Clicky

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-310

Portability
81
Imaging
63
Features
83
Overall
71
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front
 
Olympus TG-310 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
33
Overall
35

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
  • Announced August 2020
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus TG-310
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Released January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-310 Overview

Here is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Olympus TG-310, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both are built by Olympus. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and TG-310 (14MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and TG-310 (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M10 IV was introduced 9 years later than the TG-310 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.

Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-M10 IV scores vs the TG-310 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus TG-310

 E-M10 IV TG-310 
ReleasedAugust 2020January 2011Fresher by 117 months
Manual focus Very accurate focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1040k230kSharper screen (+810k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus E-M10 IV

 TG-310 E-M10 IV 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus TG-310

 E-M10 IV TG-310 

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 IV provides external dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-310 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-M10 IV versus Olympus TG-310 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 IV vs the TG-310.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 IV and TG-310 is 81 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading technical specs. The graphic underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 IV and TG-310.

As you have seen, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 IV with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 IV will deliver greater detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The younger E-M10 IV provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Portrait photography factors
Olympus TG-310 Portrait photography factors
77
has manual focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
33
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
includes face detect autofocus
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Street photography details
Olympus TG-310 Street photography details
84
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
features touch focus
very good ISO range (25,600)
66
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Sports photography features
Olympus TG-310 Sports photography features
73
quiet shooting (1/16,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
no phase detect autofocus
40
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
includes tracking focus
environment proof
low frames per second (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
low battery life (150 shots)
has no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Travel photography advice
Olympus TG-310 Travel photography advice
85
supports bluetooth
features touch focus
resolution is good (20MP)
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
67
lighter than competition in class (155 grams)
environment proof
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
low battery life (150 shots)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Landscape photography advice
Olympus TG-310 Landscape photography advice
83
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
39
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
environment proof
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
low battery life (150 per charge)
doesn't have Timelapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Vlogging info
Olympus TG-310 Vlogging info
78
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection autofocus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
missing external microphone port
32
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect autofocus
lighter than competition in class (155g)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus TG-310
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IVOlympus TG-310
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV Olympus TG-310
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Announced 2020-08-04 2011-01-06
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 25600 1600
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW support
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 121 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-102mm (3.6x)
Highest aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 1,040 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shutter rate 8.7 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 7.20 m (at ISO 200) 4.20 m
Flash modes Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 383 gr (0.84 lb) 155 gr (0.34 lb)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 360 photographs 150 photographs
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $699 $0