Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A380
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65


68 Imaging
53 Features
54 Overall
53
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A380 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Released February 2015
- Old Model is Olympus E-M5
- Successor is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)

Olympus OM-D E-M5 II vs Sony Alpha DSLR-A380: A Hands-On Comparative Review for Photography Enthusiasts
When considering a new camera purchase amid the sea of options, it’s crucial to analyze not just specs on paper but real-world performance and usability. Today, I’m putting two cameras from slightly different eras and categories head to head - the Olympus OM-D E-M5 II, an advanced Micro Four Thirds mirrorless from 2015, and the entry-level DSLR powerhouse from 2009, the Sony Alpha DSLR-A380.
Both appeal to enthusiasts but with diverging approaches: Olympus leans compact, highly stabilized, and versatile, while Sony focuses on optical clarity and classic DSLR handling. Drawing on my extensive testing experience, I’ll walk you through technical details, how they fare across key photography genres, and who ultimately should consider each. Along the way, you’ll see sample images, performance charts, and nuanced insights that only come from hands-on, side-by-side testing.
Let’s dig in.
First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling Dynamics
Before we zoom into specs, size and handling drastically shape your shooting experience. The Olympus E-M5 II sports a Micro Four Thirds, SLR-style mirrorless body, while the Sony A380 is a bulkier traditional APS-C DSLR with a pentamirror viewfinder.
Check out the physical size comparison:
The Olympus is noticeably more compact and lighter at 469g versus Sony’s 519g - not a huge gap, but Olympus’s slimmer depth (45 mm versus 71 mm) makes it easier to pocket or travel with. The E-M5 II carries that familiar Mercedes steering-wheel dial layout, ideal for users who want quick button access without fumbling through menus.
View the control layout from above:
The Sony’s control scheme is more traditional DSLR - greater heft, more pronounced handgrip, and a smaller, non-touch tilting screen. The Olympus, by contrast, features a fully articulated touchscreen that's a definite plus for vloggers and macro shooters alike.
Ergonomically, if you often shoot handheld for long stretches or travel light, the Olympus holds an edge here. Conversely, traditionalists who value optical viewfinder clarity and a robust DSLR grip might lean Sony.
Sensor Tech and Image Quality: The Heart of It
Next, sensor specs and resulting image quality - always paramount. Interestingly, the Olympus employs a Four Thirds 16MP MOS sensor (17.3x13mm), whereas the Sony has a larger APS-C 14MP CCD sensor (23.6x15.8mm). Here’s the sensor size comparison:
The Sony’s larger sensor physically captures more light, a critical factor especially in lower light or when aiming for shallower depth of field. However, the Olympus uses a newer MOS chip with improved noise handling and higher max ISO (25600 vs 3200 native for the Sony).
In real-world shooting, Olympus images exhibited cleaner high-ISO performance and better dynamic range - measured at 12.4 EV vs Sony’s 11.8 EV per DxOMark results. This translates into crisper shadows and highlight detail in landscape or event photography with challenging lighting.
Color depth (23.0-bit for Olympus vs 22.6-bit Sony) and resolution are comparable; Olympus produces 4608x3456 pixel images against Sony’s 4592x3056. The Olympus’s anti-alias filter, meanwhile, smooths some fine detail but reduces moiré in complex textures, useful for architectural shots.
Sample image gallery to get a tangible feel:
Here, you can see Olympus's punchier colors and cleaner noise at ISO 1600, while Sony offers a slightly warmer tone and more natural bokeh thanks to APS-C sensor characteristics.
Autofocus Systems: Speed, Precision, and Tracking
Autofocus defines your ability to capture that decisive moment, especially in wildlife, sports, or street photography. Olympus boasts an 81-point contrast-detection AF system with face detection and continuous AF, but no phase detection pixels. Sony relies on a classic 9-point phase-detection AF with selective area modes but no continuous tracking AF, and no face detection.
In hands-on testing, Olympus’s AF was snappier and more accurate in Live View thanks to upgraded TruePic VII processing, though slower in dark or low-contrast scenes. Its face detection worked reliably, a boon for portrait and street shooters. Sony’s phase-detection offered quicker initial focus lock but occasionally hunted on Live View or high ISO settings.
Burst rate-wise, Olympus delivers 10 FPS mechanical shutter continuous shooting, noticeably faster than Sony’s 3 FPS. For fast action or bird-in-flight, Olympus's continuous AF and buffer make it the better tool.
Build Quality and Environmental Resilience
Olympus’s weather-sealed magnesium alloy body resists dust and splash, terrific for landscape or outdoor journalistic use. Sony lacks sealing and feels more plastic-heavy, which is expected given its earlier entry-level DSLR status.
Neither are shockproof or freezeproof, but Olympus’s sealing gives it a serious advantage in rugged conditions.
Ergonomics and User Interface: Touch and Feel
Olympus’s fully articulated 3" 1.03M-dot touchscreen versus Sony’s 2.7" 230k-dot tilting display clearly tips in favor of Olympus for compositional flexibility and intuitive menu navigation.
The touchscreen makes quick AF point selection accessible on Olympus, a feature notably missing on Sony’s less responsive interface. For video shooters and macro photographers, the flip-out LCD is invaluable.
Olympus’s electronic viewfinder boasts a sharp, color-rich 2.36M-dot panel, covering 100% frame while Sony has an optical pentamirror with 95% coverage and lower magnification (0.49x vs 0.74x). The EVF advantage means accurate exposure preview, which I found a massive workflow booster.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility
Sony Alpha A380 uses the Sony/Minolta A-mount, which still has a decent catalog of glass including many affordable third-party options. Olympic’s Micro Four Thirds lens ecosystem is larger and more modern, with 107 native lenses offering compact primes, macro, zooms, and exotic specialty optics.
The Olympus mount's 2.1x crop factor versus Sony’s 1.5x means focal length equivalence differs - portrait shooters wanting shallow depth of field need to compensate by choosing brighter lenses on Olympus.
Personally, I value Olympus’s lens diversity for travel and macro, while Sony users benefit from slightly longer reach and traditional DSLR optics.
Battery Life and Storage
Sony's battery life is better on paper, rated for 500 shots versus Olympus’s 310. That extra endurance supports longer event shoots without carrying spares, though mirrorless advantages (like silent mode) balance usage.
Both have one memory card slot, but Sony uniquely supports Memory Stick Pro Duo alongside SD/SDHC - uncommon nowadays but worth noting for users with legacy media.
Connectivity and Video Features
Olympus includes built-in Wi-Fi for easy remote control and photo transfer, lacking on Sony. Both provide microphone ports, but only Olympus supports 1080p video at 60 fps, helpful for smooth slow motion or vlogging.
Sony offers no video recording capabilities - being a DSLR finalized just before video integration became standard.
Olympus’s in-camera 5-axis image stabilization stands out here, delivering noticeably sharper video and stabilized macro shots compared to Sony’s basic sensor-based shake reduction.
Performance by Photography Genre
To put things into actionable perspective, let’s break down strengths by genre - with support of detailed photographic scoring:
- Portraits: Olympus shines with superior face detection, bokeh control through lens choices, and fine skin tone rendering. Sony’s optical viewfinder and APS-C sensor give more natural depth but slower AF makes Olympus friendlier for spontaneous portraiture.
- Landscapes: EVF preview and articulation help Olympus, dynamic range slightly edges it; weather sealing also a factor. Sony’s larger sensor gets a nod for resolution, but frame coverage and live histogram perks favor Olympus.
- Wildlife and Sports: Olympus’s faster burst, better continuous AF, and light weight offer practical benefits. Sony’s 3 FPS limits fast action capture, and no AF tracking is a shortfall.
- Street Photography: Olympus’s compact size, silent shutter, and articulating screen create a stealthier rig than bulkier Sony, who also misses silent shooting entirely.
- Macro: Olympus takes the crown - stabilization, touchscreen focusing, and lens availability specifically for close focus.
- Night and Astrophotography: Clean ISO handling and long exposure bracketing in Olympus deliver superior results.
- Video: Olympus is the clear winner, with full HD recording, mic input, and 5-axis stabilization.
- Travel: Size, weight, battery, and versatility favor Olympus for travelers who shift between genres.
- Professional Use: Sony’s robust build and classic DSLR feel appeal to some, but Olympus’s features and lens adaptability make it a true pro contender at high ISO and challenging light.
Comparing Overall Performance and Value
Based on DxOMark overall camera scores, the Olympus earns a higher mark of 73 compared to Sony’s 67.
Given Olympus’s 2015 launch against Sony’s 2009 model, technology evolution matters, but Olympus deserves credit for squeezing modern features into a compact package.
In practice, Olympus sits at a competitive price point (~$700) that outshines Sony’s approximate $900 street value, especially when factoring advanced features like sensor stabilization and touchscreen.
Summing Up: Which One Fits Your Needs?
If you want an all-around, travel-friendly, video-capable camera with modern AF and stabilization, Olympus OM-D E-M5 II is a clear recommendation. It suits enthusiasts who juggle genres - from portraits, landscapes, macro, to low-light video - with ease and grace.
On the flip side, Sony A380 may appeal if you’re aiming for an affordable DSLR experience with optical viewfinder simplicity, longer battery life, and a solid lens mount, and don’t mind lacking video or newer AF tech.
Here’s a quick decision guide:
- Choose Olympus if: You value image stabilization, compact size, sharp EVF, fast AF, video, and weather resistance. Ideal for street, travel, macro, and video creators.
- Choose Sony if: You prefer DSLR ergonomics, optical viewfinder, and mostly shoot still photography in controlled environments.
Final Thoughts
After testing both extensively, I’m impressed by how much Olympus E-M5 II delivers technologically despite its age, outperforming Sony A380 in many practical shooting scenarios. Sony’s A380 remains a rock-solid camera with classic DSLR charm, but Olympus feels like a more adaptable and future-proof choice for most enthusiasts today.
You’ll find both capable of excellent imagery, but your workflow, genres, and handling preferences will sway the final pick. I encourage you to handle both firsthand if possible, choosing the one whose feel and interface invite you to grab and create more.
Happy shooting, wherever your photography journey takes you.
For detailed hands-on video reviews demonstrating autofocus speed, sample image comparisons, and more, check my YouTube channel.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony A380 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A380 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A380 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2015-02-06 | 2009-08-24 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Bionz |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Total lenses | 107 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 469g (1.03 lb) | 519g (1.14 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 128 x 97 x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | 67 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | 11.8 |
DXO Low light score | 896 | 614 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photos | 500 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $699 | $899 |