Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-110
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32c25/32c25c6ef6b46a16d6fe37b7519c064ff3aff376" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 front Olympus OM-D E-M10 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28610/28610d92a1bc9db50c39d8fc3686aeec0604eb40" alt="Olympus VG-110 front Olympus VG-110 front"
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Introduced March 2014
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Launched February 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
The following is a in depth comparison of the Olympus E-M10 and Olympus VG-110, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the E-M10 (16MP) and VG-110 (12MP) and the E-M10 (Four Thirds) and VG-110 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M10 was manufactured 3 years after the VG-110 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the E-M10 matches up against the VG-110 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 and Olympus VG-110. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 Gallery and Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Olympus VG-110
E-M10 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2014 | ![]() | February 2011 | Newer by 38 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus E-M10
VG-110 | E-M10 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 and Olympus VG-110
E-M10 | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 has outer measurements of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") and a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-110 has sizing of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 and Olympus VG-110 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M10 and the VG-110.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a99b2/a99b21c21c3261483a4735cbed3da61677c202a5" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-110 size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-110 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 and VG-110 is 82 and 97 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddc37/ddc37db3f3a1fa6785bdaa37c8106c6c70340237" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-110 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-110 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions just by looking through specs. The picture underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 and VG-110.
All in all, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 will render more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 will have an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e2c8/2e2c8fdad940b75a19dfe3386d102e9261ea96c9" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-110 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-110 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f287/9f2875bb9e67e84ade082fa94337ee071f5ef579" alt="Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Olympus VG-110 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | Olympus VG-110 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2014-03-18 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO100) | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 396g (0.87 lbs) | 105g (0.23 lbs) |
Dimensions | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 884 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 170 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $600 | $150 |