Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ50W
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63


70 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Released August 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Launched May 2010
- Other Name is WB5500

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
Below is a complete review of the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung HZ50W, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the HZ50W (14MP) is fairly close but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and HZ50W (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizing.

The E-M10 III was released 7 years later than the HZ50W and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving into a complete comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-M10 III scores against the HZ50W when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Samsung HZ50W. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Samsung HZ50W
E-M10 III | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2017 | ![]() | May 2010 | More recent by 90 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Olympus E-M10 III
HZ50W | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung HZ50W
E-M10 III | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III features outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Samsung HZ50W has proportions of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 III and Samsung HZ50W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 III vs the HZ50W.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and HZ50W is 80 and 70 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements merely by looking through technical specs. The visual here may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and HZ50W.
As you can tell, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 III will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 III should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Samsung HZ50W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Samsung HZ50W |
Other name | - | WB5500 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2017-08-31 | 2010-05-03 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 16s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 5.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 lbs) | 426g (0.94 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $650 | $250 |