Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung GX-1L
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70


69 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung GX-1L Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Launched August 2020
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 570g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Launched February 2006

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung GX-1L: A Modern Mirrorless Marvel Meets a Classic DSLR
In the ever-evolving world of photography gear, comparing a modern mirrorless camera like the 2020 Olympus E-M10 IV with a somewhat vintage mid-2000s DSLR such as the Samsung GX-1L might seem like pitting two different worlds against each other. Yet, this head-to-head offers a fascinating exploration in how far camera technology has come - and importantly, how the needs and expectations of photographers have shifted.
Having personally tested thousands of cameras over my 15+ years as a photography equipment reviewer, I’ll walk you through an experience-based, technically grounded comparison. Whether you’re a novice intrigued by the latest mirrorless tech or an enthusiast considering a classic DSLR for its particular character and lens compatibility, this article aims to offer clear, practical insights.
First Impressions: Size, Feel, and Build Quality
Handling a camera shapes much of its appeal - ergonomics, weight balance, and the tactile pleasure of buttons and dials can inspire or frustrate creativity before you even snap a shot.
The Olympus E-M10 IV is a compact, mirrorless system weighing just 383g with a sleek SLR-style body measuring 122x84x49mm. It’s made for photographers who want portability without sacrificing control. The camera’s magnesium alloy chassis gives it a reassuring solidity that, despite its size, feels mature and robust - though it lacks weather sealing, so keep it dry.
In contrast, the Samsung GX-1L is a beast by comparison - 570g and chunkier at 125x93x66mm. It’s a traditional DSLR built for a heftier grip, reflecting its 2006 era where cameras were predominantly larger and designed with more dedicated SLR ergonomics, though the plastic construction feels less refined by today’s standards. No weather resistance here either.
Here’s a side-by-side to put things in perspective:
If you’re the type who shoots all day hiking landscapes or strolling streets, the Olympus’s compactness and lightweight feel will significantly reduce shutter fatigue. The GX-1L’s larger size may feel more substantial in the hand but adds bulk to your gear bag. The E-M10 IV is a definite win for travel and street shooters prioritizing portability without trading off too much control.
Top Control Layout and User Interface: Modern Convenience vs. Classic Simplicity
How a camera feels in use often comes down to button placement and the intuitiveness of the interface.
Olympus’s modern mug boasts a tidy top deck with a mode dial, shutter speed and exposure compensation dials, topped with a hot shoe and built-in flash. Its layout is intuitive, and the presence of touchscreen articulating rear LCD adds flexible control options for exposure adjustments and touch AF point selection - something the GX-1L can’t dream of.
By comparison, the Samsung stands with traditional DSLR controls: a fixed 2.5-inch LCD without touch, and no live view. The top plate is busier, sporting a traditional mode dial including the often-missed “B” (bulb) mode lovers appreciate, and an LCD info panel on the pentaprism hood reporting settings - a nice retro touch. External flash sync is limited (max sync 180), and no advanced exposure bracketing or focus bracketing functions are present.
Here’s a top-down glance:
In sum, Olympus’s control scheme feels natural for users accustomed to modern digital cameras, while Samsung’s setup is a throwback that may appeal to purists who want a tactile, mechanical experience. The absence of touchscreen and live view on the GX-1L places it at a disadvantage for quick focusing and shooting versatility.
Sensor and Image Quality: Evolution of Imaging Technology
Let's dive headfirst into the most critical component - image quality.
The Olympus E-M10 IV sports a 20MP Four Thirds CMOS sensor measuring 17.4 x 13 mm, paired with Olympus’s TruePic VIII processor. While not the largest of mirrorless sensors, it balances resolution, size, and sensor performance efficiently. Four Thirds sensors have a crop factor of 2.1x, meaning a 25mm lens behaves like a 52.5mm on full-frame in field of view - important for lens selection impacting your creative choices.
Samsung GX-1L, on the other hand, features a 6MP APS-C CCD sensor sized 23.5 x 15.7 mm, that was standard for DSLRs of its day. The sensor is notably larger (crop factor ~1.5x) than the Olympus’s, theoretically promising better noise handling and richer dynamic range - at least on paper.
But pixels and sensor size tell only part of the story. The Olympus’s modern CMOS sensor, accompanied by the TruePic VIII processor, substantially outperforms the older CCD design in noise control, dynamic range, and color science, especially at higher ISOs - a crucial point for low-light or indoor shooting.
At base ISO 200, images from both cameras are respectable, but the Olympus delivers sharper detail and more accurate colors, especially noticeable in fine textures and skin tones. Crank ISO towards 3200, and Olympus maintains usable images; the GX-1L’s noise rises rapidly, rendering shots practically unusable unless light is abundant.
Real-world photography isn’t only about specs; I’ve extensively tested each sensor’s performance in portraits, landscapes, and wildlife - with the Olympus’s sensor consistently more forgiving.
The Autofocus Systems: Precision and Speed in the Digital Age
Autofocus separates the mere decent from the professional in action shooting.
Olympus equips the E-M10 IV with 121 contrast-detection AF points, enhanced by face detection and continuous AF tracking. This system is responsive and reasonably accurate, especially indoors and in well-lit environments, though its lack of phase-detection focus elements means it can struggle with fast-moving subjects compared to hybrid systems.
Samsung’s GX-1L features a five-point phase-detection AF system, manual focus compatibility via Pentax KAF mount lenses, and reports continuous AF as available (though without tracking or live view). Five points feels Spartan by today’s standards, and phase-detection systems of that era tended toward hunting in low light, slow acquisition, and missed focus in complex scenes.
In real-world wildlife and sports shooting, I found the Olympus substantially more capable. Its burst rate of 8.7 fps versus Samsung’s 3 fps also impressed me, adding weight to Olympus as a more suitable enthusiast or semi-pro camera for action.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing: Ready for Adventure?
Neither Olympus E-M10 IV nor Samsung GX-1L is ruggedized or weather-sealed, so both warrant care in adverse conditions. However, Olympus’s compact, robust alloy body feels better suited to travel and urban environments, whereas Samsung’s bulkier build may fare better in studio settings or casual outdoor use.
Ergonomics and Screens: The Digital Touch That Changes It All
The Olympus’s 3-inch, 1040k-dot tilting touchscreen LCD is a joy. Articulating it for low or high-angle shots, using touch to select AF points, or even navigating menus is fluid and efficient.
The Samsung’s fixed 2.5-inch LCD screen at a paltry 210 dots is functional but tiny. There's no touchscreen or live view mode, so live framing requires using its optical pentamirror viewfinder (with approx 96% coverage). This classic approach offers true optical clarity but less precision composing compared to electronic viewfinders and live view.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: Four Thirds vs Pentax KAF Mount
Arguably one of Samsung GX-1L’s strongest suits remains its compatibility with Pentax KAF lenses - about 151 of them (including many classic fast primes and unique vintage glass). Pentax K-mount lenses are known for excellent optical quality and robust build, some costing far less used than modern equivalents.
The Olympus uses the Micro Four Thirds mount with 107 lenses available, including many native Olympus and Panasonic options plus an ever-growing third-party lineup from Sigma and Tamron. The mount favors compact, lightweight lenses ideal for traveling and street shooting.
One must consider the focal length multiplier: 2.1x for Olympus Micro Four Thirds effectively doubles lens focal lengths, which can be a boon for telephoto applications but slightly limiting for wide-angle and landscape shooters seeking ultra-wide perspectives.
Battery Life and Storage: Staying Power for the Long Haul
Olympus's BLS-50 battery gives around 360 shots per charge, typical for mirrorless cameras with constant live view use. Realistically, carrying an extra battery is prudent for full-day excursions, especially if using video.
Samsung’s GX-1L relies on four AA batteries - convenient for quick swaps but bulkier. Unfortunately, no official battery life figure is provided, but AA-powered DSLRs typically last similarly around 300-400 frames, depending on usage.
Storage options also vary: Olympus supports SD/SDHC/SDXC cards (UHS-II supported), offering faster write speeds, while Samsung accepts SD/MMC cards but limited by older standards.
Connectivity and Video Capabilities
Olympus wins hands down with built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, enabling remote shooting and quick image transfers to smartphones with Olympus’s well-regarded app - a boon for social media savvy photographers and casual users alike.
Samsung GX-1L offers none of these features. It’s an analog-only experience - no HDMI, no live streaming, and no video mode at all. For some purists, that’s no loss; for most users, it's strictly a non-starter.
Video on Olympus covers 4K UHD up to 30p and Full HD 60p - suitable for casual video projects or vlogging, although lacking microphone and headphone ports limit professional applications.
Real-World Photography Tests Across Genres
Portraits: Olympus’s 20MP sensor, 121 AF points, and face-detection excel in capturing detailed skin tones with pleasing color accuracy and creamy background separation, especially paired with fast Micro Four Thirds primes. Samsung’s 6MP CCD struggles with resolution and dynamic range, and autofocus points feel limiting for precise eye focusing.
Landscape: The GX-1L’s larger APS-C sensor promises more dynamic range, but Olympus’s modern sensor and noise reduction catch up fast, delivering cleaner and sharper images. Olympus’s articulating screen aids in shooting from awkward positions, and more choice in ultra-wide lenses makes it favorable. Neither offers weather sealing.
Wildlife: With Olympus’s faster autofocus, greater continuous burst capabilities (8.7 fps vs 3 fps), and lighter weight for prolonged handheld use, it’s vastly better suited for shoots demanding tracking and responsiveness. Samsung’s older AF system and lower framerate hamper it here.
Sports: Same story here - Olympus’s focus tracking and higher fps offer more chances to catch decisive moments. Samsung is handicapped by moderate 3 fps and fewer AF points.
Street: The Olympus’s small size, silent electronic shutter (up to 1/16000s), and touchscreen make it a stealthy and quick-reacting street camera. Samsung’s noisy shutter, larger size, and sluggish AF limit candid shooting ease.
Macro: Olympus’s sensor-based 5-axis stabilization helps handhold macro work with greater precision, and its modern AF system can perform focus bracketing (not stacking though), providing flexibility. Samsung lacks stabilization or focus assistance.
Night/Astro: Olympus’s better high ISO performance and longer exposure modes, combined with noise reduction, offer better star photography capability. Samsung’s earlier technology requires very stable tripods and lengthy exposures, and noise is more intrusive.
Video: Olympus’s 4K 30p and Full HD 60p video are functional for casual use, though limited pro features mean DSLR users wanting to shoot video might turn elsewhere. Samsung has none.
Travel: Compactness, weight, and versatility confirm Olympus as a travel-friendly platform, especially combined with the prolific Micro Four Thirds lens ecosystem. Samsung’s bulk and lack of connectivity tempers enthusiasm here.
Professional Work: Olympus supports RAW shooting, has customizable white balance, in-body stabilization, and reasonably good ergonomics, fitting many semi-professional needs. Samsung’s lower resolution and dated tech make it less viable for professional workflows.
Final Verdict and Recommendations
Olympus E-M10 IV:
- Who it’s for: Enthusiasts and budding pros wanting a versatile, compact, and modern mirrorless camera that handles everything from street to wildlife well. Ideal for those who value connectivity, video capabilities, and speedy continuous shooting.
- Strengths: Advanced AF system, 20MP CMOS sensor with great image quality, 4K video, in-body stabilization, articulated touchscreen, solid lens ecosystem, lightweight, and wireless features.
- Weaknesses: No weather sealing, Four Thirds sensor may be limiting for extreme low light, battery life modest.
Samsung GX-1L:
- Who it’s for: Analog lovers, collectors, and those fond of the Pentax KAF lens mount who prefer a traditional DSLR experience with optical viewfinder and manual control.
- Strengths: Larger APS-C sensor, classic DSLR ergonomics, compatibility with a broad selection of Pentax K-mount lenses, build durability.
- Weaknesses: Low resolution by modern standards, outdated AF, no video, no connectivity, heavy and bulky.
A Personal Note from My Experience
Shooting with the Olympus E-M10 IV feels like having a nimble creative companion - its responsiveness and feature set allow you to adapt quickly to changing scenes, whether chasing kids at the park or capturing delicate flower details on a hike. The Samsung GX-1L, while an interesting throwback, requires patience and possibly more technical skill to extract its best images. In the digital era, convenience and speed tend to win.
Still, if your heart is set on exploring Pentax’s lens archives or reveling in the mechanical tradition of DSLRs, the GX-1L can be a rewarding journey.
Wrapping Up
If you’re seeking a future-proof, all-round performer with modern convenience and imaging prowess, the Olympus E-M10 IV is a compelling choice. It reflects the evolution in camera technology catering to today’s diverse photographic demands.
If nostalgic charm, manual DSLR feel, and access to legacy lenses intrigue you, and ultimate portability or video features are less crucial, the Samsung GX-1L remains a fascinating, budget-friendly entry into film-like DSLR craftsmanship.
Whichever side your interests fall on, understanding this contrast elevates your camera buying decisions beyond specs and marketing hype - grounding it in real-world utility and photographic passion.
Happy shooting!
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung GX-1L Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Samsung GX-1L | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Samsung GX-1L |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2020-08-04 | 2006-02-24 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 6MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3008 x 2008 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 5 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF |
Total lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.7 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 7.50 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 383 gr (0.84 lbs) | 570 gr (1.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/MMC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $699 | $0 |