Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ35W
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Introduced October 2019
- Replaced the Olympus E-M5 II
- Replacement is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Alternate Name is WB650
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ35W, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M5 III was unveiled 9 years later than the HZ35W and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-M5 III matches up against the HZ35W when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III and Samsung HZ35W. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Samsung HZ35W
E-M5 III | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2019 | June 2010 | More recent by 114 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 614k | Crisper display (+426k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-M5 III
HZ35W | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Samsung HZ35W
E-M5 III | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 III features exterior dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ35W in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M5 III compared to the HZ35W.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and HZ35W is 80 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing specifications. The graphic below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 III and HZ35W.
To sum up, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 III having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M5 III will produce more detail having an extra 8MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 III is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Samsung HZ35W |
Alternate name | - | WB650 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2019-10-17 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 16s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414 grams (0.91 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $1,199 | $300 |