Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-4
Portability
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
Portability
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
Olympus E-M10
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Released March 2014
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 II
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced April 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-3
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-5
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Following is a extended overview of the Olympus E-M10 and Olympus TG-4, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both are created by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-M10 (16MP) and the TG-4 (16MP) is relatively similar but the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and TG-4 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M10 was launched 13 months before the TG-4 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-M10 matches up versus the TG-4 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 & Olympus Tough TG-4. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 Gallery & Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Olympus TG-4
| E-M10 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+577k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus E-M10
| TG-4 | E-M10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2015 |  | March 2014 | More modern by 13 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Olympus TG-4
| E-M10 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 enjoys outer dimensions of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) while the Olympus TG-4 has measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 and Olympus TG-4 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 and the TG-4.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 and TG-4 is 82 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading specs. The picture underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 and TG-4.
All in all, the 2 cameras feature the identical megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizes. The E-M10 provides the bigger sensor which will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult. The more aged E-M10 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M10 Portrait photography factors
Olympus TG-4 Portrait photography factors
focusing manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
features face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Street photography with Olympus E-M10
Street photography with Olympus TG-4
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
supports touch to focus
very good ISO range (25,600)
more heavy than average (396 grams)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
environment proofing
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
heavier than competitors in class (247 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Olympus E-M10 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-4 as a Sports photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
lack of phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
environment proofing
good battery power (380 shots)
slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M10 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-4 as a Travel photography camera
supports touch to focus
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
more heavy than average (396 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
good battery power (380 per charge)
environment proofing
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
heavier than competitors in class (247 grams)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M10 Landscape photography details
Olympus TG-4 Landscape photography details
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
has manual focus
really wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
exports RAW files
environment proofing
good battery power (380 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 Vlogging information
Olympus TG-4 Vlogging information
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detection autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
doesn't have external microphone port
more heavy than average (396g)
really wide (25mm)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
does not have external mic socket
heavier than competitors in class (247g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Released | 2014-03-18 | 2015-04-13 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 81 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO100) | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual（1/1（FULL）～1/64） | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 396g (0.87 pounds) | 247g (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 884 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 images | 380 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-5 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $600 | $379 |