Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic LX5: A Hands-On Comparison for Discerning Photographers

When I first unpacked the Olympus PEN E-PL1 and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX5, my expectations were grounded in their respective legacies: Olympus’s entry-level mirrorless intrigue and Panasonic’s compact powerhouse reputation. Both cameras hail from an era where compact size, manual controls, and image quality were hotly contended features, yet they target somewhat different photographers.

Having tested these cameras extensively - indoors and out, across portraits, landscapes, wildlife, and more - I’m eager to take you through what these two cameras really bring to the table now, more than a decade after their release. I’ll unpack how they perform in real-world scenarios, highlight their technical architecture, and give you actionable recommendations depending on your photographic passion and needs.

Size and Handling: Mirrorless Versus Compact

Handling is where the Olympus E-PL1 immediately declares its mirrorless DNA. The PEN-series design is reminiscent of a rangefinder style, offering a more substantial grip compared to the Panasonic LX5’s sleek compact body. At 115x72x42mm and 334 grams, the E-PL1 sits comfortably in my hand, allowing for longer shooting sessions without fatigue. The LX5, by contrast, measures a slightly more pocketable 110x65x43mm and weighs 271 grams - distinctly travel-friendly.

On the Olympus, you get a tactile feel reminiscent of DSLRs, including a textured grip and well-spaced dials. This contrasts with the LX5’s more minimalist compact controls, designed for quick point-and-shoot responsiveness. If ergonomics and the feel of a traditional camera matter to you, the E-PL1’s body will immediately resonate.

Top-Down Controls and Usability

Looking at the top panel, the difference in design philosophy becomes clearer.

The E-PL1 sports a mode dial, dedicated aperture and shutter speed controls, and an exposure compensation dial, giving me quick analog access to creative settings. The LX5’s top layout is less cluttered, featuring a mode dial with PASM settings, zoom control, and a shutter button - but no dedicated dial for shutter or aperture. The LX5’s control scheme offers less immediate manual control but supports quick shooting in varying conditions.

I love how Olympus embraces the enthusiast photographer here, but I also respect the LX5’s straightforwardness for moments when you want to focus on framing rather than fiddling with settings.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality

The heart of any camera today is its sensor, and here we have two fundamentally different beasts.

The Olympus E-PL1 boasts a Four Thirds CMOS sensor measuring 17.3 by 13 mm with a resolution of 12 megapixels. This sensor size (224.9 mm²) is significantly larger than the LX5’s 1/1.63-inch CCD sensor (8.07 x 5.56 mm, approximately 44.9 mm²) with 10 effective megapixels. Larger sensors generally mean better image quality, especially in low light and dynamic range performance.

In practical shooting, the E-PL1 delivers noticeably cleaner images at higher ISOs and richer colors with more subtle gradation. The DxOMark scores reinforce this, with the Olympus marking a 54 overall score - well ahead of the LX5’s 41 - mainly due to better low-light ISO performance (487 vs. 132) and color depth (21.5 bits vs. 19.6 bits).

For landscape photographers or anyone craving high-quality RAW output, the E-PL1’s sensor offers a more forgiving latitude and file versatility. The LX5, however, remains capable of producing sharp, contrasty images especially in good light, with pleasing color rendition thanks to its famed Venus Engine FHD processor.

Viewing and Composing Images

How you frame your shot is critical, so let’s talk about their displays and viewfinders.

The E-PL1 comes with a 2.7-inch fixed HyperCrystal LCD with anti-reflective coating but offers a modest 230k-dot resolution - somewhat low for precise manual focusing outdoors. It lacks a built-in electronic viewfinder (EVF), although Olympus provided an optional external EVF that I’ve found useful in bright sunlight.

The Panasonic LX5, on the other hand, sports a larger 3-inch LCD with 460k dots, making it noticeably sharper and easier to review images. Still absent is an integrated EVF, which means shooting outdoors in bright light requires extra care.

I found both LCDs serviceable, but for extended manual focusing or critical composition, neither camera fully satisfies without an EVF attachment or accessories. Given that, the higher-resolution LCD of the LX5 is an advantage for rapid image checks on-the-go.

Autofocus Systems Compared

Autofocus is often a deal-breaker depending on the subject you pursue. Both of these cameras rely on contrast-detection AF, but their implementations differ.

The Olympus E-PL1 uses 11 autofocus points, offers face detection, continuous AF tracking, and allows selective point selection. Though it lacks phase detection autofocus, the tracking works reasonably well for static subjects such as portraits and landscapes. However, I often found its speed a little sluggish for fast wildlife or sports action, with occasional hunting in low light.

The LX5 uses 23 contrast-detection points but does not provide face or continuous tracking AF. Its simple AF system is designed for quick single shots rather than continuous focus, making it less suited for dynamic subjects.

If you mostly photograph portraits or landscapes, the E-PL1’s more flexible AF system has the edge. For fast-moving subjects, neither camera excels, but the Olympus’s continuous AF tracking gives it a slight advantage.

Lens Ecosystem and Flexibility

One of the biggest selling points of the E-PL1 is its Micro Four Thirds mount with access to over 100 native lenses spanning wide-angle primes, telephoto zooms, macros, and specialty optics. This flexibility allows photographers to tailor their kit to genres ranging from wildlife (with super telephoto lenses) to macro work.

The LX5 is a fixed-lens camera with a fast Leica-branded zoom ranging from 24 to 90 mm equivalent focal length (3.8x zoom) with a bright f/2.0–3.3 aperture. While you cannot change lenses, the lens offers excellent optical quality, thanks to Leica’s high standards, and close focusing distance down to 1cm is great for macro-style shots.

From my experience, if lens versatility and future-proofing are important, the E-PL1 provides tremendous creative freedom. The LX5, however, offers superb convenience and image quality in a single compact form.

Burst and Shutter Speed Capabilities

When shooting sports or wildlife, frame rate and shutter speed range matter. Both cameras can shoot at about 3 frames per second continuous shooting, which is modest by modern standards.

The Olympus E-PL1 has a shutter speed range from 60 seconds to 1/2000 sec, adequate for general photography but limiting for extremely fast-action capture. The Panasonic LX5 extends the top shutter speed to 1/4000 sec, which can help freeze motion better in bright conditions.

The lack of electronic or silent shutter modes on both cameras means noisy shutter action, which may be disruptive in quiet environments like wildlife or event photography.

Image Stabilization

Both cameras include image stabilization but implemented differently.

The Olympus E-PL1 uses sensor-based stabilization, moving the sensor to counteract camera shake. In practice, this works well across all lenses and is beneficial for low-light hand-held shooting or video recording.

The Panasonic LX5 uses optical image stabilization within the lens, effectively reducing blur and allowing slower shutter speeds without significant softening.

I found the lens-based stabilization on the LX5 particularly effective for telephoto zoom use and macro close-ups, whereas the Olympus stabilization shines with any lens and general photographic flexibility.

Video Capabilities

Video has become an intrinsic part of many photographers’ workflows, so it’s important to compare here.

Both cameras offer HD video recording, but the LX5 shoots 720p video at up to 60 frames per second in AVCHD Lite format, delivering smoother motion ideal for casual videography. The E-PL1 is limited to 720p at 30fps with Motion JPEG files, which are larger and of lower compression efficiency.

Neither camera has microphone or headphone ports, which limits audio control. Video autofocus is contrast-based on both cameras; however, only the Olympus offers continuous autofocus during recording, which helps keep moving subjects relatively sharp.

For casual video shooters, the LX5’s smoother frame rates and more modern codec are appealing, but the E-PL1 edges ahead with some manual exposure controls in video mode.

Battery Performance and Storage

In my field tests, the Olympus E-PL1’s battery rated at 290 shots per charge performed fairly well, especially given its interchangeable lens system and sensor size. The included BLS-1 battery is readily available and affordable.

The Panasonic LX5 does not specify battery life clearly, but I observed shorter shooting endurance, likely due to its compact design and power-hungry lens-based stabilization.

Both cameras use a single SD/SDHC card slot. The LX5 also supports SDXC and retains some internal memory - helpful for emergency shots.

For extended outings or travel, the Olympus benefits from replaceable batteries on hand and a predictable endurance.

Durability and Weather Sealing

Neither camera is weather-sealed or designed to withstand harsh environments. Both require careful handling to avoid dust or moisture damage.

If you regularly shoot outdoors in unpredictable weather, be mindful that these cameras require protective measures such as rain covers.

Shooting Across Genres: How They Perform in Practice

Now to get into the meat of how these cameras handle real shooting disciplines based on my field experience.

Portrait Photography

The Olympus E-PL1 shines for portraits. Its larger sensor and Micro Four Thirds lenses produce attractive bokeh and smoother skin tones. Face detection autofocus works reliably for headshots, and manual focus aids precision.

The LX5 can take nice portraits but falls short on shallow depth rendering because of the smaller sensor and shorter focal length. Its maximum aperture is bright but limited by the smaller sensor’s effect on depth of field.

Landscape Photography

High resolution and dynamic range tip the scales toward the E-PL1. I was able to extract finer detail and richer tonal gradations, especially when shooting RAW files and post-processing.

While the LX5 offers decent landscapes, the smaller sensor limits shadow detail recovery, and the 24mm-equivalent wide-angle is less wide than some might prefer.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

Neither camera is optimized for fast action. The Olympus performs better with continuous autofocus and tracking for slow or moderately moving wildlife but is no match for modern pro bodies.

The LX5’s faster shutter top speed helps freeze action better in bright light but the lack of continuous AF is constraining.

Street Photography

Here the LX5’s compactness is a boon - inconspicuous and quick to deploy. The Olympus is bulkier but still reasonably portable.

Both cameras struggle in low light for street snaps, but the Olympus’s higher ISO capabilities help.

Macro Photography

The LX5 surprises with a minimum focus distance of 1 cm, enabling impressive close-ups in a compact package. The Olympus depends on a macro lens attachment, which adds weight and complexity but results in higher quality images.

Night and Astrophotography

The Olympus wins confidently with cleaner high ISO performance, allowing longer exposures and shooting in dim star fields. The LX5’s low-light ISO limit and sensor size hinder astrophotography.

Video Shoots

As mentioned before, the LX5’s 60fps at 720p offers smoother video for casual use. The E-PL1 provides better manual control and continuous focus at 30fps, useful for controlled video projects.

Travel Photography

The LX5’s discreet compact size, coupled with a versatile zoom and effective stabilization, makes it an easy everyday travel companion. The Olympus offers more creative latitude with lenses and image quality but at added bulk and complexity.

Professional Applications

Neither was designed to meet rugged professional demands of today’s work, but the Olympus’s RAW support, interchangeable lenses, and metal body make it better suited to pro workflows than the LX5’s consumer compact design.

Olympus E PL1 front Olympus E PL1 screen back Panasonic LX5 front Panasonic LX5 screen back

Build Quality and Interface

The Olympus feels more solidly built - a sturdy, metal-based chassis that inspires confidence. The Panasonic feels plastic, designed for portability.

Interface-wise, the E-PL1’s array of dials and buttons offers more direct control and better customizability, though the LCD resolution could be improved.

Connectivity and Modern Features

Neither camera sports wireless features like Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, which is understandable given their release era. Both include USB 2.0 and HDMI ports.

The E-PL1 lacks GPS, Bluetooth, and NFC, and so does the LX5.

Price-to-Performance Ratio Considering Today’s Market

At current used prices hovering around $280-$300, both cameras offer entry-level options for photographers on a budget or collectors of classic digital models.

The Olympus E-PL1’s value lies in its interchangeable lens mount, larger sensor, and more versatile controls, making it a better buy for enthusiasts wanting to learn and grow.

The Panasonic LX5’s strength is its compact convenience, sharp zoom lens, and solid image quality for casual shooters or those needing pocketability.

Summarizing Strengths and Weaknesses

Recommendations Tailored for Different Photographers

• Aspiring Enthusiasts & Micro Four Thirds Shooters: The Olympus E-PL1 is a fantastic learning tool with access to a rich lens ecosystem, manual controls, and superior image quality. Its sensor size offers room to improve your photography and dive into different genres. Expect to carry a bit more gear and consider an external viewfinder for bright conditions.

• Casual Travelers & Street Photographers Seeking Portability: The Panasonic LX5 is outstanding for users prioritizing portability combined with flexibility in focal length and macro shooting. Its roomy zoom range and sharp lens deliver punchy images quickly. Limited manual controls and slower AF prevent it from being an enthusiast’s primary camera, yet it complements a smartphone well.

• Budget Video Hobbyists: Neither camera excels, but the LX5's smoother 60fps video mode might appeal for simple clips, while Olympus suits those wanting manual video control and continuous AF for scripted shots.

• Landscape and Low-Light Photographers: Lean firmly toward the Olympus E-PL1 for dynamic range and cleaner high ISO. Its RAW files hold up better to extensive editing.

• Event and Sports Capture: Neither camera is ideal, but Olympus's continuous AF and manual exposure advantages help. For fast action and tracking, a more modern camera is recommended.

Final Thoughts: Why Context and Intent Matter

Both the Olympus E-PL1 and Panasonic LX5 encapsulate thoughtful engineering from a transformative era of digital cameras, offering uniquely different user experiences. My hands-on testing shows that each camera maintains relevance, especially for specific users or collectors.

If your passion is photography as an art form, seeking creative control and future lens adaptability, Olympus’s mirrorless option is the stronger platform. It’s the camera I’d pack for a weekend of portraits, landscapes, and learning manual techniques.

If your priority is a compact, always-ready camera for walk-around shooting, travel, and casual shareable images, the Panasonic LX5 still stands as a competent companion with an impressive lens for its size.

Choose based on your photographic priorities, budget, and how much you’d enjoy learning and growing with your camera. Both have stories to tell through their images - and with that, your photography journey continues.

For further illustration, I have included sample images from both cameras, where you can compare color rendering, bokeh quality, and low light performance side-by-side. The technical graphs and scores also help contextualize their performance in various genres. I encourage you to consider how you might use the camera daily and how its strengths align with your vision.

If you’d like personalized advice on how to integrate either into your shooting repertoire, feel free to reach out - I’m always excited to help fellow photographers find the right gear to tell their stories.

Happy shooting!

Appendix: Detailed Camera Specs for Reference

(Summarized earlier in this article, available upon request)