Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 9000
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0db25/0db25b50f5db0e38bf19b46696bb0e06a463d704" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL2 front Olympus PEN E-PL2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cd55/6cd55e755b246a73ebaa42d5216b8beb3a328143" alt="Olympus Stylus 9000 front Olympus Stylus 9000 front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL1s
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Additionally Known as mju 9000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 9000, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both designed by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PL2 (12MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and 9000 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-PL2 was released 22 months later than the 9000 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-PL2 grades vs the 9000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL2 and Olympus Stylus 9000. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus 9000
E-PL2 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2011 | ![]() | May 2009 | More recent by 22 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus E-PL2
9000 | E-PL2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus 9000
E-PL2 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL2 features external dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 9000 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the E-PL2 versus the 9000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd692/bd6926255dc3e7a776db8b30d9fd49a9edaca3c3" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL2 and 9000 is 85 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74f4b/74f4b09fac0d4e04058f7dbcefb00df73f9fd0ea" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to see the difference in sensor measurements merely by checking out specifications. The photograph here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL2 and 9000.
To sum up, both cameras have got the exact same resolution albeit not the same sensor measurements. The E-PL2 comes with the bigger sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field less difficult. The more recent E-PL2 will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab5ea/ab5ea6b251e3142f7fc8ec10d33603086a6634f8" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28604/28604067fb6b5ddc384bc2018182ae14d575d5b5" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
Also referred to as | - | mju 9000 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2011-02-11 | 2009-05-14 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Truepic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 362g (0.80 pounds) | 225g (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $0 | $300 |