Clicky

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ

Portability
80
Imaging
54
Features
84
Overall
66
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front
 
Olympus SP-800 UZ front
Portability
69
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
  • Announced February 2015
  • Older Model is Olympus E-M5
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-M5 III
Olympus SP-800 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 1000)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
  • Launched February 2010
  • New Model is Olympus SP-810 UZ
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview

The following is a detailed review of the Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are sold by Olympus. The resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is pretty comparable but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-M5 II was released 5 years after the SP-800 UZ which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.

Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-M5 II matches up against the SP-800 UZ in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus SP-800 UZ

 E-M5 II SP-800 UZ 
LaunchedFebruary 2015February 2010Newer by 61 months
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k230kSharper screen (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus E-M5 II

 SP-800 UZ E-M5 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus SP-800 UZ

 E-M5 II SP-800 UZ 
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurements

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 II provides physical dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") having a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Olympus SP-800 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") and a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M5 II vs the SP-800 UZ.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 II and SP-800 UZ is 80 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be hard to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out specs. The picture below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 II and SP-800 UZ.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 II featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M5 II will show extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 II provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus SP-800 UZ as a Portrait photography camera
72
manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detect focusing
supports RAW files
28
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Street photography details
Olympus SP-800 UZ Street photography details
82
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
comes with focus by touch
weather proof
above average ISO range (25,600)
46
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Sports photography details
Olympus SP-800 UZ Sports photography details
65
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
weather proof
not so great battery pack (310 CIPA)
lack of phase detect AF
47
great zoom range (28-840mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Travel photography advice
Olympus SP-800 UZ Travel photography advice
74
weather proof
comes with focus by touch
megapixel count good (16MP)
display is selfie friendly
not so great battery pack (310 per charge)
61
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
great reach (840mm)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Landscape photography information
Olympus SP-800 UZ Landscape photography information
74
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
weather proof
not so great battery pack (310 shots)
41
really wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II as a Vlogging camera
Olympus SP-800 UZ as a Vlogging camera
82
display is selfie friendly
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does have microphone socket
24
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus SP-800 UZ
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IIOlympus SP-800 UZ
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Olympus SP-800 UZ
Type Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2015-02-06 2010-02-02
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VII TruePic III
Sensor type MOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Max boosted ISO - 1000
Min native ISO 200 64
RAW files
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 81 143
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-840mm (30.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8-5.6
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 12s
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shooting speed 10.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.10 m
Flash settings Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 469g (1.03 lb) 455g (1.00 lb)
Physical dimensions 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 896 not tested
Other
Battery life 310 pictures -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLN-1 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $699 $270