Clicky

Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-330

Portability
81
Imaging
52
Features
70
Overall
59
Olympus OM-D E-M5 front
 
Olympus VR-330 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37

Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs

Olympus E-M5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
  • Revealed April 2012
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M5 II
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed February 2011
  • Replaced the Olympus VR-320
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview

Here, we are comparing the Olympus E-M5 versus Olympus VR-330, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are built by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-M5 (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is very comparable but the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and VR-330 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M5 was unveiled 15 months after the VR-330 making them a generation away from each other. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-M5 matches up against the VR-330 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Olympus VR-330

 E-M5 VR-330 
RevealedApril 2012February 2011Newer by 15 months
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution610k460kCrisper display (+150k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus E-M5

 VR-330 E-M5 

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Olympus VR-330

 E-M5 VR-330 
Display size3"3"Same display measurement
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 has got outer measurements of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M5 versus Olympus VR-330 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M5 vs the VR-330.

Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 and VR-330 is 81 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specifications. The image underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 and VR-330.

Plainly, both of those cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M5 will provide greater detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M5
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-330
71
focusing manually
decent megapixels (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
33
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
features face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M5 as a Street photography camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Street photography camera
82
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
supports touch focus
environment sealing
good high ISO (25,600)
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (158 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 Sports photography information
Olympus VR-330 Sports photography information
67
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
environment sealing
does not have phase detect AF
47
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
features tracking autofocus
no shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 Travel photography advice
Olympus VR-330 Travel photography advice
66
environment sealing
supports touch focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
missing Timelapse mode
does not have selfie friendly screen
70
lighter than competition (158g)
decent megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
missing Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 Landscape photography advice
Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography advice
73
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
environment sealing
missing Timelapse mode
42
really wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Vlogging camera
34
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not have selfie friendly screen
missing external microphone jack
32
really wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection autofocus
lighter than competition (158g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external mic socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 and Olympus VR-330
 Olympus OM-D E-M5Olympus VR-330
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus VR-330
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2012-04-30 2011-02-08
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VI TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 25600 1600
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW photos
Lowest enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 35 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Screen resolution 610 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 1,440 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 9.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 425g (0.94 pounds) 158g (0.35 pounds)
Physical dimensions 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 71 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 22.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 826 not tested
Other
Battery life 360 photographs -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLN-1 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at release $799 $220