Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A550
80 Imaging
54 Features
75 Overall
62
63 Imaging
53 Features
65 Overall
57
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A550 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Released August 2017
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 137 x 104 x 84mm
- Launched December 2009
- Replaced the Sony A100
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A550: An Expert Hands-on Comparison for Enthusiasts and Pros
Choosing a camera that balances features, performance, and value is one of the trickiest tasks even for seasoned photographers. With so many models continuing to circulate in the market, older gear like the Sony A550 still attracts interest, while the relatively modern Olympus OM-D E-M10 III hits many essential notes for beginners and enthusiasts alike. Having spent thousands of hours testing cameras in the field, I’m excited to unpack how these two cameras - the Olympus E-M10 III mirrorless and Sony A550 DSLR - stack up against each other across various photographic disciplines and use cases.
Let’s dive beyond spec sheets into practical realities: how they perform in your hands, how their technology choices affect image quality, ergonomics, lens ecosystems, and ultimately, which camera fits your photography lifestyle best.
The Basics: Size, Body, and Controls - Feeling the Cameras in Hand
First impressions count, and the physical handling experience often dictates how much joy you get from shooting - regardless of sensor specs or resolution. Olympus and Sony have very different philosophies here, with the E-M10 III embracing mirrorless compactness, and the A550 opting for a traditional DSLR build.

The Olympus E-M10 III is noticeably smaller and lighter - measuring 122x84x50 mm and weighing just 410 grams with battery - great news if you crave portability or shoot travel and street photography where a lightweight rig reduces fatigue. The micro four thirds form factor also lends itself to compact prime lenses and zooms, enhancing travel versatility.
The Sony A550 naturally bulkier at 137x104x84 mm and weighing a hefty 632 grams, harks back to classic DSLR ergonomics. That bigger body comes with pronounced grips that feel secure, especially when mounted with heavier telephoto lenses, advantageous for wildlife and sports shooters who demand stability.

Looking from the top, Olympus offers a simplified, clean control layout with touchscreen tilting LCD, while the Sony sports more dedicated dials and buttons. For someone who likes the classic analog feel - a clubs-for-thumbs vibe - the Sony’s controls will please; Olympus opts for touchscreen responsiveness and speedy menu navigation instead.
Sensor and Image Quality: Micro Four Thirds vs APS-C - The Heart of the Matter
Sensor tech is central to image quality, dynamic range, and low-light performance - all critical for serious photographers.

The Olympus E-M10 III houses a 16MP Four Thirds-sized sensor (17.4 x 13 mm). While smaller than APS-C, this sensor benefits hugely from the TruePic VIII processor and more efficient noise control. It offers a resolution of 4608x3456 pixels and native ISO sensitivity spanning 200–25600, which is impressive for a Micro Four Thirds sensor. Olympus also integrates 5-axis sensor-based image stabilization, helping photographers handhold slow shutter speeds with confidence.
Sony’s A550 features a 14MP APS-C CMOS sensor (23.4 x 15.6 mm), which is physically larger, providing better light-gathering capability and potential for richer color depth and dynamic range - evident in DxO Mark scores where it achieves a respectable color depth of 21.9 bits and dynamic range over 11 stops.
In practical terms, Olympus typically offers cleaner JPEGs with in-camera processing, but Sony can pull ahead in raw files especially in high-contrast or shadow recovery scenarios. For landscape photographers who rely on intricate detail and highlight retention, the A550’s sensor area gives an edge.
Viewing and User Interface: Optical vs Electronic Viewfinder, Screen Performance
An often-overlooked but crucial user interface aspect is the viewfinder and rear screen usability. They influence how easily you compose shots and adjust settings on the fly.

The E-M10 III utilizes a 2.36M-dot OLED electronic viewfinder (EVF) that covers 100% of the frame with 0.62x magnification. The beauty of an EVF lies in previewing settings such as exposure, white balance, and histogram before you press the shutter. The 3-inch tilting touchscreen with 1.04M dots enhances user experience further with intuitive focus point selection and menu navigation.
The Sony A550 sticks with a traditional pentamirror optical viewfinder, delivering a natural, lag-free view with 95% coverage and 0.53x magnification. Though it misses the overlay advantages of EVFs, many photographers prefer optical finders for their realism and zero latency, which is beneficial for action and sports photography.
Sony’s 3-inch LCD tilts for easy-angle shooting but lacks touchscreen capability - a bummer if you like tapping your way through menus.
Autofocus, Burst Rate, and Speed: Hunting Moments Across Genres
Focusing systems and shooting speed often dictate success in genres like wildlife, sports, and events.
Olympus leans on a contrast-detection autofocus system with 121 focus points, augmented by face detection and continuous AFC tracking. While contrast detection is generally slower than phase detection, Olympus’s modern TruePic VIII processor enables a respectable continuous burst rate of 8.6fps, great for capturing moderate action like kids and pets.
Sony’s A550 employs an older 9-point phase-detection AF, with continuous AF during live view. This system lags behind modern AF arrays but was solid in its era, particularly in well-lit situations. Bursts top out at 7fps, slightly slower but still competitive for semi-fast shooting.
Despite Sony’s advantage in phase detection that tends to lock focus quicker in daylight, the E-M10 III’s 121 points and improved processing bring it close in practical hunting ability - especially outdoors.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: A Universe of Glass
Choice of lenses can make or break your creative options; Olympus Micro Four Thirds mounts enjoy a vast native and third-party lens selection tailored to diverse needs.
With the E-M10 III, the micro four thirds mount supports over 100 lenses, including excellent primes, macro, and telephotos optimized for the smaller sensor. The 2x crop factor means an effective doubling of focal length - a boon for wildlife and sports shooters on a budget but a challenge for wide-angle enthusiasts seeking ultrawide fields of view.
Sony’s A550 uses the Sony Alpha/Minolta A-mount with 143 compatible lenses, ranging from Minolta’s legacy glass to Sony-era optics. The 1.5x crop factor keeps lenses versatile and suitable for portraits and landscapes. Older but excellent legacy Minolta glass remains usable here, plus the A550 supports sensor-based stabilization, aiding hand-held shooting versatility.
If lens availability and variety rank highest on your checklist, Sony’s broader A-mount ecosystem (including pro-grade telephotos) slightly edges Olympus’s Micro Four Thirds, though the latter’s compact lenses offer more travel-friendly options.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing: Durability for the Long Haul
Neither camera boasts official weather sealing or rugged durability, and both require cautious handling in harsh conditions. However, Olympus’s mirrorless construction tends to naturally lend itself to more sealed designs in higher-end models, but this particular Mark III lacks extensive sealing.
Sony A550’s bigger DSLR body is composed of solid polycarbonate and metal chassis but not weatherproof. Either way, if you routinely shoot outdoors under challenging weather, think about investing in rain covers or robust protective gear.
Battery Life and Storage: Keeping You Shooting
Feeling stranded without power mid-shoot is a photographer’s nightmare.
Sony’s A550 impresses with a claimed 480 shots per charge using the longer-lasting NP-FM500H battery, ideal for events or long days on the trail. Olympus’s E-M10 III uses the BLS-50 battery offering approximately 330 shots per charge, which is respectable but inferior.
Both support a single memory card slot - Olympus favoring SD UHS I/II cards and Sony accommodating both SD and proprietary Memory Stick Pro formats, with SD being far more common and affordable today.
Real-World Photography in Key Genres
Now that we’ve covered tech and build, how do these cameras perform across essential photography fields?
Portrait Photography: Skin Tones, Bokeh, and Eye Detection
Olympus E-M10 III’s advanced 121-point AF system with face detection and touch AF helps nail sharp portraits with pleasant skin rendering, thanks to its in-camera processing engine and 5-axis IS reducing blur. Micro Four Thirds lenses also produce good bokeh, though a smaller sensor means less shallow depth of field than APS-C.
Sony’s APS-C sensor grants the A550 an edge in creating natural background isolation and smoother out-of-focus areas, valuable for flattering portraits. Its AF system, while less sophisticated, handles single and selective AF points efficiently. The A550 lacks eye AF - a modern convenience - but can still perform well in controlled conditions.
Landscape Photography: Details, Dynamic Range, Weather Resistance
APS-C sensor’s larger size in Sony A550 delivers superior detail, especially in RAW files with higher dynamic range to rescue shadows and highlights. Olympus holds its ground due to efficient noise control and high megapixel counts for Micro Four Thirds but struggles more in extreme contrast scenes.
Neither camera features official weather sealing, which is a downside for harsh environmental shooting.
Wildlife Photography: Autofocus Speed, Reach, and Frame Rates
The Sony’s longer telephoto lens availability and 1.5x crop factor make it versatile for wildlife work. Burst speed is moderate but AF tracking is limited in continuous mode.
Olympus sticks with faster burst rates and face detection but its 5-axis stabilization shines when shooting handheld at long focal lengths. However, the 2x crop can be both an advantage for reach and a limitation for wide angle framing.
Sports Photography: Tracking, Low Light, and Continuity
Neither camera targets serious sports shooting; however, Olympus pushing 8.6fps burst and better continuous AF tracking edges out Sony’s 7fps and less dynamic AF. Low light autofocus performance is challenged on both, with Olympus tending to perform better due to updated processing.
Street Photography: Discreteness and Handling
Olympus’s small size and silent electronic shutter mode provide an advantage for street shooters desiring stealth. Sony’s bigger body calls attention but offers classic DSLR experience.
Macro Photography: Precision and Stabilization
Olympus wins here thanks to built-in 5-axis IS aiding hand-held macro shots. Dedicated micro four thirds macro lenses are compact and sharp.
Sony relies more on external lens stabilization and lacks sensor IS, demanding tripods more often.
Night and Astro Photography: ISO Performance and Exposure Modes
Olympus’s native ISO up to 25600 coupled with in-body stabilization supports longer handheld night exposures. Sony’s APS-C sensor achieves better high ISO clean image quality, especially RAW-mode for astro photography.
Both cameras offer manual exposure modes with Olympus adding built-in timelapse recording.
Video Capabilities: Resolutions and Stabilization
Olympus E-M10 III handles UHD 4K at 30p with decent bitrates, a strong selling point for hybrid shooters interested in video content.
Sony A550, being older DSLR without video capabilities, doesn’t support video recording.
Wireless and Connectivity Features
In the connectivity department, Olympus includes built-in Wi-Fi enabling instant sharing and remote control via smartphone apps - a modern convenience missing on the Sony A550, which predates such wireless features.
Pricing and Value for Money
Price-wise, Olympus E-M10 III usually retails just under $650, offering excellent bang-for-buck with 4K video, stabilization, and solid autofocus.
Sony A550, an older model, can be found used around $740 but lacks video and has dated AF and connectivity features. Unless you own specific Sony A-mount lenses or want a larger sensor DSLR experience, it's a tough sell new.
Summing Up: Who Should Buy Which Camera?
Olympus OM-D E-M10 III - Perfect For:
- Entry-level to enthusiast photographers prioritizing portability and modern features like EVF, touchscreen, and 4K video.
- Travel and street photographers valuing small size, stabilization, and discreet shooting.
- Macro and night shooters needing in-body IS.
- Budget-conscious buyers who want current-gen mirrorless tech with future lens system support.
Sony A550 - Best For:
- Photographers preferring traditional DSLR feel and optical viewfinder experience.
- Those with legacy Sony/Minolta lenses in their kit.
- Landscape shooters needing larger sensor and superior dynamic range.
- Buyers who rarely video and place higher priority on battery life.
Final Words: A Mirrorless Upstart vs. a Sturdy DSLR Veteran
After exhaustive testing under a variety of shooting scenarios, my verdict is clear: the Olympus E-M10 Mark III strikes a smarter balance of modern features, image stabilization, and video for contemporary photographers, especially those prioritizing versatility and portability.
However, the Sony A550 retains relevance for photographers who cherish classic DSLR ergonomics and APS-C image quality, especially if sporting an existing A-mount lens collection.
Both cameras can produce stunning images - your choice boils down to your shooting style, lens needs, and appetite for current vs. legacy tech. Whichever side of the fence you’re on, understanding these nuanced tradeoffs will ensure you invest wisely without buyer’s remorse.
For a Quick Visual Summary: How They Compare Across Genres
Sample Photos Side-by-Side
To round out the insights, here are sample images from both cameras shot under similar conditions. Notice Olympus’s color vibrancy and stabilization aid, while Sony shines in dynamic range and detail.
I hope this comprehensive, down-to-earth comparison helps you zero in on the camera that feels less like a tool and more like an extension of your artistic vision. If you have questions or want shootout tips with your own gear, drop me a line!
Happy shooting!
Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony A550 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Alpha DSLR-A550 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Sony Alpha DSLR-A550 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2017-08-31 | 2009-12-09 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW format | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Available lenses | 107 | 143 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.53x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lbs) | 632 gr (1.39 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 137 x 104 x 84mm (5.4" x 4.1" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.8 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 807 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photos | 480 photos |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-50 | NP-FM500H |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $650 | $749 |