Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
Portability
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Released February 2015
- Replaced the Olympus E-M5
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M5 III
Olympus TG-850 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both are created by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the TG-850 iHS (16MP) is fairly well matched but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M5 II was introduced 13 months after the TG-850 iHS making them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-M5 II scores against the TG-850 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
| E-M5 II | TG-850 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2015 |  | January 2014 | Newer by 13 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 1037k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+577k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus E-M5 II
| TG-850 iHS | E-M5 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus TG-850 iHS
| E-M5 II | TG-850 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 II has got exterior dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") and a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Olympus TG-850 iHS has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M5 II against the TG-850 iHS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 II and TG-850 iHS is 80 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions just by checking specifications. The picture below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 II and TG-850 iHS.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have the same megapixel count but not the same sensor dimensions. The E-M5 II provides the larger sensor which will make getting shallow depth of field easier. The fresher E-M5 II is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus E-M5 II
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-850 iHS
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
megapixel count decent (16MP)
supports face detection focus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-850 iHS as a Street photography camera
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
features touch to focus
environment proof
good high ISO (25,600)
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
environment sealing
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II Sports photography highlights
Olympus TG-850 iHS Sports photography highlights
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
silent shooting (1/16,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
environment proof
terrible battery (310 CIPA)
no phase detect autofocus
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
environment sealing
better than average battery power (330 CIPA)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-850 iHS as a Travel photography camera
environment proof
features touch to focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
selfie friendly display
terrible battery (310 CIPA)
better than average battery power (330 per charge)
environment sealing
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (21mm)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II Landscape photography advice
Olympus TG-850 iHS Landscape photography advice
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
environment proof
terrible battery (310 shots)
reasonably wide (21mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
environment sealing
better than average battery power (330 CIPA)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II Vlogging advice
Olympus TG-850 iHS Vlogging advice
selfie friendly display
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
comes with mic jack
reasonably wide (21mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
| Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Released | 2015-02-06 | 2014-01-29 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4616 x 3464 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 81 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/2 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Yes |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 469g (1.03 lbs) | 218g (0.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 896 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 310 photos | 330 photos |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLN-1 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $699 | $250 |