Olympus E-P5 vs Pentax RZ10
85 Imaging
52 Features
76 Overall
61


92 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-P5 vs Pentax RZ10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Launched October 2013
- Old Model is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Announced July 2011

Olympus E-P5 vs Pentax RZ10: The Practical Photographer’s Guide to Choosing Your Next Camera
When you start hunting for a new camera - especially as a photography enthusiast or pro who genuinely needs gear that performs across a spectrum of shooting styles - it pays to look beyond the specs sheet and marketing hype. Two cameras you might stumble across in the “budget-conscious yet capable” category are the Olympus PEN E-P5 and the Pentax Optio RZ10. They come from very different design philosophies and eras, but both pitched themselves as user-friendly options aimed at people who want to capture everyday life and explore creative photography without breaking the bank.
Having extensively tested and owned a wide range of DSLRs, mirrorless systems, and compacts over the last 15 years, I’m sharing a no-fluff, hands-on comparison between these two models. My goal is to give you clear, practical insights into how they hold up in real-world shooting - in everything from portraits to wildlife - as well as their strengths and compromises. By the end, you’ll know exactly which camera matches your style, budget, and workflow.
Size and Ergonomics: First Impressions and Handling
The Olympus E-P5 and Pentax RZ10 couldn’t be more different physically. The E-P5 is a rangefinder-style mirrorless camera with a sturdy metal body, measuring 122x69x37 mm and weighing in at about 420g. It feels solid, with a decent heft that commands a confident grip. The RZ10 is a typical ultra-compact, pocketable point-and-shoot at 97x61x33 mm, and weighs a mere 178g.
Ergonomically, the Olympus wins hands down for extended sessions or more deliberate shooting. Its thoughtfully placed grip and clubs-for-thumb rear dial make it easy to change settings on the fly without fumbling. The Pentax is what I’d call a "grab-and-go" camera, great for travel or casual snaps but less suited to manual control or prolonged use.
The E-P5’s flagship mirrorless form factor allows the use of nearly 107 Micro Four Thirds lenses, from fast primes to versatile zooms. The RZ10’s fixed lens spans 28-280mm equivalent - an excellent zoom range for travel, but you’re locked into that single optical package. So, if lens flexibility is mission-critical, Olympus steals the show here.
Design, Control Layout, and User Interface: Command and Control
The Olympus E-P5 sports a more traditional, tactile camera interface, with dedicated dials for shutter speed and exposure compensation - a feature often missed on entry-level rigs. This lets you operate the camera almost entirely by feel, which is great for photography nerds who want creative control without stabbing blindly at menus. The screen tilts and supports capacitive touch, handy for selecting focus points and navigating menus swiftly.
In contrast, the Pentax RZ10 is minimalistic, with no exposure compensation dial or customizable buttons. Its fixed TFT screen is small and not touch-enabled, making quick adjustments a bit clumsier if you want to deviate from auto-mode. The RZ10 is clearly designed for casual users who prefer point-and-shoot simplicity.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Battle of the Sensors
Here’s where the two diverge most dramatically. The Olympus houses a 16MP Four Thirds-sized CMOS sensor (17.3x13 mm) with sensor-based 5-axis image stabilization - an engineering marvel that helps keep your shots sharp without needing a tripod. It offers an ISO range from 100 to a whopping 25600, making it capable of handling challenging low-light scenarios.
The Pentax opts for a tiny 1/2.3” CCD sensor (6.08x4.56 mm), representing just about a quarter of the area of the Olympus’s sensor. At 14MP native resolution and max ISO 6400, noise creeps in quickly at anything above ISO 400, which is typical for sensors this small. Also, CCD sensors tend to have lower dynamic range compared to modern CMOS chips, meaning that highlight and shadow detail can get crushed easily in HDR or contrast-heavy scenes.
In practical shooting tests, the Olympus produced cleaner, sharper images with richer colors and better tonal gradation. The Pentax shots look okay for casual sharing but lack the pop and fine detail for larger prints or serious post-production. If image quality is your top priority, the E-P5 has a clear advantage.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Performance in Motion
Autofocus systems can make or break your experience depending on your shooting style. The Olympus E-P5 uses a contrast-detection AF system with 35 focus points and face detection. Although it lacks phase-detection, which is generally faster, Olympus engineered the algorithms really well for the era, giving the E-P5 solid autofocus (AF) accuracy and decent speed in good lighting. It supports continuous AF for tracking moving subjects and nine frames per second burst shooting - plenty for casual sports or action photography.
By comparison, the Pentax RZ10 uses a simpler contrast-detection autofocus with just 9 focus points and no face or eye detection. The continuous shooting mode offers just one frame per second - far too slow for anything action-related. AF speed is pedestrian and can hunt significantly under low light, frustrating if you want to capture fleeting moments.
For wildlife or sports shooters who need fast, reliable AF, the Olympus is more trustworthy, although by today’s standards neither is a champion.
User Experience: The Viewfinder and LCD Displays
Neither camera offers a built-in electronic viewfinder (EVF). The Olympus supports an optional EVF accessory but to keep costs down, for most of us, we’re stuck using the LCD. The E-P5 features a 3.0” tilting capacitive touch screen with 1,037K dots - sharp and responsive, facilitating touch focus and menu navigation. The tilt aids creative angles, such as low-level portraits or overhead shots.
The Pentax’s 2.7” fixed TFT screen with 230K dots is dimmer and less detailed. Without a touchscreen, framing and manual focusing are more cumbersome. This screen suffices for casual users snapping vacations or family gatherings, but it won’t inspire inspired compositions or detailed manual focusing.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing: Ready for the Rugged Stuff?
The Olympus E-P5 sports a solid metal body that feels resilient, though it’s not fully weather sealed. It has some resistance to dust and splashes but should not be considered a rugged outdoor camera.
Surprisingly, the Pentax RZ10 advertises environmental sealing, which is rare for a compact. However, given its smaller size and lower-grade materials, I’d advise against pushing it into harsh conditions without protection. Neither camera is waterproof, shockproof, or freezeproof, so use common sense with both.
Battery Life and Storage: Power and Media Matters
The Olympus claims around 330 shots per charge, roughly average for a mirrorless body with a 3” LCD. In my real-world tests, it held up to a full day’s shooting with moderate display use and Wi-Fi connectivity. Charging via USB is supported but not rapid.
The Pentax is rated at 178 shots - not surprising for such a compact. You'll definitely want to carry spare batteries if you plan day trips or extensive shooting.
Both cameras use a single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot. The Olympus supports faster UHS-I speeds thanks to its design, facilitating quicker write times for RAW shooting. That’s huge if you want to shoot in burst or RAW continuously. The Pentax uses slower card types and has no RAW support - one giant tradeoff if you want editing flexibility.
Connectivity and Video: More Than Just Stills
In the Olympus camp, you get built-in Wi-Fi for wireless image transfers and remote shooting - a godsend for studio photographers or social media content creators. It records 1080p video at 30fps using the efficient H.264 codec, with reasonable image stabilization for handheld clips. Unfortunately, it lacks microphone and headphone ports, limiting professional audio control.
The Pentax lacks Wi-Fi and HDMI output. Video tops out at 720p with Motion JPEG compression - okay for quick clips but nowhere near professional video standards. No audio input options exist.
For vloggers or videographers, the Olympus is the better all-around performer given its full HD quality, stabilization, and Wi-Fi features.
Photography Use Cases: Who Should Pick Which Camera?
Let’s get down to brass tacks - how do these cameras serve different genres of photography?
Portrait Photography
-
Olympus E-P5: The 16MP sensor paired with Micro Four Thirds lenses gives you sharp images with smooth skin tones and creamy bokeh - especially if you invest in prime lenses with wide apertures. Face detection autofocus helps nail eye focus reliably.
-
Pentax RZ10: The fixed zoom lens with modest max aperture (F3.2-5.9) produces flat bokeh and less accurate skin tones; no eye detection can challenge composition. Better suited for snapshots than stylized portraits.
Landscape Photography
-
Olympus E-P5: Solid dynamic range (12.4 EV) lets you recover shadows and highlights; 4608x3456 resolution delivers decent print quality. Weather sealing is absent but body durability and lens options are good. Sensor stabilization helps with long exposures.
-
Pentax RZ10: Limited dynamic range and resolution, plus a sensor prone to noise limits image quality for landscapes. Environmental sealing aids in light weather but optical zoom flexibility is limited.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
-
Olympus E-P5: Burst at 9 fps with continuous AF is decent for casual sports photography. The 35 AF points and face detection helps track subjects, while the lens ecosystem supports big telephotos (albeit with a 2.1x crop factor).
-
Pentax RZ10: Frustrating slow 1 fps burst, slow AF, and no continuous AF mean missing most action shots. Zoom range is nice but image quality suffers at reach.
Street Photography
-
Olympus E-P5: With a compact rangefinder style and silent shutter (60Hz limit), the E-P5 is discreet. Its tilting touchscreen and quick controls make it flexible for candid photography.
-
Pentax RZ10: Ultra compact and light - very pocketable for street - but clunky controls and no eye detection limit reaction speed under dynamic urban scenes.
Macro Photography
-
Olympus E-P5: Compatible with lenses that focus close, plus 5-axis stabilization helps handheld macro shots. No dedicated focus stacking, but manual focus assists.
-
Pentax RZ10: Can focus from 1 cm, great for casual close-ups; stabilization helps but image quality limits final results.
Night and Astrophotography
-
Olympus E-P5: ISO 25600 range and low noise capability open up night shooting and astrophotography possibilities. Exposure bracketing and manual modes help capture star fields.
-
Pentax RZ10: ISO tops out at 6400, with heavy noise above 400; CCD sensor and lack of manual exposure make astrophotography difficult.
Video Capabilities
-
Olympus E-P5: Full HD at 30 fps, with stabilized handheld footage and Wi-Fi remote control. No pro audio inputs.
-
Pentax RZ10: HD 720p but limited by Motion JPEG and no stabilization for video.
Travel Photography
-
Olympus E-P5: Versatile in size, with lens options, Wi-Fi, and good battery life. Slightly heavier but more capable.
-
Pentax RZ10: Ultra-light, pocketable, and easy to carry. Great for cheapskates or those who prioritize portability over top quality.
Professional Work
-
Olympus E-P5: Supports RAW format, bracketing modes, and customizable controls. While not a flagship, it can serve as a backup or secondary body.
-
Pentax RZ10: No RAW support, slower operation, and limited control make it unsuitable for professional scenarios.
Scores and Value Assessment: Where Does Your Money Go?
The Olympus E-P5 scores strongly in image quality, autofocus capability, and video features, reflecting its mirrorless architecture and larger sensor advantage. The Pentax RZ10 ranks lower overall as a compact, excelling only in portability and zoom range.
Genre-Specific Ratings: Fine-Tuning Your Decision
- Portrait, landscape, and low-light shooting: Olympus leads.
- Travel and street: Pentax’s compact size edges it slightly for casual use.
- Action and wildlife: Olympus is clearly superior.
- Video production: Olympus preferable.
Sample Image Comparison: What You Can Expect to Capture
Side-by-side, Olympus images display richer color, greater detail, and cleaner shadows. Pentax photos shiny and bright up close but lose clarity on large display or print.
Summing Up: Pros and Cons at a Glance
Olympus E-P5 | Pentax RZ10 |
---|---|
Pros: Large Four Thirds sensor, 16MP resolution, 5-axis stabilization, quick 9 fps burst, tilting touchscreen, Wi-Fi, versatile Micro Four Thirds lens mount, solid build | Pros: Ultra-compact size, long 10x zoom range (28-280mm equiv.), environmental sealing, affordable |
Cons: No built-in EVF, heavier than compact, no mic/headphone jacks for video | Cons: Small 1/2.3" sensor with inferior image quality, slow AF and burst, no RAW support, limited video specs, small LCD |
Final Verdict: Which Camera Should You Buy?
If you’re a serious enthusiast or semi-pro wanting a camera that can grow with your skills, deliver excellent stills in most conditions, and provide creative control, the Olympus E-P5 is your best bet - and at $389 (used or refurbished price), it’s a bargain considering its strengths.
For casual shooters, travelers, or those on a tighter budget who want an ultralight camera with a big zoom range for quick shots and don’t plan heavy editing or action shooting, the Pentax RZ10 ticks useful boxes at under $200. Just temper your expectations on image quality and manual controls.
Personal Takeaway: Testing Truths
I remember taking the Olympus E-P5 on a weekend getaway trip. Its sensor-shift stabilization truly let me handhold long exposures on a cityscape walk, producing tack-sharp images I was proud to share and print. The customizable dials saved me from diving into menus every time lighting changed.
The RZ10, meanwhile, was excellent for a quick snapshot on the family picnic, slipping into a jacket pocket effortlessly. But I missed the manual controls and felt the image noise creeping in by evening.
Both cameras fill niches but address different photographic appetites. Choose based on what kind of photography excites you most.
I hope this assessment helps you pick the right tool to capture your moments with joy and creativity. Happy shooting!
End of comparison article
Olympus E-P5 vs Pentax RZ10 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P5 | Pentax Optio RZ10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P5 | Pentax Optio RZ10 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-10-03 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 9.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (ISO 100) | 2.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/320s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 420 gr (0.93 lb) | 178 gr (0.39 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 895 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 178 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $389 | $200 |