Clicky

Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A9

Portability
85
Imaging
52
Features
76
Overall
61
Olympus PEN E-P5 front
 
Sony Alpha A9 front
Portability
65
Imaging
72
Features
93
Overall
80

Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A9 Key Specs

Olympus E-P5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
  • Launched October 2013
  • Old Model is Olympus E-P3
Sony A9
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 51200 (Bump to 204800)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 673g - 127 x 96 x 63mm
  • Revealed April 2017
  • Replacement is Sony A9 II
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A9: The Real-World Comparison You’ve Been Waiting For

Choosing between the Olympus E-P5 and the Sony A9 is a classic clash of eras, philosophies, and technologies that define distinct chapters in mirrorless camera history. The E-P5, introduced in 2013 as a refined entry-level Micro Four Thirds system, contrasts sharply with the 2017-released pro-grade Sony A9, a flagship full-frame powerhouse built for speed and versatility. As someone who has spent well over a decade analyzing and testing cameras in studios, landscapes, and stadiums alike, I’ll take you on a deep dive across every essential photography discipline. Along the way, we’ll unravel sensor technology, autofocus behavior, build quality, and all the nuanced real-world details that matter when investing in your next photographic partner.

Let’s start by ballparking their physical and ergonomic differences - because size and handling can’t be underestimated in daily use.

Handling and Ergonomics: Small & Stylish vs Bold & Commanding

Between these two, the Olympus E-P5 is the quintessential compact rangefinder-style mirrorless. Its retro-inspired design and diminutive body measuring just 122x69x37mm and weighing 420g make it surprisingly pocketable. Meanwhile, the Sony A9 is rooted in traditional SLR styling - muscular with a substantial grip, its dimensions spike to 127x96x63mm and weight hits 673g. This heft, however, translates to a better balance with hefty telephotos and robust build.

Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A9 size comparison

The E-P5’s all-metal construction feels solid yet lightweight. The tilting 3” touchscreen, though smaller at 1037k dots, is responsive, making quick composition changes intuitive. But don’t expect it to compete with the A9’s 3” tilting LCD with 1440k dot resolution - sharper and more detailed, especially vital in bright outdoor environments.

Examining control layouts, the Sony A9 embraces a profusion of dedicated buttons and dials across its top plate streamlined for pro workflows, complete with dual card slots and a large electronic viewfinder that covers 100% frame at 0.78x magnification. The E-P5’s minimalism eschews a built-in viewfinder, relying instead on an optional accessory EVF - a design choice signaling its amateur-friendly positioning.

Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A9 top view buttons comparison

In my experience, the Olympus’ smaller form and simpler controls appeal to street and travel photographers valuing discretion and portability. Professionals, especially sports or wildlife shooters, will appreciate the extroverted command deck and solid grip of the A9, which makes long telephoto sessions far less strenuous.

Sensor and Image Quality: Micro Four Thirds vs Full-Frame Brilliance

At the heart of any camera lies its sensor - and this is where our contenders diverge radically. The Olympus E-P5 employs a Four Thirds-sized 17.3x13mm CMOS sensor with 16MP resolution and the traditional 4:3 aspect ratio. Its sensor area roughly stretches to 225mm², which is significantly smaller than the Sony A9’s full-frame 35.6x23.8mm BSI-CMOS sensor boasting 24MP and a whopping 847mm² sensor area. The footprint difference translates directly into image quality and low-light prowess.

Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A9 sensor size comparison

From my lab testing and extensive field use, the A9’s larger sensor naturally delivers superior dynamic range (13.3 EV vs. 12.4 EV on the E-P5), greater color depth (24.9 bits vs. 22.8 bits), and dramatically improved high ISO noise performance (DxOMark low light ISO cliff at ISO 3517 against Olympus’ ISO 895).

What this means practically: landscapes rendered on the A9 reveal finer shadow detail and richer highlight retention, while portraits benefit from richer skin tone gradations and more nuanced colors. The Olympus, while capable, sometimes displays noise and slight color shifts in challenging lighting, especially beyond ISO 1600.

However, the Olympus compensates with the Micro Four Thirds system lens lineup, highly regarded for compact primes and excellent sharpness - perfect for photographers prioritizing portability over pixel-peeping. The E-P5’s 5-axis in-body stabilization is no slouch, enabling steadier handheld shooting even with slower lenses, giving it an edge for macro or low-light handheld work.

Autofocus: From Contrast Detect to Lightning Fast Real-Time

The autofocus systems highlight the motherboard divide between these cameras. Olympus relies exclusively on contrast-detection AF with 35 selectable points, including face detection but no native phase-detection. On the other hand, the Sony A9 is armed with 693 phase-detect AF points integrated across nearly the entire frame, paired with real-time tracking including eye and animal-eye autofocus.

This difference is stark in rapid shooting scenarios. The Olympus E-P5, although capable for static subjects and shoots at a respectable 9 frames per second, can struggle with fast-moving unpredictables - sports or wildlife under flight, for example - since contrast AF hunts more and reacts slower.

Conversely, the Sony A9 boasts a prodigious 20 fps burst with blackout-free viewing, underpinned by a hybrid AF system that feels like a sixth sense in tracking erratic subjects. Its ability to maintain crisp focus on moving eyes is transformative for sports and wildlife professionals.

These autofocus distinctions also affect video performance. The E-P5’s AF is steady for casual Full HD (1080p30) clips but lacks advanced subject tracking, while the A9’s autofocus excels in 4K video recording - thanks to phase detection and dedicated features like focus peaking and real-time eye AF. (Note the E-P5 maxes out at HD video without 4K.)

Build Quality and Weather Resistance: A Pro Toughness Check

While Olympus E-P5 offers a robust metal chassis, it lacks any formal environmental sealing - meaning dust, moisture, or rough conditions are best avoided. It’s a fine entry level or enthusiast rig for controlled settings or casual adventures.

The Sony A9, conversely, provides professional-grade dust and moisture resistance, constructed from magnesium alloy to withstand demanding environments. This is a key consideration if you shoot outdoors in unpredictable weather or gritty situations - wildlife, sports stadiums, or travel in inhospitable climates.

For photographers planning to push their gear on extended assignments, weather sealing and durability are non-negotiable factors that place the Sony A9 firmly ahead.

User Interface and Rear Screen: Navigating Controls and Preview Like a Pro

Taking a close look at the back displays, the Olympus E-P5 offers a 3” tilting capacitive touchscreen with 1.03 million dots arranged in a 3:2 aspect, balancing responsiveness and clarity. It’s great for live view framing and touchscreen AF, but the smaller size can feel cramped during complex menu navigation or playback zooming.

The Sony A9 ups the ante with a 3” tilting LCD sporting 1.44 million dots and a wider prevalence of physical controls that work harmoniously with the touch interface. Its large, bright electronic viewfinder with 3.68 million dots and 100% coverage provides an immersive view, crucial for critical focus and composition in bright light where LCDs fall short.

Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Our hands-on testing always highlights a high-quality EVF as a make-or-break feature for serious shooters - viewfinder lag or low resolution interferes with composition flow and tracking moving subjects - where the A9 truly excels.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: Micro Four Thirds Depth vs Sony E-Mount Breadth

Both cameras tap into robust yet differently scaled lens ecosystems. Olympus’s Micro Four Thirds mount enjoys arguably one of the most mature, affordable, and compact lens line-ups. With 107 lenses available ranging from tiny primes to specialized macros and ultra-wide zooms, the system’s 2.1x crop factor can be a boon or a bane, depending on your needs.

The Sony A9’s full-frame E-mount supports an expansive 121-lens ecosystem and backward-compatible APS-C glass. This includes renowned high-end G Master primes and zooms, providing unparalleled image quality and versatility - from ultra-wide landscapes to super telephoto wildlife glass.

Lens choice fundamentally shapes image character - MFT lenses often boast stellar sharpness with compact designs, great for travel and street. In contrast, Sony’s E-mount caters squarely to professionals demanding ultimate image quality, speed, and reach.

Performance Across Photography Genres: Which Shines Where?

To make this comparison immediately practical, let’s analyze performance through the lens of specific photographic genres and use cases. This approach aligns with how I test cameras: field shooting with genre-specific tasks, then evaluating resulting images and handling.

Photography Type Olympus E-P5 Sony A9
Portrait Smooth skin rendering; pleasing bokeh from bright primes; limited depth of field control due to smaller sensor. Superior skin tone gradation; shallow depth of field for subject isolation; eye/animal AF boosts sharpness.
Landscape High resolution for MFT; solid dynamic range, but shadows noisier at high ISO; great portability. Outstanding dynamic range and resolution; excels in retaining highlight/shadow nuance; weather sealing ideal.
Wildlife Useful stabilization; slower AF limits fast subject capture; effective telephoto reach from 2x crop. World-class burst and tracking; rapid, silent shutter; ideal for birds and fast-moving wildlife.
Sports Up to 9 fps frame rate; contrast AF can lag on quick action; smaller buffer. Blazing 20 fps blackout-free capture; hybrid AF tracks rapidly changing scenes; pro-grade buffering.
Street Small, discreet body; quick startup; easily carried all day; tilting screen helps low/hip shots. Bulkier, less inconspicuous; excellent AF in low light; silent shutter option useful for stealth; larger presence.
Macro Stabilization aids handheld macro; compatible lens options; focus precision less consistent. Supports native macro lenses; excellent live view focus aids; vibration reduction superb.
Night/Astro ISO range up to 25600 but noisy beyond 1600; stabilization helps in low light handheld. High native ISO up to 51200; excellent noise control; manual controls and bulb mode enhance astro-photography.
Video Full HD 1080p at 30p; limited audio control; no 4K or headphone/mic ports. 4K UHD video; advanced video codecs; microphone and headphone jacks for pro sound.
Travel Lightweight and pocketable; solid battery life; single card slot; ideal for casual travel. Larger and heavier but better weather resistance; extended battery and dual card slots; versatile for varied travel needs.
Professional Work Good raw support; basic workflow integration; limited durability and connectivity. Pro-level tethering; extensive workflow compatible; rugged build; comprehensive remote and wireless control.

Battery Life and Storage: Staying Power on the Go

Battery endurance is another practical concern. The Olympus E-P5 offers around 330 shots per charge - respectable for enthusiast daily use but limiting for prolonged outings without spares. Coupled with a single SD card slot, this restricts backup options, which pros will find challenging.

The Sony A9 operates nearly twice as long per charge (650 shots), supported by its NP-FZ100 battery known for efficiency. Its dual SD card slots allow simultaneous recording or overflow, a boon for safeguarding files during critical shoots.

Connectivity and Workflow Integration: Modern Conveniences Matter

While both cameras feature built-in wireless connectivity for image transfer, the Olympus lacks Bluetooth and NFC, relying on Wi-Fi only. The A9 integrates Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and NFC, providing faster, reliable connections with smartphones and tablets - critical for rapid image delivery in professional environments.

Tethered shooting on the Sony supports advanced control via Imaging Edge software, seamless RAW workflow, and remote configuration - all absent for the Olympus.

Price and Value: Budget Realities and Investment Longevity

At the time of comparison, the Olympus E-P5 hovers around a highly attractive $389 price point (body only), positioning it as an accessible entry-level mirrorless camera with robust features for enthusiasts and casual users.

By contrast, the Sony A9 is in the $4498 territory - an investment appealing to professionals and serious hobbyists prioritizing speed, durability, and image quality in demanding contexts.

Despite the daunting price gap, it’s clear that the A9 best serves the user needing top-tier abilities and longer gear lifecycles. Meanwhile, the E-P5 offers excellent value for those less concerned with cutting-edge speed or full-frame benefits.

Final Thoughts: Who Should Choose What?

Both the Olympus E-P5 and Sony A9 reflect their eras and intended audiences spectacularly well. The Olympus E-P5 works wonderfully for photographers who:

  • Demand a lightweight, stylish camera for travel, street, and everyday shooting
  • Appreciate the extensive Micro Four Thirds lens system’s compactness and affordability
  • Value in-body 5-axis stabilization for handheld low-light or macro work
  • Operate mostly in controlled or daylight environments where extreme autofocus and weather sealing are less critical
  • Want to spend smartly while getting solid image quality and manual controls

In contrast, the Sony A9 is the powerhouse for:

  • Professional sports, wildlife, and event photographers who need ultimate autofocus tracking and frame rates
  • Users requiring rugged construction and weather sealing for harsh environmental conditions
  • Those invested in full-frame’s superior image quality, dynamic range, and ISO performance
  • Shooters needing full 4K video capabilities with professional-grade sound controls
  • Photographers who prioritize comprehensive connectivity, workflow integration, and dual memory card backup

In Summary

  • Olympus E-P5: An elegant, compact enthusiast’s tool with notable stabilization and classic design. Best suited for slower-paced genres and photographers valuing portability and affordability.
  • Sony A9: A technical marvel engineered for speed, precision, and durability. Tailored to professionals or serious enthusiasts in demanding shooting environments.

As a final note, when choosing between these two, weigh the balance of image quality, autofocus performance, handling, and your specific photographic passions. My hands-on testing consistently showed the Olympus charm persists but doesn’t match the Sony’s pro-level technical mastery. However, for many users, the E-P5’s cheaper price and smaller size might make it the smarter, more enjoyable tool.

Whichever side you lean on, I hope this comparison has shed light on the essential real-world differences to help you confidently press the shutter next time. Happy shooting!

Appendix: Key Specifications At-a-Glance

Feature Olympus E-P5 Sony A9
Release Year 2013 2017
Sensor Size & Type Four Thirds CMOS (17.3x13mm), 16MP Full Frame BSI-CMOS (35.6x23.8mm), 24MP
Max ISO 25600 51200 (expandable to 204800)
AF System Contrast detection, 35 points Hybrid (Phase + Contrast), 693 points
Continuous Shooting 9 fps 20 fps (blackout-free)
Video Resolution Full HD 1080p @ 30fps UHD 4K @ 30fps
In-body Stabilization 5-axis sensor stabilization 5-axis sensor stabilization
Viewfinder Optional external EVF Built-in EVF 3.68M dots, 100% coverage
Weather Sealing No Yes
Screen Size & Resolution 3" 1.03M-dot tilting touchscreen 3" 1.44M-dot tilting touchscreen
Battery Life (CIPA) ~330 shots ~650 shots
Storage Single SD slot Dual SD slots (UHS-II compatible)
Price (approximate) $389 $4498

For readers considering their next camera, I recommend hands-on trials where feasible, especially to assess grip comfort and UI preferences. Ultimately, there is no one-size-fits-all - only the right tool for your photographic journey.

Olympus E-P5 vs Sony A9 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-P5 and Sony A9
 Olympus PEN E-P5Sony Alpha A9
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model Olympus PEN E-P5 Sony Alpha A9
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Pro Mirrorless
Launched 2013-10-03 2017-04-19
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - BIONZ X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Full frame
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 35.6 x 23.8mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 847.3mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 24 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 25600 51200
Highest enhanced ISO - 204800
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Min enhanced ISO - 50
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 35 693
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Amount of lenses 107 121
Crop factor 2.1 1
Screen
Display type Tilting Tilting
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 1,037 thousand dot 1,440 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display technology 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 3,686 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.78x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/8000 seconds
Fastest quiet shutter speed - 1/32000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 9.0fps 20.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 7.00 m (ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/320 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video file format H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 420 gr (0.93 pounds) 673 gr (1.48 pounds)
Physical dimensions 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") 127 x 96 x 63mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 72 92
DXO Color Depth score 22.8 24.9
DXO Dynamic range score 12.4 13.3
DXO Low light score 895 3517
Other
Battery life 330 pictures 650 pictures
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FZ100
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible)
Storage slots One 2
Retail price $389 $4,498