Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX700
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
94 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Announced January 2019
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 176g - 104 x 56 x 25mm
- Released July 2010
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX700 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX700, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1X (20MP) and FX700 (14MP) and the E-M1X (Four Thirds) and FX700 (1/2.3") feature different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M1X was launched 8 years after the FX700 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX700 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the E-M1X grades vs the FX700 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX700 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1X and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1X Gallery and Panasonic FX700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Panasonic FX700
E-M1X | FX700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2019 | July 2010 | More modern by 104 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX700 over the Olympus E-M1X
FX700 | E-M1X |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1X and Panasonic FX700
E-M1X | FX700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX700 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1X features external dimensions of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs) and the Panasonic FX700 has sizing of 104mm x 56mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX700 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-M1X versus the FX700.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1X and FX700 is 54 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX700 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes simply by checking specifications. The pic underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1X and FX700.
To sum up, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M1X because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1X will resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The younger E-M1X should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1X vs Panasonic FX700 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2019-01-24 | 2010-07-21 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Dual TruePic VIII | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.40 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 997g (2.20 lb) | 176g (0.39 lb) |
Dimensions | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") | 104 x 56 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 870 images | - |
Battery style | Built-in | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | 1 |
Launch price | $2,999 | $399 |