Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87f98/87f9860bdd2f90e1ac1160944f3da7fb05966ce6" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90636/906367f78182e973de499b537fdc76fa3fafdc16" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Released February 2015
- Replaced the Olympus E-M5
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both are created by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the TG-850 iHS (16MP) is fairly well matched but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M5 II was introduced 13 months after the TG-850 iHS making them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-M5 II scores against the TG-850 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-M5 II | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | ![]() | January 2014 | Newer by 13 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus E-M5 II
TG-850 iHS | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-M5 II | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display size |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 II has got exterior dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") and a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Olympus TG-850 iHS has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M5 II against the TG-850 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb2c8/bb2c83d6d81f75cafd3ea30e2eb2bced0cdfed3e" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 II and TG-850 iHS is 80 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42fc9/42fc90f6f1787db8d9b94acbd2ce44c38a61ef84" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions just by checking specifications. The picture below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 II and TG-850 iHS.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have the same megapixel count but not the same sensor dimensions. The E-M5 II provides the larger sensor which will make getting shallow depth of field easier. The fresher E-M5 II is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4826/f4826ace57a0fd2e847bcb1333282063ce98b4a6" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27081/27081b7cbcd3f0f5628c929884085b4ee89256c1" alt="Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2015-02-06 | 2014-01-29 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4616 x 3464 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Yes |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 469g (1.03 lbs) | 218g (0.48 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photos | 330 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $699 | $250 |