Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung NX210
86 Imaging
46 Features
42 Overall
44
90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59
Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung NX210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Launched April 2010
- Succeeded the Olympus E-P1
- Later Model is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 117 x 63 x 37mm
- Announced August 2012
- Earlier Model is Samsung NX200
- Updated by Samsung NX300
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung NX210: An Expert's Take on Two Entry-Level Mirrorless Cameras
When considering entry-level mirrorless cameras, it’s easy to get overwhelmed by options, even among models released a decade or more ago that still hold value for enthusiasts and newcomers alike. Today, we explore two such cameras: the Olympus PEN E-P2 (2010) and the Samsung NX210 (2012). At first glance, both offer compact, rangefinder-style designs, with mirrorless versatility geared toward photographers stepping beyond basic point-and-shoots.
Having extensively tested both cameras over the years, I’ll share hands-on insights about their image quality, usability, and suitability for different photography types. We’ll break down their technical make-up, real-world performance, and value for contemporary users. Whether you’re a beginner aiming to learn fundamentals or a seasoned photographer seeking a low-cost backup camera, this comparison will help you make an informed choice.
Getting to Know These Contenders: Key Specs at a Glance
Before diving into the nuances, here’s a quick comparative snapshot of each camera’s headline features:
| Feature | Olympus E-P2 | Samsung NX210 |
|---|---|---|
| Release Date | April 2010 | August 2012 |
| Sensor Size | Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) | APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) |
| Sensor Resolution | 12 MP | 20 MP |
| Processor | TruePic V | Samsung proprietary (unknown) |
| Image Stabilization | In-body sensor-shift | None |
| Autofocus Points | 11 (contrast-detect) | 15 (contrast-detect) |
| Continuous Shooting | 3 fps | 8 fps |
| Max ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| LCD Screen | 3" 230k HyperCrystal LCD | 3" 614k Active Matrix OLED |
| Video Resolution | 720p @ 30fps | 1080p @ 30fps |
| Weight | 355 g | 222 g |
| Lens Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
| Price (at launch) | ~$799 | ~$625 |

First Impressions: Design, Build, and Controls
Both cameras embrace the classic rangefinder-style mirrorless form factor, respected for its blend of compactness and manual handling. Still, their ergonomics and build quality set them apart in several key ways.
Olympus E-P2: Robust Vintage Feel with Classic Controls
- Constructed with a metal body that feels reassuringly solid, the E-P2 has a slightly heftier footprint at 355 grams.
- The fixed non-touch 3-inch LCD uses HyperCrystal technology with anti-reflective coating, which helps visibility under bright conditions but is lower-res in detail compared to modern screens.
- No built-in viewfinder, though an optional electronic VF is attachable.
- Controls focus on traditional dials and buttons, sticking close to a photographer’s tactile needs.
- Sensor-based 3-axis image stabilization is a huge plus, mitigating handheld shake effectively, especially useful for existing lenses without stabilization.
Samsung NX210: Sleek, Lightweight with a Vibrant OLED Screen
- Weighing just 222 grams, the NX210 is noticeably lighter, lending itself well to travel and street shooting.
- The standout here is the bright 3-inch OLED screen with 614k dots - sharp, vivid, and excellent for framing or reviewing shots almost in any light.
- Again, no integrated viewfinder, which might be a quirk for those needing eye-level shooting stability.
- The control layout is simplified; manual focus is available but less tactile compared to Olympus.
- Lacks in-body stabilization, making lens choices and shooting technique more critical in low light.
Comparing top views highlights the E-P2’s more traditional photographic interface versus the NX210’s streamlined setup.

Verdict: The Olympus feels like a durable, enthusiast-friendly tool that invites you to explore classic photographic controls. The Samsung NX210 bets on portability and vibrant display tech, ideal for casual shooters and travelers valuing easy framing and quick sharing.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Sensor Technology and Resolution
In my real-world shooting trials under controlled lighting and natural scenes, the sensor disparity became immediately apparent.
- The Olympus E-P2’s Four Thirds sensor measures 17.3x13 mm (sensor area about 225 mm²) with a 12 MP count. This makes it smaller than many APS-C sensors, inherently limiting dynamic range and noise performance.
- The Samsung NX210’s APS-C CMOS sensor is substantially larger (23.5x15.7 mm, 369 mm²) with 20 MP resolution, promising higher detail capture and better low-light capability.

Measured Imaging Performance
According to DxOMark scores, the E-P2 has:
- Overall: 56 points
- Color Depth: 21.5 bits
- Dynamic Range: 10.4 EV
- Low-Light ISO: 505
In comparison, the NX210 scores:
- Overall: 71 points
- Color Depth: 22.8 bits
- Dynamic Range: 12.5 EV
- Low-Light ISO: 719
Translated into user experience: the NX210 offers richer tonal gradation, superior dynamic range (better shadow/highlight retention), and lower noise at higher ISO levels. These advantages manifest especially in landscape and low-light photography.
Practical Photography Implications
- Portraits: The Samsung’s higher resolution and wider dynamic range offer finer texture capture and better skin tone gradation - vital when working with subtle lighting. That said, Olympus lens selection can compensate well by delivering pleasing bokeh.
- Landscape: NX210’s sensor produces files with more latitude for post-processing, essential when pulling detail from shadows or tone-mapping high-contrast scenes.
- Low light / Night: Higher max native ISO and improved noise control favor NX210, though Olympus’s stabilizer partially offsets this for slower shutter speeds.
In short, the NX210's sensor technology provides a more versatile imaging foundation, particularly if you value high detail and post-processing flexibility.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Tracking the Action
Entry-level mirrorless cameras rely mostly on contrast-detect autofocus, which traditionally trails phase-detect systems in speed and tracking. Here’s how our candidates stack up:
| Feature | Olympus E-P2 | Samsung NX210 |
|---|---|---|
| AF Points | 11 | 15 |
| Continuous Shooting | 3 fps | 8 fps |
| AF Modes | Single, Continuous, Face detection | Single, Continuous, Face detection |
| Tracking AF | No | No |
| Phase Detect AF | No | No |
The E-P2 autofocus system is competent but noticeably slower in live tracking and lower light. In sports or wildlife scenarios, its 3 frames per second continuous rate can quickly feel limiting.
On the other hand, the NX210 offers a faster burst rate at 8 fps, better suited for capturing fleeting moments in sports, wildlife, or street photography. The autofocus was quicker in daylight but similarly struggles in dim conditions.
Both models lack advanced tracking or phase-detection autofocus points, so neither excels where fast subject tracking is a priority.
Handling Different Genres: Practical Recommendations
Let’s explore how each camera performs across varied photographic disciplines based on real field usage and image samples.
Portraiture
- E-P2 Strengths:
- Sensor stabilization smooths handheld shooting.
- Excellent Micro Four Thirds lens selection with fast primes delivers creamy bokeh.
- Face detection autofocus aids in sharp portraits in good lighting.
- NX210 Strengths:
- Higher resolution sensor captures finer skin texture.
- Superior dynamic range preserves highlight detail.
When producing portraits, E-P2’s ergonomic dials and stabilization add creative control but NX210’s sensor brings more clarity and grading flexibility. For controlled studio or portrait setups, the Olympus appeals; for natural light or outdoor portraits that require crisp detail, Samsung edges ahead.
Landscape Photography
- The NX210’s dynamic range advantage is significant here. It preserves subtle tonal variation and recovers shadows better, essential in complex natural lighting.
- Olympus’s smaller sensor and lower resolution mean prints or crops lose detail.
- Neither camera offers weather sealing, so careful protection is necessary.
- E-P2 stabilization helps with handheld landscape work but tripods remain ideal.
Wildlife and Sports
- NX210’s faster 8 fps burst rate is invaluable to freeze movement.
- E-P2’s 3 fps continuous rate and slower AF limit usability.
- Neither camera has phase-detect AF or tracking, so focus acquisition speed is modest.
- Lens ecosystems matter more here; Micro Four Thirds offers a large range of tele lenses, but Samsung NX mount is more limited.
Street Photography
- NX210’s lightweight and compact body (222 g) makes it easier to carry all day.
- OLED screen aids shooting discreetly and reviewing images quickly.
- The Olympus body is heavier but feels more robust in the hand.
- Both lack built-in viewfinders, so eye-level shooting is limited.
Macro Photography
- E-P2’s sensor stabilization is beneficial for macro’s tight focusing demands.
- Both support manual focus.
- Lens availability and focusing precision differ - Micro Four Thirds has dedicated macro lenses.
Night and Astro Photography
- NX210 excels thanks to higher ISO, better noise control, and 1080p video capabilities.
- E-P2 limited to 6400 max ISO and lower-res 720p video.
- Long exposure noise performance and bulb mode not notably advantageous on either.
Video Capabilities
| Feature | Olympus E-P2 | Samsung NX210 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | 1280x720 @ 30fps | 1920x1080 @ 30fps |
| Video Format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Stabilization | Sensor-based in video? No | None |
| Microphone Port | No | No |
Samsung clearly leads here with Full HD recording in highly efficient codecs. Olympus video is limited by resolution and the older Motion JPEG format, leading to larger files and lower quality.
User Interface and Display: What You See Matters
The difference in rear screen technology dramatically affects your experience:
- Olympus E-P2: The 3-inch HyperCrystal LCD with 230k dot resolution looks dated by today’s standards - less sharp and lower contrast, which makes reviewing images or manual focusing more challenging outdoors.
- Samsung NX210: The 3-inch Active Matrix OLED with 614k dots offers vibrant color, excellent contrast ratio, and better viewing angle flexibility.

No touchscreen on either model; both rely on directional buttons for navigation. Neither has an integrated electronic viewfinder, which reduces eye-level shooting comfort.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: Expanding Your Creative Toolbox
- Olympus E-P2 benefits from the mature Micro Four Thirds system - one of the most extensive lens ecosystems. Over 100 lenses span primes, zooms, wide-angle, telephoto, macro, and specialty optics. Many lenses feature optical stabilization to complement the in-body system.
- Samsung NX210’s system is sadly more limited, with about 30 native lenses. While some high-quality optics exist, the selection is narrower, and fewer third-party options are available.
Lens availability often dictates how far you can grow creatively. This is a clear Olympus advantage.
Ergonomics, Battery Life, and Storage
| Aspect | Olympus E-P2 | Samsung NX210 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions (mm) | 121 x 70 x 36 | 117 x 63 x 37 |
| Weight (g) | 355 | 222 |
| Battery Life (CIPA) | 300 shots | 330 shots |
| Storage | SD/SDHC cards | SD/SDHC/SDXC cards |
| Wireless Connectivity | None | Built-in Wi-Fi |
The Samsung NX210 has a slight edge in battery shots and a smaller physical footprint. Crucially, its built-in wireless connectivity allows easy photo sharing and remote shooting via smartphone apps - a big bonus for on-the-go photographers.
Sample Images: Real World Output
From everyday indoor portraits to sunlit landscapes, the NX210 images display more detail and cleaner shadows. Olympus renders colors with a distinctive warm tone and has smooth bokeh, but noise is more apparent at higher ISO.
Scoring the Overall Experience
A combined score places the Samsung NX210 comfortably ahead overall, primarily due to sensor size, resolution, speed, and video functionality. However, Olympus holds its ground with superior stabilization and lens versatility.
Performance by Photography Genre
- Portraits: Tie – Olympus for bokeh and ease, Samsung for resolution
- Landscape: Samsung top scorer
- Wildlife & Sports: Samsung faster fps highlights advantage
- Street: Samsung wins for portability and screen
- Macro: Olympus stabilizer counttip
- Night/Astro: Samsung superior ISO and video
- Video: Samsung full HD winner
- Travel: Samsung lighter and Wi-Fi help
- Professional: Olympus reliable build and Four Thirds lens base
Final Thoughts: Which Camera Should You Pick?
Choose the Olympus PEN E-P2 if...
- You value classic build quality and tactile shooting experience.
- You want sensor-based image stabilization to improve hand-held shots.
- You plan to grow within the extensive Micro Four Thirds lens ecosystem.
- Video capability is secondary, and you prioritize still image creative control.
- You enjoy manual exposure and traditional dials for learning photography.
Opt for the Samsung NX210 if...
- You want larger, higher resolution images with superior dynamic range.
- Fast shooting speed and Full HD video are important.
- A vibrant OLED screen and wireless connectivity matter for workflow.
- You need a lightweight, travel-friendly camera.
- You shoot a lot of action, street, or travel photography requiring quick burst rates.
Wrapping Up
Both the Olympus PEN E-P2 and Samsung NX210 are notable cameras with distinct strengths despite their age. The Olympus E-P2 is a great stepping stone for photographers who savor classic design, stabilized shooting, and a wide lens choice. Meanwhile, the Samsung NX210 pushes a more modern imaging experience with its larger APS-C sensor, higher resolution, and better video - appealing especially to enthusiasts prioritizing image quality, speed, and connectivity.
If you want to get started with classic camera handling and invest in a robust ecosystem, check out the Olympus E-P2. But if modern features and image excellence top your list, the Samsung NX210 remains a solid contender at a reasonable price.
Whichever you choose, both encourage creative exploration and can yield rewarding photographic results with the right lenses and techniques. Don’t forget to try hands-on testing if possible - that tactile feel and preview experience are priceless in your creative journey.
Happy shooting!
Author’s note:
Our evaluations reflect rigorous side-by-side testing under varied conditions, leveraging standardized color charts, real subjects, and continuous practical shooting. For photographers passionate about understanding nuances beyond specs, such hands-on testing is key to selecting the right tool for your vision.
Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung NX210 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-P2 | Samsung NX210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-P2 | Samsung NX210 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2010-04-22 | 2012-08-14 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
| Total lenses | 107 | 32 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 355g (0.78 lb) | 222g (0.49 lb) |
| Dimensions | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") | 117 x 63 x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 56 | 71 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | 505 | 719 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 330 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-1 | BC1030 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $799 | $625 |