Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Released April 2010
- Older Model is Olympus E-P1
- New Model is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Superseded the Olympus TG-3
- Successor is Olympus TG-5
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-4, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and TG-4 (16MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and TG-4 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-P2 was announced 6 years prior to the TG-4 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-P2 matches up versus the TG-4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P2 & Olympus Tough TG-4. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-P2 Gallery & Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus TG-4
E-P2 | TG-4 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus E-P2
TG-4 | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2015 | April 2010 | More modern by 60 months | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-4
E-P2 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P2 has got external measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Olympus TG-4 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-4 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-P2 and the TG-4.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P2 and TG-4 is 86 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes merely by seeing specs. The picture below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P2 and TG-4.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-P2 with its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus TG-4 will provide extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged E-P2 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-04-22 | 2015-04-13 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic V | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 pounds) | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 380 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $799 | $379 |