Clicky

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX200V

Portability
80
Imaging
53
Features
84
Overall
65
Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V front
Portability
96
Imaging
42
Features
48
Overall
44

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX200V Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
  • Released February 2015
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M5
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M5 III
Sony TX200V
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
  • Launched January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX200V Overview

On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus E-M5 II versus Sony TX200V, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the TX200V (18MP) is very similar but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and TX200V (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M5 II was manufactured 3 years after the TX200V which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting into a full comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-M5 II scores vs the TX200V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Sony TX200V

 E-M5 II TX200V 
LaunchedFebruary 2015January 2012More modern by 37 months
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus E-M5 II

 TX200V E-M5 II 
Display dimensions3.3"3"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1230k1037kCrisper display (+193k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Sony TX200V

 E-M5 II TX200V 
Touch display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 II enjoys external measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") having a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) and the Sony TX200V has sizing of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M5 II versus Sony TX200V in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M5 II against the TX200V.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX200V size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 II and TX200V is 80 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX200V top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reviewing technical specs. The image underneath will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 II and TX200V.

As you have seen, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 II featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Sony TX200V will deliver extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The younger E-M5 II should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX200V sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Portrait photography features
Sony TX200V Portrait photography features
71
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focus
supports RAW formats
36
good resolution (18MP)
features face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Street photography advice
Sony TX200V Street photography advice
82
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
boasts focus via touch
weather proof
great high ISO (25,600)
68
has image stabilization (Optical)
has focus via touch
weather proofing
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Sports photography features
Sony TX200V Sports photography features
65
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
weather proof
terrible battery pack (310 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
49
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (18MP)
features tracking focus
weather proofing
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M5 II
Travel photography with Sony TX200V
74
weather proof
boasts focus via touch
megapixel count good (16MP)
display is selfie friendly
terrible battery pack (310 shots)
71
weather proofing
has focus via touch
good resolution (18MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Landscape photography advice
Sony TX200V Landscape photography advice
74
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
great high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW formats
weather proof
terrible battery pack (310 CIPA)
47
quite wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3.3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (18 megapixels)
weather proofing
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 II Vlogging highlights
Sony TX200V Vlogging highlights
82
display is selfie friendly
touch screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
includes external mic support
35
quite wide (28mm)
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M5 II vs Sony TX200V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 II and Sony TX200V
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IISony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V
Type Advanced Mirrorless Ultracompact
Released 2015-02-06 2012-01-30
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VII BIONZ
Sensor type MOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 18MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4896 x 3672
Maximum native ISO 25600 12800
Lowest native ISO 200 64
RAW data
Lowest enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 81 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-4.8
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3.3"
Resolution of display 1,037 thousand dot 1,230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech - 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 2s
Max shutter speed 1/8000s 1/1600s
Max quiet shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shutter speed 10.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.10 m
Flash settings Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 469 gr (1.03 lbs) 129 gr (0.28 lbs)
Physical dimensions 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 896 not tested
Other
Battery life 310 pictures 220 pictures
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLN-1 NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $699 $500