Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Released August 2017
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Here is a thorough overview of the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus TG-2 iHS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both are designed by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M10 III was released 4 years later than the TG-2 iHS and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the E-M10 III grades against the TG-2 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-M10 III | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2017 | June 2013 | Fresher by 51 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 610k | Sharper screen (+430k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 III
TG-2 iHS | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-M10 III | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III has got outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus TG-2 iHS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 III vs the TG-2 iHS.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and TG-2 iHS is 80 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to see the difference between sensor sizing simply by going over technical specs. The graphic underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and TG-2 iHS.
As you have seen, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2017-08-31 | 2013-06-28 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 610k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 350 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $650 | $380 |