Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX200V
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Released February 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M5
- Later Model is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched January 2012
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX200V Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus E-M5 II versus Sony TX200V, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the TX200V (18MP) is very similar but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and TX200V (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M5 II was manufactured 3 years after the TX200V which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-M5 II scores vs the TX200V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Sony TX200V
E-M5 II | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | January 2012 | More modern by 37 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus E-M5 II
TX200V | E-M5 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.3" | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 1037k | Crisper display (+193k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Sony TX200V
E-M5 II | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 II enjoys external measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") having a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) and the Sony TX200V has sizing of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M5 II versus Sony TX200V in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M5 II against the TX200V.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 II and TX200V is 80 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reviewing technical specs. The image underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 II and TX200V.
As you have seen, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 II featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Sony TX200V will deliver extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The younger E-M5 II should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2015-02-06 | 2012-01-30 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | BIONZ |
Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 18MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3.3" |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1600s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 469 gr (1.03 lbs) | 129 gr (0.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 896 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | 220 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $699 | $500 |