Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Launched October 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Renewed by OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus E-M5 III versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are produced by Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") offer different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M5 III was unveiled 6 years later than the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-M5 III scores versus the XZ-2 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-M5 III | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2019 | December 2012 | More recent by 84 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Clearer screen (+120k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M5 III
XZ-2 iHS | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-M5 III | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 III comes with outside measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M5 III versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M5 III and the XZ-2 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 III and XZ-2 iHS is 80 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements purely by going over specifications. The graphic underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M5 III and XZ-2 iHS.
Plainly, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 III with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M5 III will offer you more detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 III provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2019-10-17 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 414g (0.91 lb) | 346g (0.76 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 shots | 340 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $1,199 | $450 |