Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ50W

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Samsung HZ50W front
Portability
70
Imaging
36
Features
44
Overall
39

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Released August 2017
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
  • New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Samsung HZ50W
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
  • Launched May 2010
  • Other Name is WB5500
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ50W Overview

Below is a complete review of the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung HZ50W, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the HZ50W (14MP) is fairly close but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and HZ50W (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The E-M10 III was released 7 years later than the HZ50W and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-M10 III scores against the HZ50W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Samsung HZ50W

 E-M10 III HZ50W 
LaunchedAugust 2017May 2010More recent by 90 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k230kCrisper display (+810k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Olympus E-M10 III

 HZ50W E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung HZ50W

 E-M10 III HZ50W 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Display size3"3"Same display measurement
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison

When you are intending to lug around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III features outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Samsung HZ50W has proportions of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung HZ50W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 III vs the HZ50W.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ50W size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and HZ50W is 80 and 70 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ50W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements merely by looking through technical specs. The visual here may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and HZ50W.

As you can tell, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 III will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 III should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ50W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography factors
Samsung HZ50W Portrait photography factors
73
you can focus manually
MP count good (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
45
has manual focus
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
delivers RAW files
external flash not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Street photography camera
Samsung HZ50W as a Street photography camera
77
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
features touch focus
very good high ISO (25,600)
more heavy than competitors (410g)
55
has image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Sports photography camera
Samsung HZ50W as a Sports photography camera
69
quiet mode (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
no phase detect autofocus
48
excellent zoom range (26-676mm 26.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (14MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography factors
Samsung HZ50W Travel photography factors
67
features touch focus
MP count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
more heavy than competitors (410g)
display isn't selfie friendly
58
resolution is good (14MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (26mm)
long zoom (676mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
does not have selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung HZ50W as a Landscape photography camera
80
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
51
has manual focus
relatively wide (26mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (14MP)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 III
Vlogging with Samsung HZ50W
32
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detect autofocus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have microphone port
more heavy than competitors (410 grams)
24
relatively wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung HZ50W
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIISamsung HZ50W
General Information
Make Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Samsung HZ50W
Other name - WB5500
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2017-08-31 2010-05-03
Body design SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Highest enhanced ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 64
RAW support
Lowest enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-676mm (26.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8-5.0
Macro focus range - 10cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 1,040k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 16s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shutter speed 8.6 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 5.60 m
Flash settings Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 410g (0.90 lbs) 426g (0.94 lbs)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 shots -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-50 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SC/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Retail pricing $650 $250