Olympus E-P5 vs Sony ZV-1
85 Imaging
52 Features
76 Overall
61
88 Imaging
54 Features
86 Overall
66
Olympus E-P5 vs Sony ZV-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Launched October 2013
- Superseded the Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 294g - 105 x 60 x 44mm
- Released May 2020
- Newer Model is Sony ZV-1 II
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-P5 vs Sony ZV-1: A Hands-On Comparison for Enthusiasts and Pros
Choosing between cameras from Olympus and Sony can feel like a real conundrum, especially when these two models - the Olympus PEN E-P5 and the Sony ZV-1 - represent distinct approaches to photography. I’ve spent countless hours with both, and today I’m sharing a detailed, experience-rich comparison of these two cameras. Whether you lean toward still image perfection, video versatility, or need a compact travel-friendly tool, you’ll find insights to help decide which deserves a spot in your gear bag.
First Impressions: Size, Build, and Ergonomics
Right off the bat, the style and physical handling of these cameras tell different stories.
The Olympus E-P5 carries a classic rangefinder-style mirrorless design, with solid metal construction that feels reassuringly substantial but not bulky. Weighing in at 420 grams and measuring approximately 122 x 69 x 37 mm, it comfortably fits in the hand with intuitive dial placement and a responsive tilting touchscreen.
By contrast, the Sony ZV-1 is a large-sensor compact weighing just 294 grams at 105 x 60 x 44 mm - significantly smaller and more pocketable, although thicker due to its zoom lens mechanism. Its fully articulated flip-out screen makes it exceptionally selfie and vlog-friendly, with a grip designed primarily for one-handed operation.

The layout on the Olympus, with dedicated exposure and shutter settings knobs, will appeal to traditional photographers who love manual control. The Sony trades some of those dedicated knobs for a simplified design, leaning into touch interface and menu-driven options.
Ergonomic Takeaway: For controlled, prolonged shooting sessions and precision handling - especially with interchangeable lenses - the Olympus holds the edge. For grab-and-go, casual shooting, or vlogging, the compactness and selfie-friendly design of the ZV-1 make it better suited.
Design Details Up Close: Control Layout and Interface
Now, let’s lift the hood and examine the control schemes in more detail. Not all buttons are created equal, and interface design can truly make or break usability.

The E-P5’s top plate sports a traditional mode dial, shutter speed dial, and dedicated exposure compensation dial - ideal for photographers who relish manual exposure tuning without menu hopping. Meanwhile, the Sony ZV-1 features a mode dial but relies heavily on a multi-controller joystick and touchscreen menus for finer adjustments. Its microphone input jack is prominently placed, a nice touch for video creators.
Looking at the rear LCD:
- Olympus offers a 3-inch, 1.037-million-dot capacitive tilting touchscreen, responsive and adequate for framing at unusual angles.
- Sony’s 3-inch, 922k-dot screen is fully articulated, a big plus for vloggers and self-portraits.

Given the ZV-1’s target market, Sony optimized for video ease - quick access to background defocus toggle, product showcase settings, and audio controls right at the fingertips. Olympus sticks to expert-focused knobs and less digital menu clutter.
Sensor, Image Quality, and Autofocus: The Heart of the Matter
Technical nerd moment: the imaging sensor size and AF system often dictate overall photographic quality, right? Let's dig in.

Sensor Specs
- Olympus E-P5: Features a Four Thirds 16MP CMOS sensor (17.3 x 13 mm, sensor area 224.9 mm²) with a native ISO range of 100–25,600. Olympus pairs this with a 5-axis sensor-shift image stabilization system.
- Sony ZV-1: Packs a 1-inch BSI-CMOS sensor offering 20MP resolution (13.2 x 8.8 mm, sensor area 116.16 mm²) with ISO 125–12,800 (expandable to 80–25,600). It uses optical lens-based stabilization.
Why it matters: The Olympus’s Four Thirds sensor is significantly larger than the ZV-1’s 1-inch sensor, which generally translates to better overall image quality, particularly in dynamic range, color depth, and noise performance, especially in low light.
DXO Mark (albeit partial since Sony ZV-1 wasn’t tested on the site) scores Olympus’s sensor around 72 points overall, with an excellent 12.4 EV dynamic range, whereas the Sony’s sensor is known to be very good but tends to fall behind larger sensors in image quality metrics.
Autofocus Systems
- Olympus relies on contrast-detection autofocus with 35 focus points and supports face detection and touch AF. However, it lacks phase-detection AF and animal eye detection.
- Sony’s ZV-1 implements a hybrid system with 315 focal-plane phase-detection points combined with contrast detection, delivering lightning-fast and accurate autofocus tracking, eye detection, and continuous AF performance.
In my extensive shooting tests, the Sony ZV-1’s autofocus is noticeably quicker and more reliable for tracking moving subjects and video focus pulls. Olympus E-P5's AF, while precise in static scenarios, occasionally lags behind in fast-paced shooting or video focus transitions.
Let’s Talk Photography Genres: Which Camera Excels Where?
Now to the meat of the matter - how do these cameras perform across photography disciplines? I’ll break this down to give you actionable insights.
Portrait Photography
Portraits demand natural skin tones, sharp eye focus, and beautiful bokeh.
-
Olympus E-P5: Thanks to its larger Four Thirds sensor, portraits have a more natural subject-background separation and slightly better control over depth of field - critical for delivering that creamy bokeh. The sensor-based 5-axis stabilization helps when shooting handheld in low light, leading to sharper eye detail. Face detection autofocus works well, but it lacks eye autofocus, which means you’ve got to be steady with manual focusing or rely on single-point AF.
-
Sony ZV-1: The fast zoom lens (F1.8-2.8) produces pleasant background blur for a compact camera, and its eye autofocus is a game-changer for fast capturing in candid or spontaneous settings. The autofocus locking onto eyes - multiple faces included - is reliable and fast, making it very friendly for quick portrait sessions.
In practical terms, if you prioritize shallow depth of field and manual focusing feel, Olympus nudges ahead, but if you want autofocus reliability for portraits, Sony’s eye AF wins.
Landscape Photography
Landscape photography is all about resolution, dynamic range, and weather toughness.
The Olympus E-P5’s 16MP Four Thirds sensor offers excellent dynamic range (12.4 EV native), allowing you to recover shadows and highlights with minimal noise. Its sensor-stabilization means sharper shots in dim light with longer exposures (or handheld twilight shots). While the body itself isn’t weather-sealed, paired with Olympus’s rugged lenses, it can manage light outdoor conditions. The Fn1 function button and electronic shutter up to 1/8000 sec add flexibility in bright situations.
The Sony ZV-1’s 1-inch sensor, despite its smaller size, produced surprisingly detailed and contrast-rich landscape images thanks to high pixel count and BSI technology. However, its boosted ISO performance isn’t as clean as the E-P5’s, and image quality can degrade under challenging lighting. No weather sealing here either.
Verdict: For deeply detailed landscapes with richer dynamic range and better noise control, Olympus is the preferred tool.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
These genres demand rapid autofocus, high burst rates, and tele-lens support.
-
Olympus E-P5: Burst shooting is solid at 9 fps, combined with 35 focus points. But autofocus relies on contrast detection, leading to slower acquisition and less reliable tracking of fast or erratic subjects. Lens choices offer significant telephoto reach via Micro Four Thirds ecosystem, notably high-quality 300mm+ super-telephoto lenses.
-
Sony ZV-1: Offers an impressive 24 fps burst rate and superior hybrid autofocus system with broad phase detection coverage, making it highly adept at tracking swift subjects. However, its fixed 24-70 mm zoom limits telephoto reach, which is a considerable tradeoff for wildlife photographers.
If you need reach and interchangeable lenses, Olympus’s system is your friend despite a slightly slower AF. For high-speed sports where tracking fast human athletes at mid-range focal lengths is key, Sony’s autofocus speed wins, but limited zoom constrains framing flexibility.
Street Photography
Street shooters need discretion, quick responsiveness, and decent low light handling.
At 294g, the Sony ZV-1 is stealthy and inconspicuous, appealing when you want to blend into the background. Its fast autofocus system combined with the compact body means you’re less conspicuous snapping moments candidly.
The Olympus E-P5, while pocketable, screams “photographer” a bit more, and with loud shutter sounds and a bigger body, you might stand out more during sensitive street work. However, it offers quicker mechanical shutter speeds (up to 1/8000 sec), useful for freezing motion in bright daylight.
Low light performance is quite comparable - Olympus pulls ahead slightly in noise levels, but Sony’s faster AF and autofocus in dim environments are big pluses.
Macro Photography
Precision and focusing accuracy drive success here.
Olympus's 5-axis IS and ability to pair with dedicated high-magnification Micro Four Thirds macro lenses give it excellent macro capability. The stabilization helps get sharp close-ups handheld, and its larger sensor provides better detail retention.
Sony ZV-1’s close focusing distance of 5cm at 24mm equivalent is respectable, thanks to the fast lens and autofocus speed. However, fixed focal length range and smaller sensor result in less overall magnification and detail compared to Olympus with specialized lenses.
Night and Astro Photography
This is where sensor size, noise control, and exposure latitude matter most.
The Olympus E-P5 outshines with its larger sensor and lower noise at high ISOs (native up to 25,600), plus sensor-shift stabilization assisting in handheld exposures. Its 60-second long shutter opens more creative options.
The Sony ZV-1 caps at 30 seconds for shutter speed and struggles more with noise past ISO 3200, limiting use in true astro conditions. However, its max electronic shutter speed up to 1/32000s is handy for daytime long exposures and bright conditions.
Video Capabilities
Sony has been a video pace-setter, and the ZV-1 represents a compelling tool for creators.
- It records true 4K UHD up to 30p with two bitrate options (60 or 100 Mbps), offers advanced codecs (XAVC S), 120fps Full HD slow motion, external mic input, and a clean HDMI feed.
- The fully articulated screen and touch controls allow vloggers to operate smoothly.
- Optical image stabilization keeps footage steady during handheld runs.
Olympus E-P5 caps video at Full HD 1080p @ 30fps only, with H.264 compression, lacking 4K or higher frame rates. It has built-in stabilization but no mic or headphone inputs, limiting audio quality control.
Travel Photography
Lightweight, versatile gear that shoots a variety of scenes without fuss.
Both cameras shine here but appeal to different travelers. Olympus, with its interchangeable lenses and sensor advantages, suits photographers who prioritize image quality and are willing to carry extra lenses. Battery life of 330 shots is more generous.
Sony’s compact size, selfie-friendly screen, and high burst speed suit social media-focused travelers, vloggers, and those who travel light. Battery life is a bit shorter (260 shots) but acceptable.
Professional Workflows
- Olympus’s RAW file support is mature and integrates well with major editing software, and its in-camera sensor stabilization makes handheld shots consistent.
- Sony’s RAW files benefit from the versatile exposure latitude and greater lens correction profiles through software.
For shooters working in controlled environments or on client jobs: Olympus's manual controls and build quality feel more professional, but Sony’s autofocus and video capabilities offer modern workflow benefits.
Durability and Extras
Neither camera offers weather sealing or ruggedness for tough outdoor use. Both use one SD card slot, and USB 2.0 transfer speeds are expected for their eras.
Olympus has built-in WiFi for remote control and image transfer but lacks Bluetooth. Sony includes both WiFi and Bluetooth, enabling quick file transfer and smartphone connectivity.
Battery Life and Storage
- Olympus E-P5 offers about 330 shots per charge.
- Sony ZV-1 rates around 260 shots per charge.
Neither are marathon shooters by today’s standards, but Olympus’s slight edge is welcome for longer roam sessions.
Price and Value Assessment
At current pricing, the Olympus E-P5 retails around $389, making it an excellent value proposition for Four Thirds sensor quality and manual control enthusiasts.
The Sony ZV-1, at $749, commands a premium but justifies it with its cutting-edge autofocus, 4K video, and vlogging-friendly features.
Summary Scorecards: A Snapshot of Strengths
And here, tailored genre-appropriate grading highlights key advantages:
Sample Images from Both Cameras
For real-world evidence, here’s a selection of side-by-side gallery shots comparing detail, dynamic range, color rendering, and low light noise.
You’ll notice Olympus excels in dynamic range and detail under tough lighting, while Sony’s files pop with vivid contrast and superior autofocus accuracy evident in low noise action shots.
Final Thoughts: Who Should Buy Which and Why?
Choose Olympus E-P5 if:
- You want a classic mirrorless experience with interchangeable lenses.
- Image quality and dynamic range top your priority list.
- You’re a portrait or landscape photographer who values manual controls and sensor stabilization.
- You need a solid, affordable option with proven performance for stills.
Choose Sony ZV-1 if:
- You want a truly compact camera with superb autofocus and video features.
- Vlogging, social media content, and casual shooting dominate your workflow.
- Fast burst rates and rapid autofocus tracking for sports or street photography are important.
- You prefer ease of use with selfie-friendly articulated screen and mic input.
My Take
Having used both extensively - Olympus’s tactile, deliberate controls appeal to my inner photographer, while Sony’s ZV-1 thrills me with its autofocus speed and video chops. Both fill distinct niches brilliantly. The E-P5 is a superb tool for enthusiast stills shooters who crave image quality without breaking the bank; the ZV-1 is perfect for content creators prioritizing quick action and vlog-ready features.
Ultimately, your choice hinges on your shooting style and priorities. I hope this detailed breakdown gives you clarity to decide confidently. Now, go capture something amazing!
For deeper walkthroughs and test footage clips from both cameras, check out my video review linked above.
Olympus E-P5 vs Sony ZV-1 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-P5 | Sony ZV-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-P5 | Sony ZV-1 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-10-03 | 2020-05-27 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 315 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/1.8-2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 9.0fps | 24.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Rear Sync, Flash Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/320 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 100p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 100p / 60 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 60i / 24 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 60i / 17 Mbps, AVCHD, MTS, H.264, Dolby Digital1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 420 gr (0.93 lb) | 294 gr (0.65 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 105 x 60 x 44mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 72 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 895 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 images | 260 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $389 | $750 |