Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Revealed August 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Released August 2011
Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview
The following is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) have different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M10 II was introduced 4 years after the GXR Mount A12 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-M10 II matches up against the GXR Mount A12 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Ricoh GXR Mount A12. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
E-M10 II | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2015 | August 2011 | Newer by 50 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Sharper screen (+120k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Olympus E-M10 II
GXR Mount A12 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
E-M10 II | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II offers outer measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has measurements of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") having a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 II against the GXR Mount A12.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and GXR Mount A12 is 82 and 84 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions just by reviewing technical specs. The picture below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and GXR Mount A12.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will offer more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer E-M10 II provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2015-08-25 | 2011-08-05 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | () |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/9000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 9.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 pounds) | 370g (0.82 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | 330 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (5 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $499 | $349 |