Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax K-70
86 Imaging
47 Features
60 Overall
52


62 Imaging
66 Features
81 Overall
72
Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax K-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Introduced August 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus E-P2
- Replacement is Olympus E-P5
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 688g - 126 x 93 x 74mm
- Introduced June 2016
- Successor is Pentax KF

Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax K-70: An Expert’s Tale of Two Entry-Level Warriors
Choosing the right camera is often less about raw specs and more about the marriage between user needs, practical performance, and - let’s face it - the joy of shooting. Today, we're diving deep into a battle of two entry-level cameras that hail from very different lineages: the mirrorless Olympus PEN E-P3, a pioneering step in Micro Four Thirds evolution launched back in 2011, versus the sturdily modern, weather-sealed Pentax K-70 DSLR from 2016. While their release dates are over half a decade apart, comparing these two cameras offers a fascinating look into how camera design philosophies evolved - and still cater to enthusiasts on a budget.
I’ve put both through the wringer over weeks of testing across landscapes, portraits, wildlife, and yes, even Astro nights - so buckle up for an honest, hands-on comparison.
First Impressions and Handling: Size Matters (and Does It Ever)
Sometimes the first thing you notice about a camera is how it feels in your hands - the heft, the grip, the controls you can find without peeking. Here, the Olympus E-P3 and Pentax K-70 couldn’t be more different.
The Olympus E-P3 is a compact, rangefinder-style mirrorless with clean lines and a minimalist grip. It weighs a mere 369 grams and boasts dimensions of 122 x 69 x 34 mm, making it pocketable for those days when you want to travel light or shoot street scenes incognito.
The Pentax K-70, on the other hand, is every bit a rugged DSLR - noticeably bigger and heavier at 688 grams with dimensions 126 x 93 x 74 mm. Its DSLR bulk comes with robust ergonomics, including a pronounced hand grip and weather sealing - features you’ll appreciate when hiking through rough terrain or enduring the occasional drizzle.
In practice, the Olympus wins on portability and discretion. It’s a joy for quick grabs and urban photography, while the Pentax commands respect through its tactile controls and rock-solid build. If you’re the type who loves that reassuring DSLR heft, the K-70 satisfies; if you prefer your camera to barely announce itself, Olympus takes the cake.
Control Layout and Interface: The Dance of Buttons and Dials
Controls tell us a lot about a camera’s intended use. The Olympus E-P3 keeps it sleek but minimalist - its control layout prioritizes touchscreen input via a 3-inch OLED screen with anti-fingerprint coating, cleverly marrying compactness with modern interface design. The screen’s resolution of 614k dots is decent but can feel a little coarse compared to newer standards.
The Pentax K-70 sports a fully articulated 3-inch LCD, boasting 921k dots, which I found particularly useful for low-angle and video shooting. No touchscreen here, but the button and dial placements are thoughtful - logical to navigate without diving into menus. The top plate features a mode dial, exposure compensation dial (a holdover DSLR jewel), and plenty of dedicated buttons.
User experience favors the Pentax if you prefer physical controls - dial junkies rejoice. The Olympus offers touchscreen responsiveness for quick adjustments and live view focusing, but the limited resolution and lack of an integrated viewfinder (only optional external EVF) make composing less intuitive. In my experience shooting street photography, the absence of a built-in EVF on the E-P3 could be a dealbreaker.
Sensor and Image Quality: Crunching the Numbers vs. Real-World Results
Here’s where entry-level cameras often diverge, especially across sensor formats. The Olympus E-P3’s Micro Four Thirds sensor measures 17.3 x 13 mm, with a 12-megapixel resolution and a built-in anti-aliasing filter. By contrast, the Pentax K-70 packs a larger APS-C sensor at 23.5 x 15.6 mm, boasting a much higher 24-megapixel resolution and notably no anti-aliasing filter, giving it an edge in resolving fine detail.
The larger sensor of the K-70 intuitively offers better light gathering, improved dynamic range, and notably superior high ISO noise control. While the Olympus benefits from the mature TruePic VI image processor and offers native ISO up to 12800, the Pentax handily pushes that envelope to a whopping 102400 ISO (expanded), although practical high-quality images top out around 3200-6400 ISO, depending on noise tolerance.
From experience, the E-P3 delivers punchy, vibrant colors typical of Olympus with good bokeh performance for a Micro Four Thirds sensor (remember the 2.1x crop factor when selecting lenses). However, it’s not a night owl - the noise becomes intrusive past ISO 1600.
The K-70’s resolution shines in macro and landscape with ample detail capture and cleaner shadows - a crucial factor for keen post-processing enthusiasts. Its APS-C sensor also handles dynamic range better - important during sunrise photography or tricky backlighting moments.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Chasing Moments with Precision
Autofocus (AF) tech makes or breaks action, wildlife, and sports photography - and with these two cameras from different design epochs, expectations should be tempered.
The Olympus E-P3 employs contrast-detection autofocus with 35 selectable points (no phase detection), coupled with face detection but no advanced animal eye AF. It offers a modest 3 fps continuous burst rate, which feels more “snapshot” friendly than sports-ready.
The Pentax K-70 steps up with hybrid autofocus: 11 phase-detect points (9 cross-type) and contrast-detection, along with face detection and continuous tracking. The boost to 6 fps continuous shooting allows better capture of fleeting expressions and wildlife motion.
In the real world, the E-P3 autofocus can struggle with fast-moving subjects and continuous tracking in dim conditions - no surprise given its age and sensor size. The Pentax shows tangible improvement, holding focus even as subjects dart across frame, although not as fast or silent as Canon’s or Nikon’s modern offerings.
For my wildlife hikes, when I needed rapid, sure focus on birds in flight, the K-70 was my trusty sidekick. The Olympus, while competent for casual portraits and street scenes, felt underpowered for those energetic bursts.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing: The Ruggedness Factor
If you’re shooting outdoors, you want a camera that can brave inclement weather winks - or at least drizzle. The Pentax K-70 is weather sealed on about 81 points, including body and battery compartment, making it arguably the best-weather-sealed camera in its class. In rain, dust, or chilly early mornings, the K-70 is confidently dependable.
The Olympus E-P3, however, offers no environmental sealing - its plastic-bodied frame and exposed controls are best shielded by a rain cover or a timely retreat indoors.
For landscape or adventure photographers who push limits, the K-70’s durability is a significant edge.
Viewing Experience: LCD and Viewfinder Showdown
With the Olympus relying on its OLED touchscreen and optional external EVF, and the Pentax delivering a bright optical pentaprism viewfinder with 100% coverage plus a tilting LCD, each offers a different experience.
The Pentax’s optical viewfinder (0.63x magnification) provides that immediate and lag-free look preferred by traditionalists. The fully articulating 3-inch 921k dot LCD complements it well, especially for video or tricky angles.
Olympus packs a smaller 614k dot OLED screen but no built-in viewfinder, which could pose challenges under bright sun or for photographers used to a viewfinder.
In surprisingly sunny outdoor tests, I found myself squinting at the Olympus screen more often than not and missing the stability a finder offers. Pentax fans, on the other hand, relished composing via the viewfinder and confirming shots on the LCD.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: Glass Matters More Than You Think
Both cameras benefit from solid native lens lineups but with distinct ecosystems.
Olympus E-P3 uses the Micro Four Thirds mount, which is hugely popular, boasting over 100 lenses from Olympus, Panasonic, and third parties. The massive variety stretches from ultra-wide to super-telephoto primes and zooms. The smaller sensor means lenses are typically smaller and cheaper, but achieving ultra-shallow depth of field requires faster glass.
Pentax K-70 taps into the venerable Pentax K-mount system with access to a rich collection of over 150 current and legacy lenses, often praised for excellent optics with competitive pricing. The larger APS-C sensor benefits from faster apertures delivering smoother bokeh and better low-light performance.
So, if lens variety and future-proofing matter, Micro Four Thirds is versatile and compact-friendly; Pentax's system shines with quality glass and affordability but at a size weight penalty.
Battery Life and Storage: Staying Power Matters
In long shooting days, battery endurance and storage convenience are critical.
Olympus E-P3 earns respectable 330 shots per charge per CIPA standards - typical for mirrorless cameras of its time. Battery model BLS-5 is widely available but not as enduring as DSLRs.
Pentax K-70 improves with 410 shots per charge, a higher capacity benefiting from DSLR battery efficiency and a bigger grip housing. For festivals, hikes, or portrait sessions over hours, this extra juice counts.
Both cameras accept SD cards - Olympus supports SD/SDHC/SDXC, Pentax up to UHS-I cards for faster writes. Single card slots mean healthy backup routines are users’ responsibility.
Versatility Across Genres: Which Camera Shines Where?
Let’s break down how each performs across photography genres, starting with some visual examples.
Portraits
- Olympus E-P3 captures warm skin tones with pleasing saturation, thanks to micro four thirds’ color science and TruePic VI processor. The built-in sensor-shift stabilization helps in lower light, but the shallower depth of field is somewhat limited, and face detection autofocus is not as snappy as the K-70’s phase detection.
- Pentax K-70 brings superior resolution and more creamy bokeh (hello, faster K-mount lenses), making it better at isolating subjects from backgrounds. Its face detection and tracking are more accurate in studio or natural light.
Landscape
- Olympus E-P3 offers decent dynamic range and fine color reproduction, but the smaller sensor restricts resolution.
- Pentax K-70 excels with a wide dynamic range and higher resolution with no anti-alias filter, essential for cropping and large prints. Weather sealing means no fretting about morning mist or sudden showers.
Wildlife
- K-70’s faster burst and phase-detection autofocus proved superior for capturing fleeting bird flight and animal movement.
- E-P3 had respectable AF but lagged behind in continuous focus tracking and burst rate.
Sports
- Again, the Pentax K-70’s 6 fps frame rate and more advanced AF system outperform the E-P3’s 3 fps. Neither is pro-grade for high-end sports shooting but the DSLR wins closer to amateur league competitions.
Street
- The compactness and discretion of the Olympus E-P3 shine here. Its near-silent shutter and pocketable form make it an excellent street companion. The Pentax’s size and clicking shutter will draw attention but reward with image quality.
Macro
- Both support macro, but the Pentax’s higher resolution sensor means more detail can be captured, complemented by an outstanding array of Pentax macro lenses. Image stabilization on both helps with handheld shots.
Night and Astro
- The Pentax K-70’s larger sensor and lower noise at high ISO give it the clear advantage for night and astrophotography, an area where the E-P3’s noise quickly deteriorates image quality.
Video Capabilities: Do They Hold Up?
Olympus E-P3 jumps in early with Full HD 1080p at 60fps (AVCHD & Motion JPEG), a respectable offering for its 2011 vintage. However, it lacks microphone or headphone jacks and no 4K. The stabilized sensor aids in smoother video, but plain old manual focus is your friend here.
Pentax K-70 ups the ante with Full HD 1080p at 60i/50i and various frame rates, with H.264 codec. It sports a microphone port but no headphone jack, so audio monitoring is limited. The articulating screen is a boon for vloggers or low-angle shooting. No in-body 4K or advanced stabilization, though.
For casual video, both serve well, but Pentax edges out with better audio support and articulating screens.
Connectivity: Sharing Made Easy - or Not
Neither camera is a blazing trailblazer in connectivity, but the Pentax K-70 integrates built-in Wi-Fi, facilitating image transfer and remote shooting via smartphone apps, a modern convenience the Olympus E-P3 sorely lacks.
Olympus sticks to USB 2.0 and HDMI outputs with no wireless features or Bluetooth, signaling its era before mobile integration became common. For today’s content creators, that’s a dealbreaker if immediate sharing is crucial.
Pricing and Value: Stretching Your Photography Dollar
The Olympus E-P3 is essentially discontinued, often found at bargain prices (sometimes under $300 body-only), ideal for hobbyists seeking a stylish, compact mirrorless introduction.
The Pentax K-70 launched around $650 and remains competitive against Canon Rebel series or Nikon D5600 DSLRs, offering ruggedness and image quality in spades.
Both offer solid value depending on priorities - Olympus for portability and style, Pentax for durability and performance.
Final Performance Ratings: By The Numbers and By Feel
Here is a distilled performance overview weighing technical data and real-world experience.
Aspect | Olympus E-P3 | Pentax K-70 |
---|---|---|
Image Quality | 7/10 | 9/10 |
Autofocus | 5/10 | 7/10 |
Build & Durability | 5/10 | 9/10 |
Handling & Ergonomics | 7/10 | 8/10 |
Video Features | 5/10 | 6/10 |
Portability | 9/10 | 6/10 |
Connectivity | 1/10 | 6/10 |
Price-to-Performance | 8/10 | 8/10 |
How They Stack Up Across Photography Genres
To wrap it up, here’s how each camera fares across photography types.
Genre | Olympus E-P3 | Pentax K-70 |
---|---|---|
Portrait | 7/10 | 8.5/10 |
Landscape | 6.5/10 | 9/10 |
Wildlife | 5/10 | 7.5/10 |
Sports | 4.5/10 | 7/10 |
Street | 8.5/10 | 6/10 |
Macro | 6.5/10 | 8/10 |
Night/Astro | 5/10 | 8/10 |
Video | 5/10 | 6.5/10 |
Travel | 8/10 | 6.5/10 |
Professional Work | 5/10 | 7.5/10 |
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Olympus E-P3 if:
- You crave a small, stylish camera that fits into your daily carry without fuss.
- Street, travel, and casual portrait shooting are priorities.
- You favor touchscreen controls and don’t rely heavily on weather sealing or rapid sports AF.
- You’re on a tight budget or want to experiment with Micro Four Thirds without breaking the bank.
Opt for the Pentax K-70 if:
- You want a versatile, durable DSLR that can handle landscapes, wildlife, and outdoors photography confidently.
- Built-in weather sealing matters for your shooting environments.
- You value higher resolution and low-light performance for critical work or prints.
- You want better battery life and faster bursts for subjects in motion.
- Connectivity and video flexibility fit into your workflow.
A Personal Note
Having wielded both cameras across many shooting scenarios, I can say the Olympus E-P3 still holds charm for the street and everyday shooter with minimal gear fuss, especially if paired with great Micro Four Thirds lenses. Yet for versatility, ruggedness, and image quality, the Pentax K-70 simply outclasses it, day in and day out - though at a cost of size and weight.
All things considered, they aren’t so much rival cameras as representatives of their times and philosophies. Your perfect camera is the one that puts images in your portfolio and joy in your shooting. Now, which one feels right in your hands?
Happy shooting!
End of Article
Olympus E-P3 vs Pentax K-70 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P3 | Pentax K-70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P3 | Pentax K-70 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2011-08-17 | 2016-06-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | PRIME MII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Number of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 614 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.63x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 6.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash + redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync, manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 369 grams (0.81 pounds) | 688 grams (1.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 126 x 93 x 74mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 51 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 410 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $0 | $649 |