Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A9
85 Imaging
52 Features
76 Overall
61


65 Imaging
72 Features
93 Overall
80
Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Launched October 2013
- Old Model is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Bump to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 673g - 127 x 96 x 63mm
- Revealed April 2017
- Replacement is Sony A9 II

Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A9: The Real-World Comparison You’ve Been Waiting For
Choosing between the Olympus E-P5 and the Sony A9 is a classic clash of eras, philosophies, and technologies that define distinct chapters in mirrorless camera history. The E-P5, introduced in 2013 as a refined entry-level Micro Four Thirds system, contrasts sharply with the 2017-released pro-grade Sony A9, a flagship full-frame powerhouse built for speed and versatility. As someone who has spent well over a decade analyzing and testing cameras in studios, landscapes, and stadiums alike, I’ll take you on a deep dive across every essential photography discipline. Along the way, we’ll unravel sensor technology, autofocus behavior, build quality, and all the nuanced real-world details that matter when investing in your next photographic partner.
Let’s start by ballparking their physical and ergonomic differences - because size and handling can’t be underestimated in daily use.
Handling and Ergonomics: Small & Stylish vs Bold & Commanding
Between these two, the Olympus E-P5 is the quintessential compact rangefinder-style mirrorless. Its retro-inspired design and diminutive body measuring just 122x69x37mm and weighing 420g make it surprisingly pocketable. Meanwhile, the Sony A9 is rooted in traditional SLR styling - muscular with a substantial grip, its dimensions spike to 127x96x63mm and weight hits 673g. This heft, however, translates to a better balance with hefty telephotos and robust build.
The E-P5’s all-metal construction feels solid yet lightweight. The tilting 3” touchscreen, though smaller at 1037k dots, is responsive, making quick composition changes intuitive. But don’t expect it to compete with the A9’s 3” tilting LCD with 1440k dot resolution - sharper and more detailed, especially vital in bright outdoor environments.
Examining control layouts, the Sony A9 embraces a profusion of dedicated buttons and dials across its top plate streamlined for pro workflows, complete with dual card slots and a large electronic viewfinder that covers 100% frame at 0.78x magnification. The E-P5’s minimalism eschews a built-in viewfinder, relying instead on an optional accessory EVF - a design choice signaling its amateur-friendly positioning.
In my experience, the Olympus’ smaller form and simpler controls appeal to street and travel photographers valuing discretion and portability. Professionals, especially sports or wildlife shooters, will appreciate the extroverted command deck and solid grip of the A9, which makes long telephoto sessions far less strenuous.
Sensor and Image Quality: Micro Four Thirds vs Full-Frame Brilliance
At the heart of any camera lies its sensor - and this is where our contenders diverge radically. The Olympus E-P5 employs a Four Thirds-sized 17.3x13mm CMOS sensor with 16MP resolution and the traditional 4:3 aspect ratio. Its sensor area roughly stretches to 225mm², which is significantly smaller than the Sony A9’s full-frame 35.6x23.8mm BSI-CMOS sensor boasting 24MP and a whopping 847mm² sensor area. The footprint difference translates directly into image quality and low-light prowess.
From my lab testing and extensive field use, the A9’s larger sensor naturally delivers superior dynamic range (13.3 EV vs. 12.4 EV on the E-P5), greater color depth (24.9 bits vs. 22.8 bits), and dramatically improved high ISO noise performance (DxOMark low light ISO cliff at ISO 3517 against Olympus’ ISO 895).
What this means practically: landscapes rendered on the A9 reveal finer shadow detail and richer highlight retention, while portraits benefit from richer skin tone gradations and more nuanced colors. The Olympus, while capable, sometimes displays noise and slight color shifts in challenging lighting, especially beyond ISO 1600.
However, the Olympus compensates with the Micro Four Thirds system lens lineup, highly regarded for compact primes and excellent sharpness - perfect for photographers prioritizing portability over pixel-peeping. The E-P5’s 5-axis in-body stabilization is no slouch, enabling steadier handheld shooting even with slower lenses, giving it an edge for macro or low-light handheld work.
Autofocus: From Contrast Detect to Lightning Fast Real-Time
The autofocus systems highlight the motherboard divide between these cameras. Olympus relies exclusively on contrast-detection AF with 35 selectable points, including face detection but no native phase-detection. On the other hand, the Sony A9 is armed with 693 phase-detect AF points integrated across nearly the entire frame, paired with real-time tracking including eye and animal-eye autofocus.
This difference is stark in rapid shooting scenarios. The Olympus E-P5, although capable for static subjects and shoots at a respectable 9 frames per second, can struggle with fast-moving unpredictables - sports or wildlife under flight, for example - since contrast AF hunts more and reacts slower.
Conversely, the Sony A9 boasts a prodigious 20 fps burst with blackout-free viewing, underpinned by a hybrid AF system that feels like a sixth sense in tracking erratic subjects. Its ability to maintain crisp focus on moving eyes is transformative for sports and wildlife professionals.
These autofocus distinctions also affect video performance. The E-P5’s AF is steady for casual Full HD (1080p30) clips but lacks advanced subject tracking, while the A9’s autofocus excels in 4K video recording - thanks to phase detection and dedicated features like focus peaking and real-time eye AF. (Note the E-P5 maxes out at HD video without 4K.)
Build Quality and Weather Resistance: A Pro Toughness Check
While Olympus E-P5 offers a robust metal chassis, it lacks any formal environmental sealing - meaning dust, moisture, or rough conditions are best avoided. It’s a fine entry level or enthusiast rig for controlled settings or casual adventures.
The Sony A9, conversely, provides professional-grade dust and moisture resistance, constructed from magnesium alloy to withstand demanding environments. This is a key consideration if you shoot outdoors in unpredictable weather or gritty situations - wildlife, sports stadiums, or travel in inhospitable climates.
For photographers planning to push their gear on extended assignments, weather sealing and durability are non-negotiable factors that place the Sony A9 firmly ahead.
User Interface and Rear Screen: Navigating Controls and Preview Like a Pro
Taking a close look at the back displays, the Olympus E-P5 offers a 3” tilting capacitive touchscreen with 1.03 million dots arranged in a 3:2 aspect, balancing responsiveness and clarity. It’s great for live view framing and touchscreen AF, but the smaller size can feel cramped during complex menu navigation or playback zooming.
The Sony A9 ups the ante with a 3” tilting LCD sporting 1.44 million dots and a wider prevalence of physical controls that work harmoniously with the touch interface. Its large, bright electronic viewfinder with 3.68 million dots and 100% coverage provides an immersive view, crucial for critical focus and composition in bright light where LCDs fall short.
Our hands-on testing always highlights a high-quality EVF as a make-or-break feature for serious shooters - viewfinder lag or low resolution interferes with composition flow and tracking moving subjects - where the A9 truly excels.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: Micro Four Thirds Depth vs Sony E-Mount Breadth
Both cameras tap into robust yet differently scaled lens ecosystems. Olympus’s Micro Four Thirds mount enjoys arguably one of the most mature, affordable, and compact lens line-ups. With 107 lenses available ranging from tiny primes to specialized macros and ultra-wide zooms, the system’s 2.1x crop factor can be a boon or a bane, depending on your needs.
The Sony A9’s full-frame E-mount supports an expansive 121-lens ecosystem and backward-compatible APS-C glass. This includes renowned high-end G Master primes and zooms, providing unparalleled image quality and versatility - from ultra-wide landscapes to super telephoto wildlife glass.
Lens choice fundamentally shapes image character - MFT lenses often boast stellar sharpness with compact designs, great for travel and street. In contrast, Sony’s E-mount caters squarely to professionals demanding ultimate image quality, speed, and reach.
Performance Across Photography Genres: Which Shines Where?
To make this comparison immediately practical, let’s analyze performance through the lens of specific photographic genres and use cases. This approach aligns with how I test cameras: field shooting with genre-specific tasks, then evaluating resulting images and handling.
Photography Type | Olympus E-P5 | Sony A9 |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Smooth skin rendering; pleasing bokeh from bright primes; limited depth of field control due to smaller sensor. | Superior skin tone gradation; shallow depth of field for subject isolation; eye/animal AF boosts sharpness. |
Landscape | High resolution for MFT; solid dynamic range, but shadows noisier at high ISO; great portability. | Outstanding dynamic range and resolution; excels in retaining highlight/shadow nuance; weather sealing ideal. |
Wildlife | Useful stabilization; slower AF limits fast subject capture; effective telephoto reach from 2x crop. | World-class burst and tracking; rapid, silent shutter; ideal for birds and fast-moving wildlife. |
Sports | Up to 9 fps frame rate; contrast AF can lag on quick action; smaller buffer. | Blazing 20 fps blackout-free capture; hybrid AF tracks rapidly changing scenes; pro-grade buffering. |
Street | Small, discreet body; quick startup; easily carried all day; tilting screen helps low/hip shots. | Bulkier, less inconspicuous; excellent AF in low light; silent shutter option useful for stealth; larger presence. |
Macro | Stabilization aids handheld macro; compatible lens options; focus precision less consistent. | Supports native macro lenses; excellent live view focus aids; vibration reduction superb. |
Night/Astro | ISO range up to 25600 but noisy beyond 1600; stabilization helps in low light handheld. | High native ISO up to 51200; excellent noise control; manual controls and bulb mode enhance astro-photography. |
Video | Full HD 1080p at 30p; limited audio control; no 4K or headphone/mic ports. | 4K UHD video; advanced video codecs; microphone and headphone jacks for pro sound. |
Travel | Lightweight and pocketable; solid battery life; single card slot; ideal for casual travel. | Larger and heavier but better weather resistance; extended battery and dual card slots; versatile for varied travel needs. |
Professional Work | Good raw support; basic workflow integration; limited durability and connectivity. | Pro-level tethering; extensive workflow compatible; rugged build; comprehensive remote and wireless control. |
Battery Life and Storage: Staying Power on the Go
Battery endurance is another practical concern. The Olympus E-P5 offers around 330 shots per charge - respectable for enthusiast daily use but limiting for prolonged outings without spares. Coupled with a single SD card slot, this restricts backup options, which pros will find challenging.
The Sony A9 operates nearly twice as long per charge (650 shots), supported by its NP-FZ100 battery known for efficiency. Its dual SD card slots allow simultaneous recording or overflow, a boon for safeguarding files during critical shoots.
Connectivity and Workflow Integration: Modern Conveniences Matter
While both cameras feature built-in wireless connectivity for image transfer, the Olympus lacks Bluetooth and NFC, relying on Wi-Fi only. The A9 integrates Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and NFC, providing faster, reliable connections with smartphones and tablets - critical for rapid image delivery in professional environments.
Tethered shooting on the Sony supports advanced control via Imaging Edge software, seamless RAW workflow, and remote configuration - all absent for the Olympus.
Price and Value: Budget Realities and Investment Longevity
At the time of comparison, the Olympus E-P5 hovers around a highly attractive $389 price point (body only), positioning it as an accessible entry-level mirrorless camera with robust features for enthusiasts and casual users.
By contrast, the Sony A9 is in the $4498 territory - an investment appealing to professionals and serious hobbyists prioritizing speed, durability, and image quality in demanding contexts.
Despite the daunting price gap, it’s clear that the A9 best serves the user needing top-tier abilities and longer gear lifecycles. Meanwhile, the E-P5 offers excellent value for those less concerned with cutting-edge speed or full-frame benefits.
Final Thoughts: Who Should Choose What?
Both the Olympus E-P5 and Sony A9 reflect their eras and intended audiences spectacularly well. The Olympus E-P5 works wonderfully for photographers who:
- Demand a lightweight, stylish camera for travel, street, and everyday shooting
- Appreciate the extensive Micro Four Thirds lens system’s compactness and affordability
- Value in-body 5-axis stabilization for handheld low-light or macro work
- Operate mostly in controlled or daylight environments where extreme autofocus and weather sealing are less critical
- Want to spend smartly while getting solid image quality and manual controls
In contrast, the Sony A9 is the powerhouse for:
- Professional sports, wildlife, and event photographers who need ultimate autofocus tracking and frame rates
- Users requiring rugged construction and weather sealing for harsh environmental conditions
- Those invested in full-frame’s superior image quality, dynamic range, and ISO performance
- Shooters needing full 4K video capabilities with professional-grade sound controls
- Photographers who prioritize comprehensive connectivity, workflow integration, and dual memory card backup
In Summary
- Olympus E-P5: An elegant, compact enthusiast’s tool with notable stabilization and classic design. Best suited for slower-paced genres and photographers valuing portability and affordability.
- Sony A9: A technical marvel engineered for speed, precision, and durability. Tailored to professionals or serious enthusiasts in demanding shooting environments.
As a final note, when choosing between these two, weigh the balance of image quality, autofocus performance, handling, and your specific photographic passions. My hands-on testing consistently showed the Olympus charm persists but doesn’t match the Sony’s pro-level technical mastery. However, for many users, the E-P5’s cheaper price and smaller size might make it the smarter, more enjoyable tool.
Whichever side you lean on, I hope this comparison has shed light on the essential real-world differences to help you confidently press the shutter next time. Happy shooting!
Appendix: Key Specifications At-a-Glance
Feature | Olympus E-P5 | Sony A9 |
---|---|---|
Release Year | 2013 | 2017 |
Sensor Size & Type | Four Thirds CMOS (17.3x13mm), 16MP | Full Frame BSI-CMOS (35.6x23.8mm), 24MP |
Max ISO | 25600 | 51200 (expandable to 204800) |
AF System | Contrast detection, 35 points | Hybrid (Phase + Contrast), 693 points |
Continuous Shooting | 9 fps | 20 fps (blackout-free) |
Video Resolution | Full HD 1080p @ 30fps | UHD 4K @ 30fps |
In-body Stabilization | 5-axis sensor stabilization | 5-axis sensor stabilization |
Viewfinder | Optional external EVF | Built-in EVF 3.68M dots, 100% coverage |
Weather Sealing | No | Yes |
Screen Size & Resolution | 3" 1.03M-dot tilting touchscreen | 3" 1.44M-dot tilting touchscreen |
Battery Life (CIPA) | ~330 shots | ~650 shots |
Storage | Single SD slot | Dual SD slots (UHS-II compatible) |
Price (approximate) | $389 | $4498 |
For readers considering their next camera, I recommend hands-on trials where feasible, especially to assess grip comfort and UI preferences. Ultimately, there is no one-size-fits-all - only the right tool for your photographic journey.
Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A9 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P5 | Sony Alpha A9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P5 | Sony Alpha A9 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2013-10-03 | 2017-04-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 204800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 693 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 121 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,440 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 9.0fps | 20.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/320 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 420 gr (0.93 pounds) | 673 gr (1.48 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 127 x 96 x 63mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 72 | 92 |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | 24.9 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | 13.3 |
DXO Low light score | 895 | 3517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 650 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) |
Storage slots | One | 2 |
Retail price | $389 | $4,498 |