Clicky

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ35W

Portability
80
Imaging
62
Features
88
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front
 
Samsung HZ35W front
Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
42
Overall
37

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
  • Introduced October 2019
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M5 II
  • Replacement is OM System OM-5
Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Revealed June 2010
  • Alternate Name is WB650
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ35W Overview

Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ35W, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M5 III was unveiled 9 years later than the HZ35W and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.

Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-M5 III matches up against the HZ35W when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Samsung HZ35W

 E-M5 III HZ35W 
RevealedOctober 2019June 2010More recent by 114 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1040k614kCrisper display (+426k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-M5 III

 HZ35W E-M5 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Samsung HZ35W

 E-M5 III HZ35W 
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Display size3"3"Same display measurements

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison

If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 III features exterior dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ35W in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M5 III compared to the HZ35W.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and HZ35W is 80 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's difficult to see the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing specifications. The graphic below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 III and HZ35W.

To sum up, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 III having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M5 III will produce more detail having an extra 8MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 III is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Portrait photography camera
77
focusing manually
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
34
you can focus manually
features face detection focusing
cannot use external flash
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III as a Street photography camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Street photography camera
83
screen articulates
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
offers focus via touch
weather proofing
good high ISO (25,600)
60
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors (245 grams)
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Sports photography info
Samsung HZ35W Sports photography info
76
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent mode (1/32,000 seconds)
max frames per second high (30.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
weather proofing
sensor has phase detect autofocus
bad battery life (310 shots)
42
excellent zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features tracking autofocus
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Travel photography highlights
Samsung HZ35W Travel photography highlights
77
weather proofing
connects via bluetooth
offers focus via touch
decent megapixels (20MP)
screen is selfie friendly
bad battery life (310 per charge)
63
lighter than competitors (245 grams)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
great zoom (360mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low resolution sensor (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Landscape photography info
Samsung HZ35W Landscape photography info
77
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
weather proofing
bad battery life (310 CIPA)
43
you can focus manually
rather wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Vlogging factors
Samsung HZ35W Vlogging factors
84
screen is selfie friendly
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection autofocus
video res high (4096 x 2160 resolution)
includes external microphone jack
31
rather wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focusing
lighter than competitors (245 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 III and Samsung HZ35W
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IIISamsung HZ35W
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus OM-D E-M5 III Samsung HZ35W
Alternate name - WB650
Category Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2019-10-17 2010-06-16
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type MOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW format
Min enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-360mm (15.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.2-5.8
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,040k dot 614k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 16s
Max shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Max silent shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shutter speed 30.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 5.00 m
Flash settings Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 414 grams (0.91 lb) 245 grams (0.54 lb)
Physical dimensions 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 310 photos -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model BLN-1 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $1,199 $300