Olympus E-PL1s vs Sigma Quattro
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45


63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Olympus E-PL1s vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Released November 2010
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Launched February 2016

Olympus E-PL1s vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus E-PL1s versus Sigma Quattro, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sigma. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-PL1s (12MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the E-PL1s (Four Thirds) and Quattro (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizes.

The E-PL1s was revealed 6 years earlier than the Quattro and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-PL1s scores vs the Quattro for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus E-PL1s vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL1s & Sigma sd Quattro. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL1s Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Sigma Quattro
E-PL1s | Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Olympus E-PL1s
Quattro | E-PL1s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | ![]() | November 2010 | Fresher by 64 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1s and Sigma Quattro
E-PL1s | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus E-PL1s vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL1s comes with physical measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL1s versus Sigma Quattro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the E-PL1s and the Quattro.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL1s and Quattro is 86 and 63 respectively.

Olympus E-PL1s vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizing simply by checking technical specs. The graphic here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL1s and Quattro.
As you have seen, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-PL1s with its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sigma Quattro will give you greater detail because of its extra 17MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older E-PL1s is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-PL1s vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL1s vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Sigma sd Quattro |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2010-11-16 | 2016-02-23 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Truepic V | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 29 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5424 x 3616 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sigma SA |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 76 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,620 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 3.8fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 334g (0.74 pounds) | 625g (1.38 pounds) |
Dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $599 | $738 |