Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus Tough-3000
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10c2f/10c2fc55195237e69fad4f95871fa6ff43ec81c2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1s front Olympus PEN E-PL1s front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Launched November 2010
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL1
- Successor is Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus Tough-3000, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both are created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-PL1s (12MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is pretty similar but the E-PL1s (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-PL1s was brought out 11 months later than the Tough-3000 and they are both of a similar age. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL1s being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-PL1s matches up versus the Tough-3000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL1s & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PL1s Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Olympus Tough-3000
E-PL1s | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2010 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 11 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-PL1s
Tough-3000 | E-PL1s |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1s and Olympus Tough-3000
E-PL1s | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL1s features physical dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus Tough-3000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-PL1s against the Tough-3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c308/5c308afa886f3a78fc9e3c149e0803713b909b5d" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL1s and Tough-3000 is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a21f/5a21f3bfdf6724ad9b85fb5ca9f348b1ca723d4e" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to see the difference between sensor sizing simply by going over a spec sheet. The photograph below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL1s and Tough-3000.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy the same exact resolution albeit not the same sensor sizing. The E-PL1s has got the bigger sensor which should make obtaining shallow depth of field less difficult. The fresher E-PL1s is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2ef3/a2ef325e30b70d2122e79ff43d54a5583a8c9a61" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8e8e/c8e8e61046610293de3baf3eaa397404b686a101" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Also Known as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2010-11-16 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Truepic V | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 334 gr (0.74 pounds) | 159 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $599 | $0 |