Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fe3d/7fe3d95a6f88c80bfaa18f73df4aba10c7f45067" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 front Olympus OM-D E-M5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a103/1a1032f1dfd06714b7350ef1b9a38b554f7326fa" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II front Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II front"
55 Imaging
54 Features
82 Overall
65
Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Announced April 2012
- Successor is Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 808g - 136 x 97 x 132mm
- Announced February 2019
- Previous Model is Panasonic FZ1000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Olympus E-M5 versus Panasonic FZ1000 II, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-M5 (16MP) and the FZ1000 II (20MP) is very similar but the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and FZ1000 II (1") use totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-M5 was brought out 7 years before the FZ1000 II which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-M5 matches up versus the FZ1000 II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 & Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 Gallery & Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Panasonic FZ1000 II
E-M5 | FZ1000 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 II over the Olympus E-M5
FZ1000 II | E-M5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2019 | ![]() | April 2012 | Newer by 82 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 610k | Crisper display (+630k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Panasonic FZ1000 II
E-M5 | FZ1000 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 features outer dimensions of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ1000 II has proportions of 136mm x 97mm x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") having a weight of 808 grams (1.78 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M5 versus Panasonic FZ1000 II in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M5 compared to the FZ1000 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5dff/f5dffb4b6ae783df10a7bb5b7e23c456400f1631" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 and FZ1000 II is 81 and 55 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2140/e2140f471e26efb6c6eab2d90c9816ebb1cfd9e1" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 and FZ1000 II.
Clearly, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M5 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic FZ1000 II will offer more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged E-M5 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44dd1/44dd1f854f0bf908184a03630300db85ce7b7ab2" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27bf6/27bf6375145e4964a63a51ffdfc82f410d663fc4" alt="Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2012-04-30 | 2019-02-18 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 610k dot | 1,240k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440k dot | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 13.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off, 1st / 2nd Slow Sync. |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 425 gr (0.94 pounds) | 808 gr (1.78 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 136 x 97 x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 71 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 826 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | 350 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $799 | $898 |