Clicky

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
 
Olympus Tough TG-4 front
Portability
90
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs

Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Released April 2010
  • Older Model is Olympus E-P1
  • New Model is Olympus E-P3
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Revealed April 2015
  • Superseded the Olympus TG-3
  • Successor is Olympus TG-5
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview

Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-4, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and TG-4 (16MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and TG-4 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-P2 was announced 6 years prior to the TG-4 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera.

Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-P2 matches up versus the TG-4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus TG-4

 E-P2 TG-4 

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus E-P2

 TG-4 E-P2 
RevealedApril 2015April 2010More modern by 60 months
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-4

 E-P2 TG-4 
Focus manually More exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display sizing
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P2 has got external measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Olympus TG-4 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-4 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-P2 and the TG-4.

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P2 and TG-4 is 86 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes merely by seeing specs. The picture below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P2 and TG-4.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-P2 with its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus TG-4 will provide extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged E-P2 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-P2
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-4
60
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
low resolution (12MP)
47
focusing manually
decent megapixels (16MP)
includes face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-P2
Street photography with Olympus TG-4
74
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
environment proofing
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
more heavy than average in class (247g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-P2
Sports photography with Olympus TG-4
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
low resolution (12 megapixels)
not so great battery (300 CIPA)
no phase detect AF
48
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
environment proofing
better than average battery life (380 CIPA)
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-P2 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-4 as a Travel photography camera
43
no Timelapse recording
not so great battery (300 CIPA)
low resolution (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
74
better than average battery life (380 per charge)
environment proofing
decent megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than average in class (247 grams)
does not have selfie friendly screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-P2
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-4
60
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
low resolution (12MP)
not so great battery (300 shots)
no Timelapse recording
62
focusing manually
reasonably wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16MP)
delivers RAW formats
environment proofing
better than average battery life (380 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Vlogging details
Olympus TG-4 Vlogging details
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detect focusing
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no microphone port
34
reasonably wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not have selfie friendly screen
missing external microphone port
more heavy than average in class (247g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-4
 Olympus PEN E-P2Olympus Tough TG-4
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus PEN E-P2 Olympus Tough TG-4
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Released 2010-04-22 2015-04-13
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic V TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 6400 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 11 25
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 7.90 m (at ISO 1600)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 355 gr (0.78 pounds) 247 gr (0.54 pounds)
Physical dimensions 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light rating 505 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photographs 380 photographs
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-1 LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Storage slots One One
Price at release $799 $379