Clicky

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SH-50

Portability
54
Imaging
61
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1X front
 
Olympus SH-50 front
Portability
88
Imaging
40
Features
48
Overall
43

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SH-50 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1X
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
  • Revealed January 2019
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1 II
Olympus SH-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
  • Announced January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SH-50 Overview

Here is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-M1X and Olympus SH-50, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are created by Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and SH-50 (16MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and SH-50 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M1X was launched 6 years later than the SH-50 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-50 being a Compact camera.

Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-M1X scores versus the SH-50 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Olympus SH-50

 E-M1X SH-50 
AnnouncedJanuary 2019January 2013Fresher by 74 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k460kCrisper screen (+577k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Olympus E-M1X

 SH-50 E-M1X 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Olympus SH-50

 E-M1X SH-50 
Manual focus More precise focusing
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SH-50 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1X provides exterior measurements of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) while the Olympus SH-50 has proportions of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M1X and Olympus SH-50 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-M1X against the SH-50.

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SH-50 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1X and SH-50 is 54 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SH-50 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SH-50 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing simply by looking at specs. The graphic here might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1X and SH-50.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1X because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1X will give you more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The fresher E-M1X is going to have an edge in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SH-50 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1X as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus SH-50 as a Portrait photography camera
76
you can focus manually
MP count good (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focusing
exports RAW formats
44
focusing manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides face detection focusing
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1X Street photography details
Olympus SH-50 Street photography details
67
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
boasts touch to focus
environment proof
above average high ISO (25,600)
heavier than competition (997g)
64
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has focus by touch
lighter than competition in class (269g)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1X
Sports photography with Olympus SH-50
80
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
quiet mode (1/32,000s)
high frames per second (60.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
environment proof
good battery power (870 CIPA)
sensor has phase detect AF
48
amazing zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1X
Travel photography with Olympus SH-50
68
good battery power (870 per charge)
environment proof
has bluetooth
boasts touch to focus
MP count good (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
heavier than competition (997 grams)
69
lighter than competition in class (269 grams)
has focus by touch
good megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
great reach (600mm)
does not have Timelapse function
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1X
Landscape photography with Olympus SH-50
79
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
environment proof
good battery power (870 per charge)
two card slots
49
focusing manually
relatively wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1X Vlogging features
Olympus SH-50 Vlogging features
68
selfie friendly screen
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection focusing
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 pixels)
includes external mic socket
heavier than competition (997g)
34
relatively wide (25mm)
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition in class (269 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
does not have external microphone support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M1X vs Olympus SH-50 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1X and Olympus SH-50
 Olympus OM-D E-M1XOlympus SH-50
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1X Olympus SH-50
Category Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2019-01-24 2013-01-08
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Dual TruePic VIII TruePic VI
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 200 125
RAW pictures
Min boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.0-6.9
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 1,037k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 15 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0fps 12.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 4.00 m
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Built-in None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 997g (2.20 lbs) 269g (0.59 lbs)
Dimensions 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 870 pictures -
Form of battery Built-in -
Battery ID - SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter)
Time lapse recording
Storage type - SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 2 Single
Price at launch $2,999 $300