Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VG-160
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Revealed October 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Newer Model is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus VG-160, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both produced by Olympus. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and VG-160 (14MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and VG-160 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M5 III was unveiled 7 years later than the VG-160 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-M5 III scores versus the VG-160 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III and Olympus VG-160. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Olympus VG-160
E-M5 III | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2019 | January 2012 | Fresher by 95 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus E-M5 III
VG-160 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus VG-160
E-M5 III | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M5 III comes with physical dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus VG-160 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M5 III against the VG-160.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 III and VG-160 is 80 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing merely by looking through technical specs. The photograph here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 III and VG-160.
As you have seen, both cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 III using its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 III will result in extra detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more recent E-M5 III is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus VG-160 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus VG-160 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2019-10-17 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 7cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 414 gr (0.91 lb) | 125 gr (0.28 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | 165 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $1,199 | $90 |