Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be63/1be634b2f2bf264599e2a54a79bc6275d8abc005" alt="Olympus PEN E-P2 front Olympus PEN E-P2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07841/0784163336d0cb666d56989c0f306f52fdaab95d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-4 front Olympus Tough TG-4 front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Released April 2010
- Older Model is Olympus E-P1
- New Model is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Superseded the Olympus TG-3
- Successor is Olympus TG-5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-4, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and TG-4 (16MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and TG-4 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-P2 was announced 6 years prior to the TG-4 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-P2 matches up versus the TG-4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P2 & Olympus Tough TG-4. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-P2 Gallery & Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus TG-4
E-P2 | TG-4 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus E-P2
TG-4 | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2015 | ![]() | April 2010 | More modern by 60 months |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-4
E-P2 | TG-4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-P2 has got external measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) and the Olympus TG-4 has dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-P2 and Olympus TG-4 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-P2 and the TG-4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ad08/4ad08bf7eff50d9edb60c7ee72088a39657f711e" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P2 and TG-4 is 86 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a6f9/3a6f95919f7b706edbdf80a2525401679af39560" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes merely by seeing specs. The picture below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P2 and TG-4.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-P2 with its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus TG-4 will provide extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged E-P2 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01c36/01c36240b862c38d80e6a9f401e86508d5ac2e55" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43932/439324828a37ca524364c66ac1a7360d8cc2826e" alt="Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-P2 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-04-22 | 2015-04-13 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic V | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 pounds) | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 380 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $799 | $379 |