Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VG-145
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0db25/0db25b50f5db0e38bf19b46696bb0e06a463d704" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL2 front Olympus PEN E-PL2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55ae3/55ae31f75e84dab7b0db2166a0240eba322fda00" alt="Olympus VG-145 front Olympus VG-145 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Released February 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL1s
- Successor is Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released July 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
Below is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VG-145, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PL2 (12MP) and the VG-145 (14MP) is fairly close but the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and VG-145 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-PL2 was unveiled 5 months prior to the VG-145 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-PL2 grades against the VG-145 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL2 & Olympus VG-145. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery & Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus VG-145
E-PL2 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Olympus E-PL2
VG-145 | E-PL2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus VG-145
E-PL2 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2011 | ![]() | July 2011 | Same age |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL2 enjoys physical dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) while the Olympus VG-145 has specifications of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VG-145 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the E-PL2 vs the VG-145.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c00f0/c00f0012e7b899b67b271dbeecfd8e362a11576d" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VG-145 size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VG-145 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL2 and VG-145 is 85 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01818/018182adce719bf16eca4f1d5912f0b13baff0cb" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VG-145 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VG-145 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing a spec sheet. The visual below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL2 and VG-145.
Clearly, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-PL2 using its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus VG-145 will result in more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a1b7/7a1b7c20eff1167867aff24d0320761fa95982fe" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VG-145 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VG-145 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b7c5/8b7c54587ca8183790310e806e43371acf1fc601" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus VG-145 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus VG-145 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2011-02-11 | 2011-07-27 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Truepic V | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | 4.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 362 grams (0.80 lbs) | 120 grams (0.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 photos | 160 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $0 |