Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus VR-320
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Launched February 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M5
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-M5 II versus Olympus VR-320, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are designed by Olympus. The resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very close but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and VR-320 (1/2.3") use different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M5 II was revealed 3 years later than the VR-320 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-M5 II matches up vs the VR-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Olympus VR-320
E-M5 II | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | July 2011 | Fresher by 44 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus E-M5 II
VR-320 | E-M5 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Olympus VR-320
E-M5 II | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera, you should think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 II comes with physical dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") and a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M5 II versus Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M5 II compared to the VR-320.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 II and VR-320 is 80 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizing merely by viewing specifications. The graphic below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 II and VR-320.
To sum up, both of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 II having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M5 II will result in extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos much more aggressively. The younger E-M5 II should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Olympus VR-320 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2015-02-06 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 469 grams (1.03 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $699 | $179 |