photography with Ricoh GXR Mount A12
79
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
52
focusing manually
fast maximum aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
does not have liveview
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't have Timelapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Vlogging info
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Vlogging info
35
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection focus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
no external mic socket
26
fast maximum aperture (f)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IIRicoh GXR Mount A12
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Ricoh GXR Mount A12
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2015-08-25 2011-08-05
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VII -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 2848
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 200
RAW support
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 81 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - ()
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,040k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 1 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/9000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 8.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (ISO 100) 9.60 m
Flash options Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 390g (0.86 pounds) 370g (0.82 pounds)
Physical dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.5 not tested
DXO Low light rating 842 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 photographs 330 photographs
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 DB-90
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes (5 sec, custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Price at launch $499 $349