Clicky

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-4

Portability
85
Imaging
48
Features
47
Overall
47
Olympus PEN E-PL2 front
 
Olympus Tough TG-4 front
Portability
90
Imaging
41
Features
51
Overall
45

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
  • Launched February 2011
  • Replaced the Olympus E-PL1s
  • Renewed by Olympus E-PL3
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Revealed April 2015
  • Old Model is Olympus TG-3
  • Later Model is Olympus TG-5
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview

On this page, we will be comparing the Olympus E-PL2 versus Olympus TG-4, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both built by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL2 (12MP) and TG-4 (16MP) and the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and TG-4 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-PL2 was introduced 5 years earlier than the TG-4 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera.

Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a short view of how the E-PL2 scores against the TG-4 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus TG-4

 E-PL2 TG-4 

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus E-PL2

 TG-4 E-PL2 
RevealedApril 2015February 2011More modern by 50 months

Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus TG-4

 E-PL2 TG-4 
Manual focus More precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Screen resolution460k460kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL2 comes with physical dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) and the Olympus TG-4 has measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).

See the Olympus E-PL2 versus Olympus TG-4 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the E-PL2 versus the TG-4.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-4 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL2 and TG-4 is 85 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-4 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes merely by looking through technical specs. The picture here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL2 and TG-4.

As you have seen, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-PL2 using its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus TG-4 will provide you with extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-PL2 will be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-4 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-PL2
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-4
60
manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focus
delivers RAW formats
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
47
you can focus manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
offers face detect focus
delivers RAW formats
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Street photography highlights
Olympus TG-4 Street photography highlights
73
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is fixed
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
weather proof
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
more heavy than others (247g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Sports photography advice
Olympus TG-4 Sports photography advice
45
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
resolution not great (12MP)
not so great battery life (280 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
48
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
weather proof
great battery life (380 CIPA)
max frames per second low (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Travel photography advice
Olympus TG-4 Travel photography advice
51
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse recording
not so great battery life (280 shots)
resolution not great (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
74
great battery life (380 CIPA)
weather proof
MP count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than others (247 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus TG-4 Landscape photography highlights
61
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
resolution not great (12MP)
not so great battery life (280 per charge)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
62
you can focus manually
quite wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
delivers RAW formats
weather proof
great battery life (380 CIPA)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
manual exposure not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-PL2
Vlogging with Olympus TG-4
29
image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detect focus
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone socket
34
quite wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have microphone port
more heavy than others (247 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus TG-4
 Olympus PEN E-PL2Olympus Tough TG-4
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus PEN E-PL2 Olympus Tough TG-4
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Launched 2011-02-11 2015-04-13
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Truepic V TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 6400 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 11 25
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 460k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 10.00 m 7.90 m (at ISO 1600)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/160s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 362 grams (0.80 lb) 247 grams (0.54 lb)
Physical dimensions 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.2 not tested
DXO Low light rating 573 not tested
Other
Battery life 280 photographs 380 photographs
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-5 LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $0 $379