Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX10 II

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II front
Portability
58
Imaging
52
Features
77
Overall
62

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX10 II Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Introduced August 2017
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M10 II
  • Successor is Olympus E-M10 IV
Sony RX10 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
  • 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
  • Released June 2015
  • Replaced the Sony RX10
  • Replacement is Sony RX10 III
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX10 II Overview

The following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sony RX10 II, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the RX10 II (20MP) is very comparable but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and RX10 II (1") boast totally different sensor dimensions.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-M10 III was manufactured 2 years after the RX10 II which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX10 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-M10 III grades versus the RX10 II with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Sony RX10 II

 E-M10 III RX10 II 
ReleasedAugust 2017June 2015Newer by 28 months
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 II over the Olympus E-M10 III

 RX10 II E-M10 III 
Display resolution1229k1040kSharper display (+189k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Sony RX10 II

 E-M10 III RX10 II 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Display size3"3"Same display sizing
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX10 II Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III enjoys external measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 II has proportions of 129mm x 88mm x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") and a weight of 813 grams (1.79 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M10 III versus Sony RX10 II in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 III compared to the RX10 II.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX10 II size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and RX10 II is 80 and 58 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX10 II top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX10 II Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions just by checking out technical specs. The image below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and RX10 II.

As you have seen, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III because of its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Sony RX10 II will show greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 III will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX10 II sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX10 II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography details
Sony RX10 II Portrait photography details
73
manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focus
saves RAW files
71
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (20MP)
sensor size is good (1")
features face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Street photography with Sony RX10 II
77
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
features focus by touch
above average ISO range (25,600)
heavier than competition in class (410g)
72
tilting screen
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is good (1")
saves RAW files
weather proof
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography information
Sony RX10 II Sports photography information
69
quiet shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
has no phase detect auto focus
68
silent shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (1")
features tracking focus
weather proof
lacks phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Travel photography camera
Sony RX10 II as a Travel photography camera
67
features focus by touch
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
heavier than competition in class (410 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
56
weather proof
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (24mm)
no Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Landscape photography with Sony RX10 II
80
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
62
has manual focus
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (1")
saves RAW files
weather proof
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
no Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging factors
Sony RX10 II Vlogging factors
32
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detect focus
great video quality (3840 x 2160 pixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have mic socket
heavier than competition in class (410g)
31
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect autofocus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
does have microphone socket
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 III vs Sony RX10 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Sony RX10 II
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Large Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2017-08-31 2015-06-10
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 25600 12800
Maximum boosted ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 200 125
RAW data
Lowest boosted ISO 100 64
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 121 25
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-200mm (8.3x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 2.7
Screen
Screen type Tilting Tilting
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,040 thousand dots 1,229 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots 2,359 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/16000 seconds 1/32000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 8.6fps 14.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 10.20 m
Flash modes Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 3840x2160
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 410 gr (0.90 lb) 813 gr (1.79 lb)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 70
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.0
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 531
Other
Battery life 330 shots 400 shots
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-50 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots One One
Launch pricing $650 $998