Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Announced February 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M5
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- New Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
The following is a detailed review of the Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are sold by Olympus. The resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is pretty comparable but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M5 II was released 5 years after the SP-800 UZ which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-M5 II matches up against the SP-800 UZ in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Olympus SP-800 UZ. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-M5 II | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | February 2010 | Newer by 61 months | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus E-M5 II
SP-800 UZ | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-M5 II | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 II provides physical dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") having a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Olympus SP-800 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") and a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M5 II vs the SP-800 UZ.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 II and SP-800 UZ is 80 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out specs. The picture below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 II and SP-800 UZ.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 II featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M5 II will show extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 II provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2015-02-06 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 1000 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 12s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 469g (1.03 lb) | 455g (1.00 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $699 | $270 |